Originally posted by juggerman
Did I ask for a showing from Scarlet Witch affecting a Kryptonian before I stated I thought she could affect Superman?I'm not fishing for replies. You refused to answer certain questions of mine and refused to take the convo in the thread I made for it. You continue to act as if X should just get the benefit of the doubt. I'm fine giving it to him if that was the way it was done across the board here. It's not tho for some reason so it shouldn't be for him
But that's the direction of your logic when looked at another way, you might as well make that same argument. The fact that you are inconsistent with it (as per your Scarlet Witch reply), only demonstrates how you can't seem to see the flaw in your logic.
And for the record, I didn't refuse to reply to certain questions of yours, I refused to go to another (irrelevant) thread to argue the same circular debate you seem stuck with. But as for this thread, I replied to every post you made. If you're going to make an accusation, best be accurate about it.
It's not "the benefit of the doubt". There is both logic and evidence that infer that we are correct.
This is a hypothetical battle where the characters are different and most likely will never meet in a real scenario. As much as we can, we try and argue using absolute truth, but we use the best evidence we can. Thing is, you've presented zero, zilch, nil, nadda evidence whatsoever to present your argument. And gone with the whole "absence of evidence is evidence of absence" route, although the logic we have presented can be VERY EASILY extrapolated from existing evidence from on screen showings.
There can be no absolute evidence in this case (being a hypothetical scenario between two completely different works of fiction), just the best argument with the best logic possible using the best evidence available.