Originally posted by Adam Grimes
I'm not dismissing his theory though, it's just that there's no evidence to support it whatsoever.Possible but not likely.
Again, the problem is not that the misoginy angle can be right, but it's still not enough to justify what happened, so it can be always highlighted as secondary in this case. I do think is a valid concern, but since it's quite secondary, imposing it into the discussion from the get to go will strike most people as radical.
There is nothing radical about discussing misoginy when we are obviously addressing poorly educated children, the very fact that they will draw into social opinions to get their twisted relationship with reality makes it a fair evaluation.
Originally posted by Henry_Pym
Is this a joke thread? That seems like poor taste but the "misogyny" angle can't be serious. I mean lol at the idea society is anti-women...Biological women are far more protected that any other gender. I mean when was the last time you saw a group of women talking about how biological men are far more at risk of nearly all crimes including rape, how male children are far more at risk of physical abuse by mothers, fathers or literally any demographic or how men outnumbered women in suicide 4-to-1. But I guess that doesn't matter because men are privileged with those stats.
The society can be anti-man for something and anti-women for other thing, obviously.