Captain America vs Superman

Started by Adam Grimes21 pages

Originally posted by Deadline
I didn't respond because it looked like a bait thread. It doesn't matter what they think nobody backed up their opinion with fact and reasoning.

You do realise that cap could actually one-shot Superman? Nobodies seems to get this.

facepalm

Originally posted by Deadline
I didn't respond because it looked like a bait thread. It doesn't matter what they think nobody backed up their opinion with fact and reasoning.

You do realise that cap could actually one-shot Superman? Nobodies seems to get this.

Back your opinion up with facts of Cap as a GL.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
facepalm

You do understand that Cap has been able to Stun people who are more powerful and have comparable power to Superman just at his normal strength level. What do you think he's going to do when he can have potentially class 100 strength? One shot.

Originally posted by Deadline
You do understand that Cap has been able to Stun people who are more powerful and have comparable power to Superman just at his normal strength level. What do you think he's going to do when he can have potentially class 100 strength? One shot.
Show me some GL punching feats, I double dare you.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Show me some GL punching feats, I double dare you.

Are u serious like the loads of examples of Gls using boxing gloves etc? Or examples of GLs creating body armour etc. Huh?

So obvoulsly Cap can create enhanced body armour and use it to punch.

Originally posted by Deadline
Are u serious like the loads of examples of Gls using boxing gloves etc? Or examples of GLs creating body armour etc. Huh?

So obvoulsly Cap can create enhanced body armour and use it to punch.

No punching feats then?

Superman consistenly breaks through those constructs as if they were glass, it's embarassing.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
No punching feats then?

I don't need. As I already explained GLs can create enhanced power armour and it's not the Gls that are doing the punching Cap will, so you should be asking me about about Cap punching feats.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes

Superman consistenly breaks through those constructs as if they were glass, it's embarassing.

Yea I guess he's gonna break it with his face ie he's not going break it if Cap is engaging him in h2h. Cap will stomp him.

😂

Prove it.

I dunno look at MA ranking thread or Cap respect thread and compare that with Supermans h2h skills.

No, I want you to post feats of Cap hurting people in Superman's level. And if you can't do that, then show me a GL beating Superman.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
No, I want you to post feats of Cap hurting people in Superman's level. And if you can't do that, then show me a GL beating Superman.

There are lots of examples of Cap hurting people, not neccesarily on Supermans level but comparable ie class 100. Also they don't neccesarily need to be comparable because Cap doesn't have class 100 strength, some characters don't have class 100 durability but are still very durable its impressive what Cap can do, so we give Cap class 100 strength and we estimate how hard he could hit.

I don't need to show you a GL beating Superman we already know high end GLs could at least hold their own against Superman. Pretty sure Alan Scott can or even beat Superman.

I'm taking a break for now but you can take a look at the Cap respect thread in the mean time.

Ok.

Superman wins.

Sups is invureable so sups wins here even u put cap is like Green Lanterns

Originally posted by Deadline
You do realise that cap could actually one-shot Superman?

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 🤣 🤣 🤣

Seriously, how do you expect people to take you seriously when you make a retarded statement like the one above? I'm not sure if you're crazy enough to actually believe what you say or if you're just trolling. If anyone is getting one-shotted here it's Cap.

Originally posted by Deadline
I didn't respond because it looked like a bait thread. It doesn't matter what they think nobody backed up their opinion with fact and reasoning.

You do realise that cap could actually one-shot Superman? Nobodies seems to get this.


Hahaha. This is just golden.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Show me some GL punching feats, I double dare you.

😆 Are you at all familiar with Green Lanterns?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Back your opinion up with facts of Cap as a GL.

Nice pie in the sky argument. Cap hasn't been GL and you know this, so why would you ask someone to produce evidence of feats that don't actually exist?

Funny how you guys who otherwise would be wanking GL feats all of a sudden have group amnesia. What happened to the Krona killer attack? What happened to time travel? What happened to shielding against an antimatter storm?

Also, stop asking for examples of Cap as a GL when Cap has never been a GL. You are wasting board space and making yourself look desperate at the same time. Batman is not Cap, neither is Hal. Cap is so much more and it shouldn't be hard to project his capabilities as a GL based on his own attributes. You all simple don't want to do it and most of that comes down to D.C. brand and Superman loyalty.

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
Nice pie in the sky argument. Cap hasn't been GL and you know this, so why would you ask someone to produce evidence of feats that don't actually exist?

Lol and WHY would you back up an argument that has no feats and only WISHFUL THINKING?

Lol at this guy

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Lol and WHY would you back up an argument that has no feats and only WISHFUL THINKING?

Lol at this guy

Wishful thinking? 😄

Dude, no offense, but are you stupid? How the hell could there be feats? I didn't make the OP, take out your fanboy frustrations out on him. If you can't understand that the very premise of the proposed battle involving an amalgam character that has never existed in comics requires informed speculation, then you shouldn't be anywhere near this post. And there is no "wishful thinking" on my part. My analysis is that Captain American would win and I don't need your approval to hold that opinion.