Originally posted by MF DELPH
F
What I took away from your first paragraph is that, essentially, anyone can have 'privilege' via class and wealth, but at some point that privilege can be revoked, and when it occurs to a black person it's because of their lack of white privilege and racism, but when it happens to a white person it's apparently some form of outlier and doesn't change the point that they have white privilege, which is always on, it just didn't kick in in those instances when a white middle class person or person of wealth ends up on the wrong side of the law or is a victim of some other form of circumstance, like not getting a job with thousands of dollars of student loan debt, falling victim to predatory lending practices by a bank or hedge fund manager and losing their home, and then winding up sitting in a drum circle in Central Park for Occupy.
Partially true, yes some privilege can be 'revoked,' but someone having privilege in an instance is not the same thing as immunity, and someone can have different privileges.
Another example would be marijuana usage- White people make up the majority of marijuana users, proportionally use marijuana more, but black people get arrested far more.
Article
You brought up an incident where a black law professor was detained as a possible home burglary suspect trying to enter his own home (the infamous "Beer Summit" incident). Just 3 weeks ago Sean Combs, aka Puff Daddy, aka P. Diddy (take that, take that, take that), a black rap producer, beat a white man with a f*ckin' kettlebell on the UCLA campus and wasn't shot on sight.
Yeeees, but nothing about privilege says 'this will ALWAYS' happen, and P. Diddy is a famous celebrity.
Coming up with specific instances demonstrates things do happen, but in order to tell what's common and what one is *likely* to encounter, one needs wider data.
That's why I find the concept of White Privilege bullshit. I'm black and have it better than a lot of white people, and I also have peaceful interactions with law enforcement because I:
Here's a thing, though: Statistically, the problems I'm talking about exist.
I mean, remember my post about the people-killed-by-police-in-NYC. 2/3rds of the black people in that group were killed were following the number one rule of not getting shot, 'don't be armed,' and were shot anyway. No white people who followed that rule got shot.
You may avoid problems, but white people can avoid many of those problems without having to act as nicely. What social class they're perceived in also affects how likely they are to be arrested, given the same attitude.
A white kid can go around smoking marijuana and be perceived as 'a good kid, just messing around.'
A black kid doing the same is much more likely to be, 'he's trouble, better take him to the station and get him off the streets.'
And, it varies by location:
Yes, in some communities, you're literally 10 or more times as likely to be arrested for the same crime if you're black than if you're white.
A level of behavior which may be brushed off in one area, may not in another.
Yes, your behavior definitely can protect you. That still is not the same as the races, on the whole, being treated at all equally by police.
Heck, investigation of Ferguson revealed that local laws were set up to extract money from the local black poor, and they came up with BS citations that they could apply to anyone for almost any reason- the number of 'outstanding tickets' outnumbered the actual populace by 50%, and included things like 'failure to comply' (which can and does include failure to comply with being frisked for no reason), 'manner of walking,' and 90% of them were to black residents.
Second article
You may act well enough that in less racist communities you can get by just fine, but can you avoid manner of walking? I would like to see you try to avoid manner of walking.
Another article
“Certain things make you a target,” a resident said. “If you walk with a book bag you’re suspicious, if you’re walking slow — it’s stupid stuff.”“These are the type of decisions you have to make when you want a fountain soda or a bag of Doritos,” he said: “You have to decide if you want to spend the night in jail — or your girl.”
After Brown’s death, he said things got worse.
“There were guys who were afraid to walk down the street because they didn’t have an ID. The police, that’s just an excuse for them to take you in and fingerprint you,” he said.
“It was like a buddy system,” Seltzer said, “not because of criminals, because of the police harassment.”
Also, when things were brought to course, white residents were 68% more likely to have their cases dismissed.
The white people and black people in Ferguson were treated very differently, and it's not the only town like that, and as the article notes, it's quite unlikely to even be the worst. Other towns have a more mild slant, where it's just white people getting off for stuff black people wouldn't, but there is zero question that skin color, statistically, has a very large effect on your treatment by the law, and it can be 'not too noticeable but statistically present,' to 'massive.'
Ultimately, the difference in treatment is not really a matter of opinion. It's there and it's significant.