Nihilus and Vitiate vs. Sidious and Yoda

Started by S_W_LeGenD10 pages

Originally posted by SunRazer
And Yoda isn't?

Of-course he is.

But Darth Nihilus is an instrument of hunger and one of the greatest masters of Force Drain and Force Sever applications. This is why he is extremely dangerous in a versus scenario.

While the two chug boulders, cars and trees at each other, expect Darth Nihilus to siphon life-force of Yoda all along until the latter is compromised.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Didn't see one thing that related to my point. That you managed to type up all of this with no relevance to the post that you quoted might be a world record.

And Yoda isn't?

1. That Yoda's triumph was not such a BIG VICTORY! And that Sidious is highly elevated to a god-like status because of these statements.
2. No, he isn't. An aberration that easily holds a 1,3 km ship and even weakened he did it. You don't understand the magnitude of his power. We didn't even get to see Darth Nihilus' limits in terms of Force strength. And keep in mind he TK'ed with relative ease the Ravager before he started to eat planets.
Clearly, I don't see how Yoda even has the slightest chance to compete with Nihilus' stupid Force strength.
Sw Legends stop. Yoda doesn't have the power to compete with Nihilus in terms of Force strength.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Sidious is canonically more powerful than Nihilus, and he failed to dominate Yoda. Case closed.

Does that count as "logical argument" somewhere in a galaxy far, far away? Because it certainly doesn't here.

a)
That Sidious is more powerful than Nihilus (which can easily be argued - but let us not get down that path) doesn't mean that he is superior in every imagineable way. So Nihilus' "force drain" might pose a greater threat than Sidious force lightning. Which is entirely irrelevant. Because:

b)
Why would two individuals who made a point of utilizing area affect attacks against opposing groups (especially Vitiate - against his own Dark Council, against the Jedi Strike team) attempt to take down opponents in some duellist fashion? And:

c)
I wonder why people always fall back to hasty generalizations and A>B>C-arguments. The only Dark Sider on the level of Nihilus or Vitiate (possible) that Yoda confronted, was Sidious. While Sidious has never faced another powerful Dark Sider in combat. So one really has to wonder, how Yoda and Sidious suddenly become "immune" to rather elaborated and large scale dark side powers, utilzed by two individuals who "ate planets", based on the notion of them being "more powerful" than their opponents.

I think Nai's argument is pretty rock solid. Even assuming Team 2 can defend themselves from Nihilus' drain, which is a flat out baseless assumption, there's no way they can do that and survive against what Vitiate can throw at them at the same time.

That said, you're a bit out of date Nai, Sidious fought Mother Talzin in Son of Dathomir. He didn't perform that spectacularly though so take it how you want.

Originally posted by Nephthys
That said, you're a bit out of date Nai, Sidious fought Mother Talzin in Son of Dathomir. He didn't perform that spectacularly though so take it how you want.

I was thinking about "Sith" when I wrote "Dark Siders". I'm very well aware of that incident and, yes, he didn't perform that spectacularly, which could be seen as evidence for the idea, that he doesn't do as good against other Dark Side user, than he does against Jedi (with Mace Windu, utilizing the dark side as a weapon for the light with Vaapad, being a prime example).

K.

For once it would be nice imo, for there to be a Force duel where the characters actually use the supposed crazy levels of force knowledge and techniques they have. Instead of the few basic attacks over and over.

Originally posted by Nephthys
For once it would be nice imo, for there to be a Force duel where the characters actually use the supposed crazy levels of force knowledge and techniques they have. Instead of the few basic attacks over and over.

I agree. But then, the special effects department probably doesn't.

Originally posted by Nai
Does that count as "logical argument" somewhere in a galaxy far, far away? Because it certainly doesn't here.

a)
That Sidious is more powerful than Nihilus (which can easily be argued - but let us not get down that path) doesn't mean that he is superior in every imagineable way. So Nihilus' "force drain" might pose a greater threat than Sidious force lightning. Which is entirely irrelevant. Because: b)
Why would two individuals who made a point of utilizing area affect attacks against opposing groups (especially Vitiate - against his own Dark Council, against the Jedi Strike team) attempt to take down opponents in some duellist fashion? And: c)
I wonder why people always fall back to hasty generalizations and A>B>C-arguments. The only Dark Sider on the level of Nihilus or Vitiate (possible) that Yoda confronted, was Sidious. While Sidious has never faced another powerful Dark Sider in combat. So one really has to wonder, how Yoda and Sidious suddenly become "immune" to rather elaborated and large scale dark side powers, utilzed by two individuals who "ate planets", based on the notion of them being "more powerful" than their opponents.


Nai have you read my posts?
Sidious is nowhere a top-tier. At best he's around the level of a Dark Councilor, or less. Sidious' greatest power and statements come from his military power and galactic dominance

lmfao

Nihilus is nowhere near top-tier, either. I mean, he's below even MW Revan and all the Ancient Sith, and his greatest power and statements come from hyperbole and the fact that the galaxy was in ruins during his prime, hurr durr

Is this a joke? Are people really arguing Nihilus > Sidious?? I'm ****ing hanging myself

Well, there's still people who believe that the Sun revolves around the Earth and that the Earth is flat, so...

And that I think, is the inherent problem with your line of thought Sunrazer. Those who believe Sheev isn't 'zeh most powerful' are not synonymous with the Flat earth Society, rather that they're heretics of an ancient religion. It is pretty much your own opinion that Sidious is the most powerful based of dubious claims that are failable, and mostly out of date.

Not at all. I've accepted the idea that Vitiate might just be excluded from the quotes (though I presented my reason for otherwise in that thread where I still haven't had a reponse), but Nihilus? No. Some of the quotes are published after his existence, and the fact that numerous authors in numerous sources across decades have supported the notion means that it's one of the most ingrained facts of all SW lore.

As for flat earth society - that's synonymous to the "political power" arguments, when there's some quotes that blatantly refer to mastery of the dark side, lol.

That is wrong. The idea that sheev is the most powerful, is pretty much down to the personal opinion if a historian who was :

1) Alive during the rise of the Empire
2) Would likely be taking things other than dark-side power into consideration

1. It's down to numerous sources, over enough of a period and written by enough out-of-universe authors that I can take it at face value.

2. Right.

Well, in that case, I supose I'll ask you to provide evidence of which statements and quotes you think make Palpatine the most powerful sith lord in history, and we can go about ticking off the assumptions and contradictions from there.

Tomorrow. It's getting close to midnight here and I have to be up early.

Originally posted by SunRazer
lmfao

Nihilus is nowhere near top-tier, either. I mean, he's below even MW Revan and all the Ancient Sith, and his greatest power and statements come from hyperbole and the fact that the galaxy was in ruins during his prime, hurr durr


Did you read what I said to you?
Nihilus killed worlds with his Hunger to grow stronger and sustain his essence.
And it was him mostly who brought the Jedi Order almost to four Jedi.
Not to mention his monstrous TK.
All Sidious' statements relate to his knowledge and political power.
Do you even Star Wars with comprehension?
Do you understand that it required a plot to weaken him indirectly and a Wound in the Force and a dead world and a Miraluka to sunder their Force bond!?
Not to mention that Traya had no knowledge of him TKing the Ravager nor how many worlds he devoured of their Force energies.
Her statement of him being below the ancient Sith is because he became a slave-to his Hunger and it mastered him instead of mastering it.
Not to mention that we have straight statements that reveal us he got that Hunger from the Mass Shadow Generator. Kreia saying he was using some ancient Sith draining technique it was her pure opinion because we know that there's Vitiate's ritual which essentially did the same thing or when the Sith on Dxun prepared to devour Freedon Nadd's tomb dark side nexus. So there are certain ways to achieve Nihilus' Hunger; but it requires a lot of Force strength and long day rituals. Not to mention that Vitiate's ritual on Ziost had not the same impact it had on Nathema. So even Valkorion's Nathema is a singular event. Though, Vitiate managing to pull off a ritual by himself after Nathema in a disembodied form in a few moments speak volume to his power.
Letting aside the "lulz statements", Valkorion is approaching Darth Nihilus' heights of power.
Note: YEAH VITIATE WANKERS!!! Nihilus>Vitiate. But Vitiate is quickly coming to Nihilus in terms of Force strength.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Tomorrow. It's getting close to midnight here and I have to be up early.

I challenge you to do that. I could debunk these Darth Sidious' statements with the simple press of a keyboard button.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Is this a joke? Are people really arguing Nihilus > Sidious?? I'm ****ing hanging myself

if you could provide evidence to be otherwise; it'd be just fine.
But I doubt that there's any...