Originally posted by red g jacks
it's basically disingenuous because it's selectively dealing with stats in order to push some ideologically driven message. it's not a genuine assessment of which ethnic groups are more likely to pose a threat to your safety.
or you're just trying to fudge figures which concentrate underclass black people together while taking an overall average for white people regardless of class. yeah that's not dripping with ulterior motive.
Originally posted by red g jacks
i didn't say either one of those statements.i'm too lazy to hunt down the stats so i'll just ask you... do you think someone who lives in the hood is more likely to be killed in the hood or to be killed while travelling outside that hood (presumably by a white guy 16-67)?
using the same logic: "obviously if we talk about a country which is 70% white, the number will reflect that fact"
why is that excuse valid when discussing the ethnic make-up of single neighborhoods but not when discussing the ethnic make-up of the country as a whole?
it's basically disingenuous because it's selectively dealing with stats in order to push some ideologically driven message. it's not a genuine assessment of which ethnic groups are more likely to pose a threat to your safety.
I never said the stat wasn't because of America being largely Caucasian. Caucasian males still kill more overall, as a group.
It's funny, there's countless post of people talking about how violent black people/ brown people are, it's seemingly alright.
I point out that you're more likely to get killed by a male Caucasian in America as a whole(not just in one poor section of Detroit), statistically speaking, and suddenly the tears start flowing. "You can't say that!" -Whitey
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
or you're just trying to fudge figures which concentrate underclass black people together while taking an overall average for white people regardless of class. yeah that's not dripping with ulterior motive.
Originally posted by Robtardlol, please.
I never said the stat wasn't because of America being largely Caucasian. Caucasian males still kill more overall, as a group.It's funny, there's countless post of people talking about how violent black people/ brown people are, it's seemingly alright.
I point out that you're more likely to get killed by a male Caucasian in America as a whole(not just in one poor section of Detroit), statistically speaking, and suddenly the tears start flowing. "You can't say that!" -Whitey
i'm just pointing out the obvious. you are more likely to be killed in a majority white country by a white person... shocking. you are more likely to be killed in a majority black neighborhood by a black person.... also shocking. in other news, water is still wet.
funny thing is, if we really want to talk about race and crime statistics, black people are more likely to be killed by other black people than white people are to be killed by ANY race. by a pretty wide margin. regardless of their socio-economic status.
reminds me of how someone posted a thread a while back saying that black americans are much more likely to be murdered than white americans.... and then proceeded to suggest they were largely being murdered by white police, while the reality is they are mostly killed by black criminals.
all i did was point out why your statement was disingenous
i'll give you this: it's not completely meaningless. it literally means that overall more murders are committed by white men.
this does not, however, mean that white men 16-67 are the most dangerous demographic to you no matter who you are
that's what you said, and it's incorrect. that stat doesn't back up that statement. it only demonstrates that you have a hazy understanding of statistics. because if you are black man in a certain age demographic, statistically you are much more likely to be killed by another black man in said age demographic. so your statement only applies to the vast majority of whites and a minority of non-whites who live in mostly white areas. it doesn't apply to a good chunk of the population, which you choose to dismiss or ignore because you're a condescending white racist who doesn't care about black deaths. see... i can spin shit too. whitey.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I love to see Rob get creamed in a debate and then his racism comes out against caucasians.
Creamed? Red Jacks just agreed that my statement wasn't meaningless in the point that it was meant 👆
Originally posted by red g jacks
i'll give you this: it's not completely meaningless. it literally means that overall more murders are committed by white men.
How am I racist by stating an observed statistic? BTW, I'm also Caucasian 👆
your original statement was actually incorrect.. specifically the "no matter who you are" part
your general point that whites commit the most murders overall is factually correct and thus not meaningless... though what you can extrapolate from that is another question... as well as what larger point you were trying to make
but sure, if that's all you need for a technical victory to satisfy you, then do your thing, mayweather. as for me i come on here to talk shit and discuss actual ideas...
Originally posted by red g jacksIt was factually correct, as I wasn't specifically referring to "murders in the hood", "murders in Aspen during winter break" etc.
your original statement was actually incorrect.. specifically the "no matter who you are" partyour general point that whites commit the most murders overall is factually correct and thus not meaningless... though what you can extrapolate from that is another question... as well as what larger point you were trying to make
but sure, if that's all you need for a technical victory to satisfy you, then do your thing, mayweather. as for me i come on here to talk shit and discuss actual ideas...
Good. That's all it was, I didn't imply that Caucasian males are all a bunch of murderous savages, that was other people's kneejerks. Really, I have no idea why so many whiteboys flipped out, when it's a statistic that can be looked up.
Lol, you're literally agreeing that what I said is correct, but still sour about it. Weird.
Originally posted by red g jacks
but sure, if that's all you need for a technical victory to satisfy you, then do your thing, mayweather. as for me i come on here to talk shit and discuss actual ideas...
You actually figured Rob out, I finally figured this out last week and blocked him. He only comes here for an ewin, and to punch holes in arguments rather then actually discuss the issues as a whole, and he just loves do it, also he isn't white.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You actually figured Rob out, I finally figured this out last week and blocked him. He only comes here for an ewin, and to punch holes in arguments rather then actually discuss the issues as a whole, and he just loves do it, also he isn't white.
LoL, what a troll.
Reported.