Exar Kun vs. Palpatine

Started by MythLord44 pages

Given that Jedi Battles and Sith Wars both refer to Sheev and Yoda as the most powerful in history on an individual basis, I'd imagine it applies to the quote I posted as well.

Besides, most Jedi have died by the time of Yoda's and Sidious' duel, and what other Sith was there? A crippled Vader? It doesn't really make sense to just refer to that timeframe when there's so little candidates.

With regards to Force and Destiny, there's still better candidates to take Palpatine's throne than Exar, in any case, and the way FaD words it implies that it's a likelihood more than just a possibility.

Given that Jedi Battles and Sith Wars both refer to Sheev and Yoda as the most powerful in history on an individual basis, I'd imagine it applies to the quote I posted as well.

Maybe you should have just posted those, then. The quote in by itself is open to interpretation.

Besides, most Jedi have died by the time of Yoda's and Sidious' duel, and what other Sith was there? A crippled Vader? It doesn't really make sense to just refer to that timeframe when there's so little candidates.

I'm pretty sure Vader wasn't a cyborg by the time Yoda and Sidious duels, and Kenobi, a legendary Jedi Master, who has hype as one of the most skilled and powerful ever, wasn't just a pushover Jedi either.

Regardless of how you spin it, my point was, the quote can be interpreted in a different way, and still be 100% valid.

With regards to Force and Destiny, there's still better candidates to take Palpatine's throne than Exar, in any case, and the way FaD words it implies that it's a likelihood more than just a possibility.

I honestly can couldn't care less about where Kun ranks overall, my point was the quote isn't definitive. No matter how you slice it, "possibly" isn't a certainly, so the quote specifically, leaves room for debate - it's all I'm trying to say.

This isn't to say I don't believe Sidious is the most powerful, only that the quotes you used aren't the greatest ways to prove it.

1. 1.The N.E.C was made from an in-universe perspective of the character Voren Na'al, therefore it has no validation, given the fact that this character has lived only in Palpatine's times and New Jedi Order times
2. The key word "may be" is the important thing here. The writer sowed a seed of doubt in our minds. He isn't making an accurate statement. It can simply refer to his overall power. And in the same the writer is raising the question if Palpatine is really the only big bad? Which, again, can be debated.
3. Both of them are compared to the Banite Sith and Jedi(and existing Jedi and Sith generally during ROTS era)

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Maybe you should have just posted those, then. The quote in by itself is open to interpretation.

'Twas the only one I had on hand, atm. God knows where I put the Sith Wars/Jedi Battles sourcebooks.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
I'm pretty sure Vader wasn't a cyborg by the time Yoda and Sidious duels, and Kenobi, a legendary Jedi Master, who has hype as one of the most skilled and powerful ever, wasn't just a pushover Jedi either.

Regardless of how you spin it, my point was, the quote can be interpreted in a different way, and still be 100% valid.

When they dueled Vader was in a state of confliction, and while Obi certainly is formidable, it's hard to believe he'd be comparable to Yoda in any sense or category, so championing Yoda over fodder and Kenobi, and Sidious over just Vader doesn't seem like a likely scenario.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
I honestly can couldn't care less about where Kun ranks overall, my point was the quote isn't definitive. No matter how you slice it, "possibly" isn't a certainly, so the quote specifically, leaves room for debate - it's all I'm trying to say.

This isn't to say I don't believe Sidious is the most powerful, only that the quotes you used aren't the greatest ways to prove it.

Eh, it's not like there aren't at least a dozen quotes championing Sidious as the most powerful(TCSWE, BtS, TCVD, Legends: The Epic Collection, etc.), I just thought of posting some of the more recent ones.

Originally posted by MythLord
Eh, it's not like there aren't at least a dozen quotes championing Sidious as the most powerful(TCSWE, BtS, TCVD, Legends: The Epic Collection, etc.), I just thought of posting some of the more recent ones.

The problems are not only the accolades(which can be rendered obsolete due the passing of time. Reprinting doesn't make it clear either) but also with the people who blatantly misunderstand them.
I mean, I strongly presume that most of the STAR WARS FANDOM take those accolades as if they make reference to Sidious' DBZ power. Some don't even bother to analyze their context.
And only use the 'TEH LUCASBSOLUTES STATEMENTS and fail to realize that C-canon and G-canon conflict themselves(hence why Lucas stated that the EU has its own road to follow due to the vision of so many writers)

That changes so very little, lmao. Most of Sheev's accolades are legitimate, and there's no tip-toeing around it, despite how much you'd wanna reach.

Obviously, Sidious is the most powerful Sith, this would be easily acceptable if not for the Sheev wank which portrays him as untouchable amongst the rest of the Sith.

Sheev wank was the worst thing to ever happen to Lightsnake's legacy.

Palpatine being "untouchable" obviously isn't the case for every Sith, but Exar Kun certainly isn't giving him a lot of pause.

By what margin? Feats? Ignoring how incredibly unrealistic it is to base a Star Wars battle off of how shiny their magic was, I'd think the fact that Sheev is meant to be the big bad return of the original Sith order, which was the anxient Sith, speaks to the idea that whilst Sidious is top dog, he'snot meant to massively surpass the original big bads.

Him being the most powerful is unquestionably fact, but it's also very clear that he is the end product of the entire Sith order's return to prominence after it's massive decline. That's 90s EU in a nutshell.

I don't think he'd have an easy time of it against Kun at all, Kun's so far out of the league of guys like Ommin, who is pulling off feats like dominating millions of minds with the dark side, that he's obviously knocking on Palpatine's door.

Palpatine's supremacy is absolute, but the margin of that superiority isn't anywhere near as big as is claimed.

And most of that is irrelevant. The gap between Kun and Palpatine might've once been small, but with the introduction of other beings that fit into that gap(i.e. Vitiate, Krayt, Plagueis, etc.) the difference has become substantial.

Sidious' reign as the top dog Sith was absolute since RotS, perhaps even prior as of TPM when he kills Plagueis, and there's a rather massive power-growth he experiences from RotS to Dark Empire, and that just seals the deal for Palpatine even more.

@Mthylord: Again, I'm not arguing against Sidious being the most powerful, I'm more commenting on the two quotes you posted specifically, and it can factually be interpreted multiple ways and still be 100% valid.

I got the message.

Originally posted by AncientPower
Obviously, Sidious is the most powerful Sith, this would be easily acceptable if not for the Sheev wank which portrays him as untouchable amongst the rest of the Sith.

Sheev wank was the worst thing to ever happen to Lightsnake's legacy.

Before Lightsnake, Sidious was considered fodder for any character born before 1000BBY.

Now, he's generally considered supreme above all other contenders, even after SWTOR.

His Imperial Majesty's banner has been proudly erected across the interwebz. Lightsnake was the spark that lit the fuse. His legacy is beyond reproach.

Sidious oneshots

Kun got taken down by Odan Urr, Sidious can take down Vader telepathically, ragdoll Maul, and choke out Dooku across a galaxy. Kun can't even hurt force sensitives in the senate lmao

Originally posted by MythLord
"Yoda went after Palpatine in the empty Senate chamber, but could not defeat the most powerful Sith Lord in history."

-- The New Essential Chronology

Written by an in-universe historian, this isn't a definite statement. In fact: Coming from a historian (read: a scientist dealing with historical facts) the idea that this refers to Sidious force power in comparison to all previous Sith Lords is pretty unreasonable. Especially when there are fields in which Sidious is - without any doubt (and in a scientifcally measurable sense) - the most powerful Sith ever (e.g. military and political power).


"His[Palpatine's] power may be unparalleled in the history of the Sith."

-- Force & Destiny

Oh. It "may be"? Nice...


"When the most powerful Jedi battled against the most powerful Sith, the two sides of the Force clashed in spectacular style. Grand Master Yoda took on Darth Sidious in the Senate building on Coruscant and proved that strength and power have nothing to do with size."

-- Jedi Battles

Clear reference to the actual Jedi / Sith and not the entire history of both organizations. And isn't that one from the DK series books that seems to operate based on movies / TCW only? Just asking.


These are EU sources, published far after the invention of Exar Kun. In fact, the last two are after the invention of even Vitiate, who himself is more powerful than Exar, or Plagueis, who's also more powerful Vitiate.

Yeah. And none of those quotes is definite? So? .
And Plagueis is only more powerful than Vitiate according to Plagueis.


As to the question: by how much? Well, you can guess the gap is definitely considerable since Dark Empire Sidious is more powerful than RotJ Sidious, who's more powerful than ANH Sidious, who's more powerful than RotS Sidious, who's more powerful than TPM Sidious, who rivals Plagueis, who's at least on par with SWTOR Vitiate, who's above Exar Kun.

Your argument falls apart at the same spot than the line of thought before. The only source for Plagueis being superior to / on par with Vitiate, is the thoughts of Plagueis. A Plagueis, mind you, that considered some of Vitiate's feats so unbelieveable that he labeled them "exeggerations" and "legends". Which makes it kind of questionable wether or not he considered Vitiate's more extreme feats, when putting himself above him - which still is just not definite.

And as far as authorial intent goes - apparently - Kun is above Canon!Sidious (RotJ) and possibly on par with DE!Sidious. Both of whom, as you've mentioned, would be more powerful than RotS!Sidious, who would be Kun's opponent in this fight.


Most of the sources he's featured in.

Yeah. Right. 🙄 Either prove up or shut up.

Several characters substantially beneath Sidious in strength managed to drive their lightsabers through lightsaber resistant material via muscle, so I'd imagine Palpatine could as well.

Since lightsaber fencing has precisely nothing to do with strength, especially not in terms of "cutting power" of those blades, I can just marvel what you are even talking about. Which shouldn't be the case in a "debate", you know. Bring sources or quotes to the table instead of making vague allusions to some situations that might have happened somewhere in a SW source.

Originally posted by MythLord
That changes so very little, lmao. Most of Sheev's accolades are legitimate, and there's no tip-toeing around it, despite how much you'd wanna reach.

Urm. There is no doubt about the accolades being "legitimate", but more about what they say and how. For instance: I don't see any reason to put Sidious far above the likes of Kun, Vitiate / Valkorion and the like, where certain people perceive a significant power gap, that is not even implied anywhere. And, of course, there is the question to what extend they are useable in the context of versus fights.

I don't see much use in being "the most powerful Sith", when your opponent is possibly just slightly less powerful than yourself, yet comes waltzing in with abilities far more focused on / better suited for combat, is equipped with "gimmicks" that boost his power (i.e. Kun's amulet) and combat efficiency (i.e. lightsaber resistant armor, unique weapon, unique style). So maybe people want to move past their m.o. of attempting to decide versus fights with quotes. 😉

I don't know why we're trying to nitpick the fallibility of individual accolades. When you have that many accolades saying the same thing, it's pretty damn obvious what the holistic intent for that character is - to be the most powerful.

Especially when at most the quotes are questionable, as in not 100%, but they're hardly outright disproved either. I think there's no question anymore after you have more than a dozen of those quotes.

Nai, I've not responded mainly due to a lack of motivation, but since you seem to be going on about Kun's unique style and weapon, I'll post my response to the lightsaber section now:

The comment regarding Exar Kun’s lightsaber abilities was given aboutPadawan Kun. To spell that out for you😛adawan Kun is already better with a lightsaber than all other beings that Vodo has trained in six centuries. This is before he turns to the Dark Side (which does amplify people’s combat skills), before he designs his own weapon and comes up with a style to wield it, which would have made him an even more formidable swordsman.
And, because of the same reason, the last quote can’t be extended to Kun, because the Order didn’t “produce” him as a sword master.

I don’t see how the dark side increases one’s combat ability aside from the occasional rage boost, unless that’s specifically what you’re referring to. In that case, Kun has already experienced this dark rage as a Jedi, as is fairly evident from his facial expressions here:

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11111/111114474/4592342-vs+sylvar2.png

The panel even notes how Kun feels “a rage of his own”. So the quote does indeed extend to Sith Kun, when he’s wielding a single blade. But fair enough on it not applying to the double-bladed lightsaber. Mace still has a solid advantage in raw skill, though, as I’ll explain now:

Mace Windu is a superior duelist to Anoon Bondara, a Jedi Weapons Master, canonically one of the greatest lightsaber duelists in history. 600 years is a rather short amount of time compared to the entire history of the Jedi Order; Anoon is more skilled than Kun. And Mace’s superiority to him – and Qui-Gon, who, according to the below quote, is also more skilled than Bondara – widens the gap between Kun and Windu quite a bit. Not anything drastic, but still noticeable.

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11117/111178634/4847557-4336274664-48468.png

Only a handful were ever elevated to the rank of Jedi Weapons Master, and these were revered for their skills.

-The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia

During his tenure at the Jedi Temple on Coruscant, he spars with superior lightsaber duelists such as Qui-Gon Jinn and Mace Windu. Although he humbles himself when compared to their skill, Bondara's prowess is nonetheless considerable.

-Jedi Academy Training Manual

Mace is also noted to be canonically superior to Dooku, someone who is objectively ranked at the third spot in the Jedi Order’s history (quotes in my previous post). Again, this puts a quite a wide gap between Mace and Kun. There’s also this:

Master Windu himself remained perfectly balanced and centered. In the history of the Jedi Order, only two opponents ever overcame him in battle. One was Master Yoda, who some said was the Order's true master of lightsaber combat. The other was former Master Dooku, whose own fighting style was archaic, yet stunningly effective.

-Power of the Jedi Sourcebook

If we take the above statement at face value – and I see no reason not to – it would mean Windu has been besting experienced Jedi swordmasters in sparring matches ever since his Youngling and Padawan days (logically, Masters should spar with their Padawans, and lightsaber instructors most definitely do) and only ever lost to Dooku and Yoda. Exar Kun has nothing on this level. While it wouldn’t be a stomp, it would be a rather one-sided fight – if it came down solely to skill.

But this fight is not solely about skill; as you’ve brought up many times, Kun possesses a unique weapon and a unique style. This won’t be a problem for Mace, however, as he has experience fighting against double-bladed weapons in his fight against Asajj Ventress and a shoto in his fight with Sora Bulq. Kun will not catch Mace off-guard by wielding two blades, be they short or long.

As for styles, Mace has logically experience fighting against all seven forms of combat, as his reputation as the second greatest lightsaber wielder would require him to have fought basically everyone with something notable to their name – which could potentially include hundreds of Jedi – and beaten them. Even if you – for some reason – do not accept this without more concrete evidence, there are his spars with Anoon Bondara, a Jedi Weapons Master noted to be a master of multiple fighting disciplines, and Sora Bulq, a master of numerous styles, some classical, some of which he developed himself:

While all Jedi receive some training in combat, few make fighting the central focus of their union with the Force. These Jedi are weapon masters, adepts of various styles of melee combat.

-Power of the Jedi Sourcebook

Sora Bulq was one of the greatest lightsaber instructors the Jedi order had ever known, perfecting the various forms of combat techniques, both classical and experimental. He even helped Mace Windu perfect the art of vaapad, the seventh form of lightsaber combat so intense and dangerous, that to practice it was to tread perilously close to the dark side.

-Databank: Sora Bulq

The study seventh form in itself requires mastery of multiple forms, and Bulq, alongside Mace Windu, was noted to have “perfected” it. Yet despite this, Windu is pretty much capable of stomping Bulq. I’ll link this rather brilliant blog by fellow user EmperorDMB, explaining the circumstances behind the duel:

http://comicvine.gamespot.com/profile/emperordmb/blog/mace-windus-lightsaber-duels-analysis-thread/127977/

He has also faced Tràkata in the hands of Dooku. Although this is never outright confirmed, it is still logical given that Dooku is knowledgeable on the style and his very weapon boasts a feature which allows him to change the blade-length on the fly.

Dooku's expertise in one-to-one combat was aided by some intelligent design features that were built into his lightsaber. Among them was a thumb trigger that allowed Dooku to reduce the blade size instantly for short-range, surprise attacks.

-The Official Star Wars Fact File 68

Another thing to note about Windu is his ability to almost instantly adapt to utterly alien weapons. Before his fight with Asajj Ventress, he had never faced a saberstaff, yet was still capable of handing her ass to her in the same fight. Even if Exar has something up his sleeve that is completely alien to Windu, it will present no problem for him.

I will now summarize why Windu beats and is greater than Exar Kun. Mace Windu...

...has raw skill far surpassing that of Exar.

...has experience fighting against saberstaffs, single blades, dual blades, shotos, long and short blades used at once, tactics that change the blade-length on the fly, etc.

...is familiar with and has experience against all classical forms of lightsaber combat

...is able to adapt instantly to alien weapons and styles if he is confronted with them.

...dueled evenly with someone who has “mastered” numerous unique and personal fighting styles that were known only to him while using two lightsabers of different sizes providing him with access to many unorthodox methods and angles of attack.

...has never been defeated in combat except by Masters Dooku and Yoda, both more skilled than Exar.

And this is why I see Exar Kun having little to no chance against Mace Windu in a contest of technical ability. We don’t need to factor in physicals since Sidious is Kun’s opponent here, not Windu. We merely needed to establish Windu’s technical ability, since it correlates directly with Sidious’.

Gosh.
First: This is all based on a wrong (at least unproven) premise (Mace > Kun), meaning it doesn’t make sense to start with. But you’re making even more mistakes here. Mace’s Shatterpoint ability, which leads to Sidious losing his blade, is not an external factor, but a natural gift. And Sidious wasn’t holding back, which has been demonstrated countless times. The RotS commentary makes that rather clear. And even the picture you posted is utter tosh. While Sidious hold his blade out in Windu’s direction, he can’t deliver a killing blow, because Windu is moving backwards and Sidious is already extending his reach. Mace > Sidious as a swordsman. It’s that easy.

If you’ve read the RotS novel, it should be quite clear the “external factor” I was referrin to was Sidious' fear, which Mace uses to amplify his fighting capabilities even more than they already were, but as is revealed shortly after, the fear wasn’t Sidious’ but Anakin’s. So unless Mace Windu has the emotions of passers-by fueling his Vaapad even further, he cannot best Sidious in a duel.

Second, mind posting the quotes that have “demonstrated countless times” Sidious giving it his all in this fight?

Third, so Sidious can't take the kill because Windu was stepping backwards and Sidious had already extended his arm? Lol. Are you saying he can't swiftly lunge forward, or arch his back? Lol.

One must love your attempt to simplify my entire reasoning to a very small part of the argument. Kun doesn’t beat Sidious because he is a greater swordsman. He beats him, because he is an unpredictable swordsman (weapon and style), wearing lightsaber resistant armor and being much more focused on lightsaber combat and combat related applications of the Force than Sidious is.

Quote for Kun having lightsaber-resistant armor?

Anyway, I’ve already posted quotes about Sidious being a master of every weapon and every style, and proven his technical superiority to Windu – someone ahead of Kun in this aspect – so your point is moot.

And I’m pretty sure Windu was more focused on personal combat than Sidious was, too, yet he was still his inferior, despite Sidious not having used a lightsaber in years. Once you train yourself to a certain level, if your Force connection is strong enough, that level of skill never leaves you.

Originally posted by MythLord
And most of that is irrelevant. The gap between Kun and Palpatine might've once been small, but with the introduction of other beings that fit into that gap(i.e. Vitiate, Krayt, Plagueis, etc.) the difference has become substantial.

Sidious' reign as the top dog Sith was absolute since RotS, perhaps even prior as of TPM when he kills Plagueis, and there's a rather massive power-growth he experiences from RotS to Dark Empire, and that just seals the deal for Palpatine even more.

How exactly is Krayt Kun's superior when he's barely above Muur? Plagues' blurb is never going to be acceptable canon. Not when Publishers have made ridiculous claims before. DBT being a criminal case. In a comparison of feats, Plagueis really isn't anywhere near as cut and dry superior as you believe. Vitiate isn't even confirmed to be Kun's superior until Revan, which is almost sixty years after Kun's proclamation of supremacy.

Keeping in mind that Vitiate is already >> Muur, Ragnos and Hord directly after Nathema, and he gets far more powerful than that over the proceeding thousand years until the Revan novel, not even factoring how he got even more powerful in the three centuries until the game. So for me, Vitiate = ROTS Sidious isn't nearly as unbelievable as it would otherwise be made out to be, thus Vitiate's superiority over Kun doesn't change much at all.

ROTS is believable because he's arguably > Yoda as of that point, the jump from ROTS to ROTJ isn't nearly as big as many believe, when we take into account the fact that Vader's stunted growth still kept him within genuine threat range of Sidious. It isn't until DE when his powers have grown greatly since ROTS.

But that's irrelevant, because this is ROTS Sidious. Whom still wins, but in a hard fight. He really doesn't have any feats to suggest he's easily taking a Sith of this caliber.

LMFAO @ Bondara > Kun, sheer cancer.

Yeah, Az's ridiculousness has struck again.