Martin Luther King Jr.

So he's not the man people think he is/was?

no. surprisingly enough, like nearly every other case where the majority of mainstream humans agree on something, they just so happen to be wrong.

Originally posted by red g jacks
no. surprisingly enough, like nearly every other case where the majority of mainstream humans agree on something, they just so happen to be wrong.

It's because of our methodology to encompass information though, not for some uneducated mass theory.

red g jacks's description is.... exaggerated, but yea, it turns out you don't have to be a saint to do some really, really, really important good stuff.

All I know for sure, if Martin Luther King Jr was alive....he'd be on TI's side.

The fact that he kept company with frauds makes him suspect. Then you have all the hypocrisy, the lies he told, his stealing other people's work and claiming it for himself....he wasn't a good guy. But he was right.

Originally posted by Bardock42
All I know for sure, if Martin Luther King Jr was alive....he'd be on TI's side.

Originally posted by Bardock42
All I know for sure, if Martin Luther King Jr was alive....he'd be on TI's side.

...in all things.

ice cream man: strawberry, vanilla, or chocolate?

TI: ....vanilla....did i make the right choice martin?

MLK: you always make the right choice, TI. vanilla was my favorite as well.

TI: i'm sick of these darkies running our country into the ground, martin

MLK: me too, TI. me too.

Originally posted by Stoic
Then try to remember that we are all from the same race, and the stigma that you might feel may disappear. Who are you kidding man? Money is often behind the problems that cause people to struggle. Are you telling me that the disgruntled homeless person would still be as angry as they are if they were making enough to take care of the things that they need? I'm talking about basic effing needs here, and not luxuries.

The problem is it is not disgruntled homeless people that are usually out shooting at people in drive by's and such things.

I spoke to an intelligent man once, and he told me that he worked full time, and even over time, and after paying his bills, he could not eat. he told me that he had to occasionally steal toilet paper to wipe his ass from time to time. What then is he supposed to do in order to get by? Whites go through the same struggles when impoverished and trying to put their best foot forward. Are you saying that the statistics are incorrect? Women are also paid less.

We are talking about apples and oranges here man. You are talking about people stealing toilet paper because they can't afford it. I'm talking about real crimes..like murder. I'm not saying a person has a right to steal, but those aren't the type of people to worry about. They are not the people who go out and kill others.

The people going out and shooting and killing other blacks aren't doing it because they need toilet paper.

What you fail to see, is that minorities weren't in control of America for an instant in the past. Are they supposed to be in positions that were handed down from those that were. I'm not talking about all of the time, but I'm talking about a lot of the time. You have to realize something, There was a time that minorities had to go to the fence in order to get a decent paying job, while a white person did not have to go through such harsh scrutiny. This remains true to this day in many cases.

I will never say that minorities don't have to deal with hardships that whites do not have to deal with. There is still discrimination out there in this country. But that doesn't erase the other things brought up though. There is too much violence committed by minorities against their own kind.

There is too much violence committed by minorities, period.

In America, the greatest threat to your safety is a white/Caucasian male age 16-67, no matter who you are.

That is non-sense. White men are 100% trustworthy. Especially if they have candy and a big white, windowless van.

Originally posted by Robtard
In America, the greatest threat to your safety is a white/Caucasian male age 16-67, no matter who you are.

Originally posted by long pig
They are 80% of the population and only commit 50% of violent crime.

They only get convicted for 50% of the violent crimes...big difference

Originally posted by long pig
They are 80% of the population and only commit 50% of violent crime.

Which makes what I said true. Thanks 👆

Well the devil is in the White City.

Originally posted by Robtard
Which makes what I said true. Thanks 👆

I wonder who commits an absolute disproportionate amount of violent crime compared to their population percentage?

Originally posted by Bardock42
They only get convicted for 50% of the violent crimes...big difference

Originally posted by long pig
Its only true because there are more of them.

I wonder who commits an absolute disproportionate amount of violent crime compared to their population percentage?

Regardless, you agree, the person you have most to fear from in America is a white/Caucasian male 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
Regardless, you agree, the person you have most to fear from in America is a white/Caucasian male 👆

Overall, black on black and black on white violence is higher than white on black.

So, you're actually pretty wrong.

First, we find that during the 2012/2013 period, blacks committed an average of 560,600 violent crimes against whites, whereas whites committed only 99,403 such crimes against blacks. This means blacks were the attackers in 84.9 percent of the violent crimes involving blacks and whites. This figure is consistent with reports from 2008, the last year DOJ released similar statistics.