Originally posted by Surtur
But I would still think people would just turn to criminals to get their guns. On that note, why would criminals not see the opportunity for profit?Doesn't mean there will be an illegal gun seller on every corner like there was with the speak easies, but why would a gun nut not turn to criminals to purchase weapons if the government banned them?
Especially when a good number of them have a fundamental misunderstanding of the 2nd amendment.
"Fundamental misunderstanding of the 2nd AMendment". LMFAO. ONly left-wing idiots could possibly be stupid enough to "misunderstand" something that's clear as day as the 2nd amendment. 👆
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
FBI just labeled it an official act of terrorism.So funny the media tried so hard to make it work place violence.
I actually heard that some liberal media sources at first try to make it out to be some kind of "militia group" who viewed the government as the enemy. LOL.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Oh well, this is semantics.It was terrorism
Yep.
Second US terrorist attack in a pretty short time, no less (the PP shooter was one too).
Confirms that Daesh needs to go down, hard, but we already knew that.
Also a reminder that we should help other people who are in Daesh's sights. This is what they have to deal with on a regular basis, this is the type of thing they're trying to escape from.
Originally posted by Star428
"Fundamental misunderstanding of the 2nd AMendment". LMFAO. ONly left-wing idiots could possibly be stupid enough to "misunderstand" something that's clear as day as the 2nd amendment. 👆
And yet you still see people, even here, who just don't actually understand it.
So the fact you think it is clear as day should make you super angry that anyone could have even a bit of trouble not grasping what the amendment was intended for.
Also why are their lawyers opening their mouths about anything? The people are dead.
Originally posted by Robtard
It did look like work place grudge related violence at first, considering one of the suspects worked there and it was said he had an altercation with someone at the party before the massacre.As noted by a few people, this is the least 'Islamic Jihad Durrka Durrka' attack we've heard about, it's like these people failed terrorism 101. It took only a few hours for people to know the who/what/why in the Paris attacks.
Yeah well I'm guessing to the families of those killed these subhuman pieces of shit played the role of terrorist just fine.
The only silver lining, if you could even call it that, is that those killed apparently didn't have to listen to these pathetic pieces of crap spouting off at the mouth about their non-existent deity.
Originally posted by Surtur
But I would still think people would just turn to criminals to get their guns. On that note, why would criminals not see the opportunity for profit?Doesn't mean there will be an illegal gun seller on every corner like there was with the speak easies, but why would a gun nut not turn to criminals to purchase weapons if the government banned them?
Especially when a good number of them have a fundamental misunderstanding of the 2nd amendment.
They would turn to criminals, but that both, one, still limits availability, and two, leads a trail direct to criminal organizations that cops can follow. Crack down on an illegal dealer, and then all the criminals in an area have more difficulty getting guns.
I mean, here's some gun control statistics for you, and by which I mean 'the laws in every state and their rate of gun deaths':
There's a pretty strong correlation between laxer gun laws and more deaths, though other stuff is a factor like population densities and such.
Hawaii would have the easiest time- simply trying to get guns to an island takes more effort, so more gun control there would have a lot easier time shutting off guns than a state with big borders.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Funny this has nothing to do with guns.It has to do with shit heads disowning their baby in the name of Islam.
Who had tons of guns.
Now it seems likely that they'd try something anyway, they'd just be unlikely to get as many casualties without easy access to guns- and additionally, as the FBI had some idea of them, they may have been caught in trying.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
How about banning online purchases of guns since that is where they bought everyone one of them.Sounds like common sense.
That sounds like very sensible gun control!
I'm with you there, good thinking.
I don't think you get it. Whatever they can do to destroy America including taking away our rights is a victory for Isis.
Gun availability is something that Isis cares little about, and which won't destroy America, and will prevent a lot of Americans from dying in general.