Black Lives Matter vs All Lives Matter

Started by Star42822 pages

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2015/black-lives-matter-f-yo-flag-activist-arrested-for-video-threats-to-kill-white-people-police

Yeah, BLM is bullshit just as I thought. It just leads to more division in the country and people with the attitude like the black woman who made that video. All lives matter is definitely a better slogan. 👆

Yes, let's judge an entire movement by the crazy words of one member.

For anyone who still doesn't get it, there was a good explanation of the operative difference between BLM and ALM on the Daily Kos after the O'Malley incident:

Of course "All lives matter". And all lives matter equally, but by uttering this banal statement in response to a rallying cry for a very specific problem, O'Malley is avoiding the very root of the problem that black people face. How can the systematic oppression faced by black people at the hands of police be addressed if the issue of color is taken off the table? They are disproportionately abused and killed precisely because of the color of their skin.

To better understand this situation, from my perspective, let's tell a story.

Imagine a house that was on fire. Now imagine the homeowner, Janet, running to her neighbors, crying out for help, but instead of her neighbors helping, they take offense. "Why should her house get more attention than mine? I need a new roof!" thinks one. "Look at that rude Janet, yelling and screaming, I'm entertaining guests!" says another to her husband. Janet knocks on another neighbor's door, only to be greeted with a surly "I'm sorry, but all our houses are important".

In the story, Janet represents the BLM protesters and her burning house is the oppression black people face at the hands of police. Now, if you can understand why the neighbors' reactions were wrong then you can see why saying "All lives matter" (ALM) in response to BLM is wrong. It uses a very banal slogan (ALM) to draw attention away from the real and pressing issue that black people face, that other races do not feel to the same extent. If you feel offended when someone says BLM, then I say you're like those neighbors in my story. And I invite you to step outside your self-absorbed bubble and to try to imagine what it's like to wonder if your next encounter with a police officer will be your last.

They are disproportionately abused and killed precisely because of the color of their skin.

I think this is a stretch. I wonder what the statistics of this claim show in comparison to other minorities.

Even your skeptical response though seems to recognize that minorities are disproportionately harassed and harmed by police.

An interesting question would be if "Minority Lives Matter" would be a better alternative to "Black Lives Matter" and "All Lives Matter"

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Even your skeptical response though seems to recognize that minorities are disproportionately harassed and harmed by police.

An interesting question would be if "Minority Lives Matter" would be a better alternative to "Black Lives Matter" and "All Lives Matter"

I've made this point on a number of occasions.

Okay so Black Lives Matter. Minority Lives Matter. These are all good things. I just wish these lives would matter all the time, instead of just when a cop is involved.

Minorities disproportionately harass and harm police.

Originally posted by long pig
Minorities disproportionately harass and harm police.

Lol. Not in my hometown; 9/10 when a cop has an altercation it's with a redneck.

I just saw a video on FOX in which a large group of Black Lives Matter activists were shouting "Dead Cops!" evertytime when the speaker asked them "What do you want?!" repeatedly. Then, "When do you want it?!" to which they replied "Now!"

Of course you saw it on FOX.

Originally posted by Sacred Fire
Of course you saw it on FOX.

CNN deletes facebook comments that don't support their narrative, so who is credible now?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
CNN deletes facebook comments that don't support their narrative, so who is credible now?

Yeah. LOL. Tell me about it. CNN also tried their best to make the public think the shooter in Oregon was white when he clearly wasn't. When it comes to choosing between CNN and FOX I"ll take my chances with FOX. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. 👆

Originally posted by Star428
Yeah. LOL. Tell me about it. CNN also tried their best to make the public think the shooter in Oregon was white when he clearly wasn't. When it comes to choosing between CNN and FOX I"ll take my chances with FOX. 👆

People forgive quickly among themselves, CNN will still be credible to most, even though they suppress free speech.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
CNN deletes facebook comments that don't support their narrative, so who is credible now?
None of them.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
CNN deletes facebook comments that don't support their narrative, so who is credible now?

Between Fox and CNN? CNN obviously....

Originally posted by Sacred Fire
Of course you saw it on FOX.

Distraction.

Blm is a hate group. No better than the current kkk.

Originally posted by long pig
Distraction.

Blm is a hate group. No better than the current kkk.

They are a racist hate group. But since they are black that makes them not racist in the eyes of liberals.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
They are a racist hate group. But since they are black that makes them not racist in the eyes of liberals.

Only progressive retards believe blacks can't be racist, liberals just feel so much white guilt they don't feel comfortable criticizing blacks.

I have no such problem.

I honestly think anyone who feels "white guilt" doesn't belong anywhere near politics. We don't need d-bags feeling guilty for shit they didn't do that happened over a century ago. Feel guilty for your own actions. If we decided to feel guilty for the actions of people in the past then quite literally every single race in existence should feel massive massive amounts of guilt.