Martin Luther King Jr.

According to your math 'you' have a 50% change of it being a white/Caucasian male that causes you harm in some fashion. So what I said is true 👆

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
...in all things.

ice cream man: strawberry, vanilla, or chocolate?

TI: ....vanilla....did i make the right choice martin?

MLK: you always make the right choice, TI. vanilla was my favorite as well.

TI: i'm sick of these darkies running our country into the ground, martin

MLK: me too, TI. me too.

😂

Also, has anyone noticed how crime ridden every street named after mlk turns out to be?
There's one in my city and God knows you ll be robbed if you go down it.

Intellectually dishonest as always. I expect nothing less from you.

Originally posted by Robtard
According to your math 'you' have a 50% change of it being a white/Caucasian male that causes you harm in some fashion. So what I said is true 👆

Originally posted by long pig
Also, has anyone noticed how crime ridden every street named after mlk turns out to be?
There's one in my city and God knows you ll be robbed if you go down it.

This is true, every city has an MLK street and its always the worst street in town.

You're the one that posted the figures, gumo.

Originally posted by Robtard
In America, the greatest threat to your safety is a white/Caucasian male age 16-67, no matter who you are.

America as a whole

Originally posted by Robtard
America as a whole

Originally posted by red g jacks
not if you live in the hood

Crime statistics prove otherwise.

The idiot above you is race baiting and trolling.

Blacks commit more crimes then anyone else based on size of their population to the amount of crimes committed.

Originally posted by Robtard
America as a whole

you really think if you live in lets say detroit that you are more likely to get killed by a white male 16-67 than any other demographic?

cause that sounds pretty delusional to me.

He's a troll. I finally figured that out.

Originally posted by red g jacks
not if you live in the hood

"If you're surrounded by X race the chances of that race committing the majority of crime in that area rises". News at 11.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
What a meaningless statement. If you live in a red-neck trailer park the percentage of crime committed by whites rises astronomically.

"If you're surrounded by X race the chances of that race committing the majority of crime in that area rises". News at 11.

Do you know what a red herring fallacy is?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Crime statistics prove otherwise.

The idiot above you is race baiting and trolling.

Blacks commit more crimes then anyone else based on size of their population to the amount of crimes committed.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He's a troll. I finally figured that out.

My comment had to do with overall percentage and you're more likely to get killed by a male Caucasian than anyone else in America, not getting into specific geography of city/states.

No need for insults. Though you say "idiot" and "troll" to anyone who disagrees with you and proves you wrong.

Originally posted by red g jacks
you really believe that?

you really think if you live in lets say detroit that you are more likely to get killed by a white male 16-67 than any other demographic?

cause that sounds pretty delusional to me.

Again, American as a whole.

Obviously as pointed out by Tzeen, if you pick a very specific location where it's 80%+ Asian, Black or whatever, the number changes.

then "no matter who you are" is inaccurate

because if you are somebody who lives in the hood, the statement doesn't apply

and since america "as a whole" is majority white.... the statement in general is more or less meaningless

Originally posted by red g jacks
then "no matter who you are" is inaccurate

because if you are somebody who lives in the hood, the statement doesn't apply

and since america "as a whole" is majority white.... the statement in general is more or less meaningless

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that "hood people" didn't travel and I wasn't referring to "killed in your neighborhood". Again, obviously if we talk about very specific locations the number will change depending on the ethnicity of said location.

The statement is factually correct, so how is it meaningless?

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that "hood people" didn't travel and I wasn't referring to "killed in your neighborhood".

i'm too lazy to hunt down the stats so i'll just ask you... do you think someone who lives in the hood is more likely to be killed in the hood or to be killed while travelling outside that hood (presumably by a white guy 16-67)?

Again, obviously if we talk about very specific locations the number will change depending on the ethnicity of said location.

The statement is factually correct, so how is it meaningless?

why is that excuse valid when discussing the ethnic make-up of single neighborhoods but not when discussing the ethnic make-up of the country as a whole?

it's basically disingenuous because it's selectively dealing with stats in order to push some ideologically driven message. it's not a genuine assessment of which ethnic groups are more likely to pose a threat to your safety.