Don't know if this has already been posted, but apparently there were some media shenanigans with the shooters' house: http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2015/12/what-the-hell-just-happened-on-msnbc/418893/
Don't know if this has already been posted, but apparently there were some media shenanigans with the shooters' house: http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2015/12/what-the-hell-just-happened-on-msnbc/418893/
I don't believe that, they know our laws, they are a smart effective enemy, if taking us down by taking us down through stricter laws, then they will do that.
Their goal is domination in whatever means necessary. I know you have said before ISIS cares very little about us.
Clearly that is not the case.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Don't know if this has already been posted, but apparently there were some media shenanigans with the shooters' house: http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2015/12/what-the-hell-just-happened-on-msnbc/418893/
Yes the FBI turned the house over the residence, meaning landlord, and he then let the media in, actually its a good thing this happened.
Originally posted by red g jacks
i love how omega vision is too big to talk to me about college protests yet not too big to endlessly bicker with star and ti over partisan bullshitjust another dime-a-dozen ideologue pumped out by western academia
Lol, nice troll attempt by the way.
lol... if it were mere disinterest then you would've simply ignored it
instead you came in, shouted "you don't know why they're really protesting!", and then left
if you just didn't post in my thread... of course i wouldn't have called you out. but instead you felt the need to come in and say "i disapprove" and then dash out because you know you don't have a leg to stand on. how stupid must you think we all are that we can't see through such transparent bullshit?
Originally posted by red g jacks
lol... if it were mere disinterest then you would've simply ignored itinstead you came in, shouted "you don't know why they're really protesting!", and then left
if you just didn't post in my thread... of course i wouldn't have called you out. but instead you felt the need to come in and say "i disapprove" and then dash out because you know you don't have a leg to stand on.
And this is the last I'm saying about the matter.
and i can tell from your tactics that you think disengaging makes you look like the bigger man... but i have some bad news for you... you lack the self control to make that policy work. cause it's cancelled out by the fact that you feel compelled to announce it. it's clear that you care, and only try desperately to make it appear that you don't.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So funny liberal media trying to this was not ISIS.Let us make no mistake: This was an ISIS attack.
Because I've always felt it cheap of terrorist organizations to claim responsibility for lone wolf attacks simply because they inspired these lone wolves or once had a Skype conversation with them.
that is one of their strengths... the ability to inspire attacks like this without centralized coordination or control. as a centralized military force they're not nearly as strong as conventional western powers. but terrorists are smart enough to not rely on conventional force alone.
ISIS is waging an ideological battle. anyone who swears allegiance to the caliphate/islamic state is an ally to the cause. where as groups like the taliban who hold similar beliefs but have different political loyalties are not.
Hard to believe the guy was traveling to Saudi Arabia and marrying this radicalized female all because they were merely inspired by ISIS.
But yeah, I read she was swearing allegiance to them on Facebook or something.
At the end of the day it's terrorists that were either part of or heavily inspired by ISIS or were allies or whatever.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Serious question: is something an "ISIS attack" if the attacker was simply inspired by ISIS/had been in contact with them, or does it require actual ISIS direction/involvement?Because I've always felt it cheap of terrorist organizations to claim responsibility for lone wolf attacks simply because they inspired these lone wolves or once had a Skype conversation with them.
Did you know that abc, cbs and nbc cut all shows on and went right to the coverage and came up with the same story?
"Three white males with assault rifles attack a disabled facility."
Cops knew within 10-15 minutes they were Muslim and what their names were from police radio traffic.
The cable news networks are still saying "the motive is so unclear."
The media and Obama though this going to be their white whale.
Sadly it came out to be their worst nightmare.
When they finally have to fess up and say Isis is here, and we are at war with some form of Islam.