The_Tempest
Senior Member
Originally posted by Sinious
@ TempestFor a guy who invested 10 years in these forums trying to create a Sidious alike image(which I would admire if you hadn't failed at pulling it off), you get ugly in debates way too fast. Its as if you are everything you say Neph is.
Hey, an inexorable element of that image involves taking dipshits like you to the curb for your inane opinions. It's not exactly my fault; you make the choice time and again to defend lame-ass characters like Vitiate and feel compelled to engage in revisionist history to do so. What follows is an inevitable consequence of your foolishness. excellent
Originally posted by Sinious
Legend's quote has actually done what I couldn't myself which is refuting everything you said about Vitiate's TP.
LeGenD's quote comes from an in-universe, fallible source. Vitiate's mindhaxx of Revan and Malak was the product of a trap and preparation. Not to mention the fact that the guy who actually wrote the goddamn book supports my opinion, which is why {again) my interpretation is infinitely more reliable and precise than your irretrievably biased fumblings.
Though I do appreciate the fact that you openly admit you couldn't refute any of my points. 👆
Originally posted by Sinious
LOL I never denied that.
Kinda makes this argument pointless when you don't deny that Vitiate tried to neutralize Revan from the beginning and dedicated tremendous energy to doing so.
Which is further evidence of the monumental stupidity you evince every time you enter the fray to defend this Sidious-wannabe.
Originally posted by Sinious
Except the novel supports my "speculations" where yours just lack quality.
Except it doesn't. If it does, you're welcome to quote the relevant passages. 😉
Originally posted by Sinious
I'd like to point to Legend's quote again.
And I'll just point again to the fact that Vitiate mindhacked Revan and Malak with ample time to prepare on a dark side nexus, as Revan expounds ad nauseam. I'll also refer you to the commentary from the hack who wrote this shit in the first place, who not-so-coincidentally agrees with me.
Does it perturb you that I grasp the full nature of Vitiate better than you ever will? mmm
Originally posted by Sinious
Lets bring up some of the facts we know:1) Vitiate, in another instance used a fraction of his power to mindrape Revan and Malak and it is confirmed that he has taken care of dozens of other Jedi that faced him with his TP.
You mean Vitiate mindraped a Malak and Revan who were already on the precipice of the dark side... on a dark side nexus... with prep-time. 😂
Originally posted by Sinious
2) Revan says this time he knows Vitiate's tactics and that he has a new technique that can help him resist Vitiate's TP which is something no other force user has achieved before.
Uh-huh. And the text never specifies that this is what drove Vitiate to dedicate more energy to the attempt.
Originally posted by Sinious
3) Vitiate had already managed to overwhelm Revan with TP with a fraction of his power and he had no reason to believe Revan would be able to resist it this time.
Vitiate had prep-time before and Revan was already on the verge of dark side corruption. Per Revan, the text says Vitiate employed charged TK and charged TP to no effect. 😉
Originally posted by Sinious
4) Vitiate is defined by the fear of death and its stupid to think that an attack that exposes him to any kind of attack is his preferred attack especially since his lightning can get the same job done.
No one disputes that Vitiate was under the impression a charged TP attack would get the job done. The bottom line is that Vitiate employed charged attacks from the onset to neutralize Revan on a dark side nexus and failed the first 2 times. 👆
Originally posted by Sinious
So mindhaxx doesn't take that much effort yet it did against Revan. Revan is also the only person who had a defense against it which was unknown to Vitiate which tells any intelligent person that Vitiate was caught unexacting and therefor it gave Revan a chance to harm Vitiate which is an opportunity that SK will not have here.
It's amusing to see that all you're equipped with is naked speculation. All I'll point out to you, again, is the text where Vitiate employs charged attacks and fails and where the author agrees with me.
Originally posted by Sinious
So my past speculations in this thread are proven by multiple sources and the story itself also supports it. Disagreeing at this point is simply ignoring evidence.
Nah, your speculation is informed by more speculation. You offer nothing by way of concrete evidence and only offer interpretations which favor Vitiate but lack any stable foundation.
No one cares.
Originally posted by Sinious
Calm down pumpkin. When I first read it, I saw it as Vitiate preparing himself/getting in the mood to fight(or whatever) since he rarely gets off his ass to do anything let alone fight someone and then he simply waited for Revan to charge him for him to begin his attacks. I didn't pay much attention to it as I don't now since it has little significance. If its going to make you happy, I'll agree to accept however you see it.
We've already established that your reading comprehension leaves something to be desired. I accept your concession.
Maybe next time, you'll ease off the Vitiate wank and forgo the Hooked On Phonics experience. 😂
Originally posted by Sinious
Cause I never saw it as a charged attack but merely an attack that would give Vitiate the ideal distance for mindraping someone.
We've established that "what you see" is incredibly stupid. Maybe if you could learn to evaluate the text on its own merits rather than invent baseless bullshit to justify the failures of Vitiate, you'd have an easier time in this discussion. 👆
Originally posted by Sinious
And I've explained to you why the fight went that way even in this very post. You keep on yapping about how the fight went yet ignore the entirety of the dialogue in the novel and other sources. Your take on it is irrelevant when its already disproven. 👆
You've manufactured baseless and speculative explanations to justify why Vitiate performed so poorly against Revan. I can't stress enough the extent to which no one cares. Vitiate is inconsequential and your defense of him is even less meaningful. Every single point I've made is drawn directly from the source material, which is why the goddamn author supports it.
I like you, Sin, and you'll be a successful acolyte when you bend the knee. But the fact remains that every single time you defend this position, your cognitive functions drop to rival that of a celery stalk. Vitiate performed pretty lamely against Revan and them's the facts. Get over Vitiate, dude.
No one cares.