Originally posted by Philosophía
let's simplify this: how many writers would have him be a good match against darkseid? Do you think more than 2 or 3 out of dozens wouldn't?Geoff johns currently has anti monitor and darkseid as peers. Do you think it's a coincidence superman is on apokolips throughout the story, away from them?
Remember how the same geoff had young superman as the go to guy for fighting him in the early jla?
I'm gonna say straight off I haven't read the book, so I honestly can't speak too much on feats or showings in it obviously.
It is Johns though, so I feel confident in saying that I wouldn't be surprised if he ended up having Superman get involved. Johns, as great a writer as he is (and he is genuinely one of my favourites, and I'll defend him as such), has a tendency to let the story take precedence over the characters and to drive the characters far more than it should.
Though seeing as we're on the subject, I feel I should rant a bit. I know you and I don't always see eye to eye on what the right portrayal is of the character, but I've never gotten the impression from you that you didn't "get" the character. At least in terms of how I see it, anyway.
Reading threads on KMC, I see a lot of people and within one or two posts regarding the character, I just know that they're not looking at it in what I would see is the proper way, and their appreciation for the character, or at least their understanding, is a tad flawed.
Take the holding back thing.
Any time it's brought up that Superman holds back, what's the first thing you hear? Oh, Thor does that too. Surfer holds back just as much. If J'onn wanted to he could f*cking end Superman so easily.
To me, it's one of those things that displays a fundamental misunderstanding of the character, and it makes me less likely to take seriously what they're saying in the first place.
Do these characters hold back? Of course they do. Thor doesn't try to cave a person's head in with a hammer the second he meets them. Surfer doesn't try to create black holes in your face. Diana doesn't always try to gut you with a magical sword.
Superman isn't a crime-fighter. Not in the same sense that someone like Batman or Captain America is. He isn't a warrior, like Thor or Wonder Woman. He's not a cop, or a reformed criminal. He's not avenging dead relatives or trying to wrong injustice.
He's literally a guy that started saving people just because he realised that he could, and that if he didn't, who would? Sure, he shares some of his qualities with characters like Spider-Man, The X-Men and even guys like Aquaman and the Inhumans, but for the most part, there isn't another hero in mainstream comics that is the same concept as a whole.
Superman doesn't like fighting. He's not a pacifist, and he recognises a need for violence, but he only uses it as a last resort. When a villain is stomping through midtown or whatever, Superman doesn't wade in throwing punches. He doesn't call them fat or make momma jokes. He doesn't want to beat the piss out of them, and you can see it when he takes point for the League. Sure, there's the inevitable "stand down" moment, but with Superman, it's not a threat. He's not saying "stand down or i'll break your ****ing legs". He's saying "maybe if you stand down, we can talk about this and I can help you" instead.
Superman wants to save everyone. That includes his villains. Sure there are exceptions like Doomsday and Darkseid, but for the most part, even Superman would rather Lex just try to see his point of view and to not be such an insecure ass about everything.
So when people say Superman holds back, if they have what I believe to be a fundamental understanding of the character, then they know it's not the same. Superman doesn't pull his punches in the same way, because Superman's default isn't to punch as hard as he can from the offset. He didn't grow up fighting frost giants or greek gods. He grew up on a farm. He doesn't want to punch you in the face, even if you deserve it. Sure, if he hit you with all of his strength, he would kill you, but his mentality is more like Bruce Banner's than it is Thor's.
Anyway, bleh.
==============
On topic, sure, you can say that Superman operates at a higher level than heralds. The problem is that doing so makes debates utterly pointless. It's why OWAW is treated separately for threads, as is WBH and that whole worldbreaker arc. A good number of writers over the years have treated Superman like a herald, and if you average it down in a dirty, bloody way, you get someone that's around high herald, low trans, imo.
Is he capable of more? Sure, but the alternative is re-examining his place on the forum in a huge way.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
DS and Aquaman:Cyborg and the white noise cannon:
😂