Martin Luther King Jr.

Originally posted by Robtard
It was factually correct, as I wasn't specifically referring to "murders in the hood", "murders in Aspen during winter break" etc.

Good. That's all it was, I didn't imply that Caucasian males are all a bunch of murderous savages, that was other people's kneejerks. Really, I have no idea why so many whiteboys flipped out, when it's a statistic that can be looked up.

Lol, you're literally agreeing that what I said is correct, but still sour about it. Weird.

so it should apply to all demographics, regardless of age, race, class, etc.

it does not, thus it was a factually incorrect statement. it's really that simple.

the factually correct statement is that whites commit the majority of murders in the US. which isn't what you said, it was the stat you used to try to back up your factually incorrect statement that white males age 16-67 pose the greatest threat to your life no matter who you are. which, once again, just demonstrates a poor understanding of statistics.

i'm not flipping out, whitey. just disagreed with you. and if your stance is that whites commit the most murders in the US, then i agree. but once again... do you have a point? or are you just randomly citing stats for no reason?

Originally posted by red g jacks
i didn't say either one of those statements.

i'm too lazy to hunt down the stats so i'll just ask you... do you think someone who lives in the hood is more likely to be killed in the hood or to be killed while travelling outside that hood (presumably by a white guy 16-67)?

using the same logic: "obviously if we talk about a country which is 70% white, the number will reflect that fact"

why is that excuse valid when discussing the ethnic make-up of single neighborhoods but not when discussing the ethnic make-up of the country as a whole?

it's basically disingenuous because it's selectively dealing with stats in order to push some ideologically driven message. it's not a genuine assessment of which ethnic groups are more likely to pose a threat to your safety.

He got caught fudging numbers, whats new.

Originally posted by red g jacks
it wasn't factually correct, because you said "no matter who you are"

so it should apply to all demographics, regardless of age, race, class, etc.

it does not, thus it was a factually incorrect statement. it's really that simple.

the factually correct statement is that whites commit the majority of murders in the US. which isn't what you said, it was the stat you used to try to back up your factually incorrect statement that white males age 16-67 pose the greatest threat to your life no matter who you are. which, once again, just demonstrates a poor understanding of statistics.

i'm not flipping out, whitey. just disagreed with you. and if your stance is that whites commit the most murders in the US, then i agree. but once again... do you have a point? or are you just randomly citing stats for no reason?

You agree, don't agree and then agree again. Seems like you are flipping out.

BTW, my initial "flipping out" comment wasn't to you. So good job flipping out.

edit: As a Caucasian male in America, you better watch it,guy. Don't know what I might do.

The ultimate "save me post."

"I was not talking to you, but him!"

Originally posted by Robtard
You agree, don't agree and then agree again. Seems like you are flipping out.

BTW, my initial "flipping out" comment wasn't to you. So good job flipping out.

Originally posted by red g jacks
i'm sorry to hear about your reading problems. maybe try a tutor or something.

lol, alright pal

He gets caught again.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I finally figured this out last week and blocked him.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The ultimate "save me post."

"I was not talking to you, but him!"

I thought you had me on ignore, dude?

Originally posted by Robtard
I thought you had me on ignore, dude?

People who use ignore are weak and have no confidence in their argument and are unable to counter other people's.

Originally posted by jaden101
People who use ignore are weak and have no confidence in their argument and are unable to counter other people's.

I legit laughed.

Originally posted by jaden101
People who use ignore are weak and have no confidence in their argument and are unable to counter other people's.

Originally posted by jaden101
People who use ignore are weak and have no confidence in their argument and are unable to counter other people's.

Its fun to make Rob do flips.

Rob is a tard after all. Truth in advertising.

Originally posted by long pig
Rob is a tard after all. Truth in advertising.

Yet you couldn't prove me wrong 👆

The old "prove me wrong on the Internet."

Racist