California shooting

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
How many terrorist attacks would it take here in the US and Europe to admit we are in fact at war with some form of Islam?

How does this mentality help in any form though? <---Legitimately asking you to sell me on the idea here

The way I see it and you're free to pick it apart, what's the point of going "look, it's Islam!", it does not nothing but fuel fires and create gaps with some of our own citizens and allies. Groups like ISIS an Al Qaeda will still be doing what they do regardless.

Maybe, but it's time to start agreeing that the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist group.

I think Muslim terrorist groups are like Hydra in the MCU. You cut off one head, another takes its place. This would be a Neverending war.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Maybe, but it's time to start agreeing that the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist group.

Not sure I ever commented on the MB being not terrorist or even showed that I somehow favor them. They have a dangerous mindset, as I think any person or group than wants to instill a religion in place of a proper government is questionable.

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
I say send all us rednecks into ISIS country with no limit hunting license and we'll straighten this mess out. We can pretend how aDale Earnhardt died was a terrorist attack.

You didn't really ask a question it seemed it seemed rhetorical.

Originally posted by Jesus McBurger
For every kill you get. you get one beer or mountain dew

Lol...that works

FBI just labeled it an official act of terrorism.

So funny the media tried so hard to make it work place violence.

It did look like work place grudge related violence at first, considering one of the suspects worked there and it was said he had an altercation with someone at the party before the massacre.

As noted by a few people, this is the least 'Islamic Jihad Durrka Durrka' attack we've heard about, it's like these people failed terrorism 101. It took only a few hours for people to know the who/what/why in the Paris attacks.

This only looked like work place violence if you really wanted it to look that way.

It seemed above and beyond that especially when the explosive devices entered the discussion in addition to multiple shooters.

^👆

Yea the wife didn't work there. And she was the ring leader. So how on earth was it workplace violence or ever suspected.

As I said earlier he got pissed about Christmas and decided to advance the timeline.

Which wasn't known until later...

It seems like anything short of the media immediately going "terrorist Islamic attack!" right off the bat is unacceptable. Shit happened, there was confusion, pieces started slowly falling into place.

Dude assault rifles, tactical gear and pipe bombs isn't work place violence, just stop.

Not sure why having that excludes workplace shootings. Is there some rule?

Don't play games with me, I guess you would call it a workplace bombing too.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Dude assault rifles, tactical gear and pipe bombs isn't work place violence, just stop.

I don't know. Probably some crazy dude out there would put a pipe bomb under his boss' car if he didn't get that promised pay raise and promotion.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Don't play games with me, I guess you would call it a workplace bombing too.

No games are being played, already pointed out the reasons why "workplace violence" was a possible reason early when this happened, before more and more info came out.

Oh well, this is semantics.

It was terrorism

Now that we know more and more, without a doubt.

Lawyers for the family

"We can't have Obama say everytime there is a shooting say we need to ban more guns."