Iranian Agreement goes through

Originally posted by Omega Vision
To be fair that would help his argument if anything, since he's arguing that the USA has been responsible for more violent deaths than every iteration of Iran/Persia going back 3000 years.

But mostly it points out that he has no idea what he's taking about.

And yet. . I'm still right. Even though I skewed the US numbers down and the Iran numbers up.

Originally posted by jaden101
And yet. . I'm still right. Even though I skewed the US numbers down and the Iran numbers up.

Simply stating you're right when others tell you you're wrong just makes it look like you're in denial.

To be fair, the others weren't telling him that he's wrong, just that his methodology was lacking.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Simply stating you're right when others tell you you're wrong just makes it look like you're in denial.

They've not told me I'm wrong though, have they? Some have nitpicked minor errors and others have cried like little bitches hoping I'm wrong. None of them have put up any opposing numbers to refute the general position.

Originally posted by jaden101
They've not told me I'm wrong though, have they? Some have nitpicked minor errors and others have cried like little bitches hoping I'm wrong. None of them have put up any opposing numbers to refute the general position.

Nobody needs to put up opposing numbers when a lot of your numbers are wrong and your only source is wikipedia. Furthermore, "crying like bitches" further proves my point that you're in denial. Good show though 👆

I'll just leave this here shall I?
http://www.sott.net/article/273517-Study-US-regime-has-killed-20-30-million-people-since-World-War-Two

Originally posted by psmith81992
Nobody needs to put up opposing numbers when a lot of your numbers are wrong and your only source is wikipedia. Furthermore, "crying like bitches" further proves my point that you're in denial. Good show though 👆

Yeah you fall into the latter category. I'm happy you realise this.

Originally posted by jaden101
Yeah you fall into the latter category. I'm happy you realise this.

Looks like the one getting defensive is the one crying 😂

Btw, sign of the times? Independent and unbiased? I know you were just looking for ANY source to confirm your baseless theory, and you picked a sick that makes alex jones look rational? LOL

This website was created by Laura Knight Jadczyk who is also a 911 truther

Put up some numbers and prove me wrong. If it's simply a matter of using wikipedia as you claim it shouldn't take you long.

Originally posted by jaden101
Put up some numbers and prove me wrong. If it's simply a matter of using wikipedia as you claim it shouldn't take you long.

I don't have to prove you wrong. You've yet to construct a reasonable argument, using wikipedia, messing up numbers, then posting a site created by a 911 truther. You're desperately reaching and it's entertaining.

http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/unworthy-victims-western-wars-have-killed-four-million-muslims-1990-39149394

Originally posted by psmith81992
I don't have to prove you wrong. You've yet to construct a reasonable argument, using wikipedia, messing up numbers, then posting a site created by a 911 truther. You're desperately reaching and it's entertaining.

So you can't formulate a counter argument then? Thought not.

Originally posted by psmith81992
I don't have to prove you wrong. You've yet to construct a reasonable argument, using wikipedia, messing up numbers, then posting a site created by a 911 truther. You're desperately reaching and it's entertaining.

Originally posted by jaden101
So you can't formulate a counter argument then? Thought not.

Sorry bra, you don't get to post something and then scream "prove me wrong". That's now how it works. I admire your weak attempts though. But entertain me some more.

Also, I'm unable to find their methodology. All this article says is "this is the number and any other number is fraudulent". NICE jaden, lol

you are such an obvious troll.

prove they aren't

Sorry I couldn't hear you over your incompetence. I wonder how many people you've amused on these forums.

https://carboncounter.wordpress.com/2014/03/22/i-do-not-understand-what-i-am-talking-about/

Nafeez Ahmed appears to have jumped the shark, if such a thing is possible in his case. On Friday Keith Kloor provided a thorough critique of both Mr. Ahmed’s journalistic methods

A man who spends half of his time concocting conspiracy theories

Originally posted by psmith81992
Sorry bra, you don't get to post something and then scream "prove me wrong". That's now how it works. I admire your weak attempts though. But entertain me some more.

Also, I'm unable to find their methodology. All this article says is "this is the number and any other number is fraudulent". NICE jaden, lol

And you're incompetent.

What you're unable to find is any counter argument.

Did you click the link to the pdf report? Doubt it. Did you click any of the numerous links to studies in the article? Doubt that as well. 1.7 to 2.0 million from 3 relatively minor wars from the US pov. Deary me.

What you're unable to find is any counter argument.

Did you click the link to the pdf report? Doubt it. Did you click any of the numerous links to studies in the article? Doubt that as well. 1.7 to 2.0 million from 3 relatively minor wars from the US pov. Deary me.

Originally posted by psmith81992
https://carboncounter.wordpress.com/2014/03/22/i-do-not-understand-what-i-am-talking-about/

That was easy

😂 you post a blog refuting an entirely different article. I post an article with a link to this
http://www.psr.org/assets/pdfs/body-count.pdf

Originally posted by psmith81992
Did you provide an argument? Didn't think so

What's that? You posted 2 articles with zero methodology and written by authors who are considered "conspiracy theorists" by the general populace? Thought so. Good show 👆

So a single blogger is 'general populace' now yeah? You post a link to someone having a moan about an entirely unrelated article. Comical effort. 😂 😂 😂