Originally posted by Juntai
Big enough that the 'multiverse' [universe] is represented as a tree of varying size. [Sometimes its barely taller than Thor.]Do you see Odin that fought Galactus as stronger or weaker than the Odin that fought Seth?
For that matter. Do you feel fighting Seth at the World Tree might have also caused the effects we saw there?
Notice a trend with these galaxy/universe/multiverse feats?
I mean just a couple stories before that he struggled with Thanos.
And as such this allows one to pluck a universe from it and place it somewhere else after it's detached from said dimension shrinker?
Weaker, because he was weakened during most of it.
And the World Tree wasn't even attacked to my recollection, though I'm not denying the drastic consequences of that.
You're barking up the wrong tree with these collateral damage feats. I'm not arguing for or against them as a basis for power. I'm just wondering what sort of actual proof you have to just go "Nope, doesn't count because this actually happened a long time ago!"
You're talking about a millenia old being in a universe that doesn't go through constant reboots, no shit he's going to have old feats both in universe and in old comics. To actually prove he grew weaker is a different story entirely though.
But it all revolves around Thanos. If it makes you feel better, maybe it was a good feat for Thanos. Maybe it wasn't.
Maybe some attacks just reach farther than others. Maybe some writers put bigger emphasis on attacks.