Two Clintons
41 years
3 billion dollars of donations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/clinton-money/
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Two Clintons41 years
3 billion dollars of donations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/clinton-money/
Thats only because she is honest and worth every penny.......
Broke when they left the whitehouse and now the wealthiest ex-president of our time......
One of her bigger problems also is that she is supported by big money, which means she owes big money first before everyone else.
Look out Lena Dunham to the rescue of Hillary!
http://thehill.com/video/in-the-news/266885-lena-dunham-clinton-coverage-rabidly-sexist
#failfeminism
Originally posted by Adam_PoENo... Unless you think all Mgtow are feminists... Also using Tumblr is horrible, and should never be brought up to prove a point.
A feminist is anyone who advocates for gender equality. Feminists are not necessarily women. So yes, I can make determinations about what is a feminist issue, despite your condescension.Are you new to the internet? Have been to Tumblr? Have you been to Twitter? Examples abound of people who identify as feminists but are unconcerned with gender equality.
The world is unsafe. Life is not manageable. Actual safety is important. Your feelings are not. No one should be assaulted, but no one has a right to feel safe.
Value absolutely translates to power. People who have something of value to society, are arguably more powerful or have more access to power than those that do not.
People who are attractive are unconsciously given preferential treatment in society. That is true regardless of gender.
The difference is that society places more emphasis on the attractiveness of women while simultaneously considering it as diminishing more quickly than that of men.
It has nothing to do with "men wanting to **** women," because frankly, there are just as many men who do not want to have sex with women as there are women how do not want to have sex with men. But thank you for trying to label something as sexist while demonstrating your own heterosexism.
Who is speaking on behalf of young women? Ms. Steinem had a hypothesis about why younger women do not support Clinton in numbers as great as older women based on her observations and life experience. I think there is some merit to her argument. You do not. So what?
It's so great to watch 50% of the democratic voter base wake up to the lies of the left and the lies of Hilary.
The blow hands here won't accept it and now dancing Sanders to champion Holary because what this really shows is that the people waking up off the long snooze they have been in.
Now that this awakened group actually wants to hold Hilary accountable. The Holary group is now trying to suppress them, call them sexsist and racist.
Now the awakened group is asking the same questions the right has been asking this whole time.
So if we break is down if we take 90% of America and break it down.
30% Republicans against Hilary
30% of Democrats now against her.
30% still support her.
10% don't vote or undecided
That represent 60/30 majority.
This country will rise up against the lies of the left.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
And Adam loves her and hates Sanders😂
I actually like Sanders. He and Clinton voted the same 93% of the time. They are not that ideologically different. I would be happy with either of them as a candidate. I am just tired of seeing liberals repeating conservative talking points.
Originally posted by Henry_Pym
No... Unless you think all Mgtow are feminists... Also using Tumblr is horrible, and should never be brought up to prove a point.
That there are groups who are ideologically extreme on both sides of the issue does not negate the point. Feminists are not a monolith and there is no single feminist perspective on any issue. That two people both identify as feminists tells you very little about what they actually believe and why. That is actually the entire point of my original post; that two women can identify as feminists and hold divergent ideas about what feminism means to them.
Originally posted by BackFire
Lol at the idea of female Bernie supporters only being there for all the cute boyz.Maybe they researched him and thought he actually had good ideas?
Nah, just want the d.
It is no different than the idea that female Clinton supporters are only voting with their vaginas. Total lulz, amirite?
It could not be that they researched her and thought she actually had good ideas.
Nah, it must be their V getting in the way of their critical thinking.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I actually like Sanders. He and Clinton voted the same 93% of the time. They are not that ideologically different. I would be happy with either of them as a candidate. I am just tired of seeing liberals repeating conservative talking points.That there are groups who are ideologically extreme on both sides of the issue does not negate the point. Feminists are not a monolith and there is no single feminist perspective on any issue. That two people both identify as feminists tells you very little about what they actually believe and why. That is actually the entire point of my original post; that two women can identify as feminists and hold divergent ideas about what feminism means to them.
They are diametrically opposite on morals.
Are you really going to defend a woman who takes $500k jewelry from the Saudi's?
I have serious doubts your actually for women's rights.
Bernie has moral high ground on all issues.
Sure he voted for guns.
Guns are a god damn American right, just like being gay is your right.
Guns are my right.
Got it?
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is no different than the idea that female Clinton supporters are only voting with their vaginas. Total lulz, amirite?It could not be that they researched her and thought she actually had good ideas.
Nah, it must be their V getting in the way of their critical thinking.
Has any liberal Sanders supporter here said this though? You seem to be fighting this ignorance with more ignorance but from the Clinton campaign's spin.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is no different than the idea that female Clinton supporters are only voting with their vaginas. Total lulz, amirite?It could not be that they researched her and thought she actually had good ideas.
Nah, it must be their V getting in the way of their critical thinking.
Proof your a disgusting sexist pig and a only a feminist when the opportunity presents itself.
You have shown your true colors.
[QUOTE=15595503]Originally posted by Adam_PoE
[B]I actually like Sanders. He and Clinton voted the same 93% of the time. They are not that ideologically different. I would be happy with either of them as a candidate. I am just tired of seeing liberals repeating conservative talking points.[b][\quote]
Oh wait, so because the American people ask the same question because it's relevant, they are stealing lines from conservatives?😂
I forgot, only Hilary supporters have all the facts in truth and honesty department.
The number is 3 billion dollars.
That's the number the Clintons have stolen.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
They are diametrically opposite on morals.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Bernie has moral high ground on all issues.
Qualify your statements and substantiate your claims.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Are you really going to defend a woman who takes $500k jewelry from the Saudi's?
There is nothing to defend. Her gifts, just like those he made to Obama, went to the National Archives and the General Services Administration in accordance with the law.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I have serious doubts your actually for women's rights.
You must have missed the part where I do not give a **** what you think.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Sure he voted for guns.Guns are a god damn American right, just like being gay is your right.
Guns are my right.
Got it?
So you are telling me you have a small penis?
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is no different than the idea that female Clinton supporters are only voting with their vaginas. Total lulz, amirite?It could not be that they researched her and thought she actually had good ideas.
Nah, it must be their V getting in the way of their critical thinking.
Yes, it is no different. Both are equally idiotic.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Qualify your statements and substantiate your claims.There is nothing to defend. Her gifts, just like those he made to Obama, went to the National Archives and the General Services Administration in accordance with the law.
You must have missed the part where I do not give a **** what you think.
So you are telling me you have a small penis?
Must be you who has the small one since you were rejected by the other species and resorted to worshiping a sexually confused goat👆
Bernie has moral high ground on all issues.
Eh.
Here's a few-
The Federal Reserve. Right now, it's a non-partisan organization lead by a board of experts that played a major role in the recovery following the crash.
Bernie wants to replace the board, allowing no-one in the industry in, and every appointment confirmed by the senate, meaning it'd go from a non-partisan organization to a highly partisan politicized organization.
He also wants to ban raising interest rates until unemployment is below 4%... but unemployment almost never gets below 4% even when things are healthy and sub-4% unemployment causes problems, and this'd pretty much remove the interest rate as a tool for helping the economy.
Sometimes Bernie's ideas run off the rails and get into areas that'd be a serious problem for the country. Ultimately, being President is a job, and even if someone has some good ideas, having some very bad ideas can still cause lots of havoc.
I also like Hillary on immigration more, and she's pretty popular with other countries.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Proof your a disgusting sexist pig and a only a feminist when the opportunity presents itself.You have shown your true colors.
Yea, it's this kind of stuff that distracts from useful discussion. Adam didn't say anything that'd lead to that conclusion, you were just wanting to jump on him.