Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Vader already beat a better Grievous, so why is this a a thing? Ten more minutes of stupid from Antoine Bandele.
The only stupidity is you. If you had actually paid attention he clearly stated that the video uses Legends continuity only.
Anton Bandele is a genius on par with Jensaarai1. His videos are a joy to watch.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Above Jensari IMO.
Same. He does his videos ComicVine style where he always brings his evidence to the table instead of biased guessing. I like Jensaaurai's videos although some just make his standout Exar Kun Vs Darth Vader one all the more better. Like did we really need Yoda Vs Malak?
Originally posted by cs_zoltan
It's not hard to be better than Jensaarai1. But Antoine is actually not bad, he's mostly correct.
Agreed. Antoine for the most part is positive except for that collaboration he did with Reti4. I feel that wasn't entirely accurate although I can see where they were coming from.
Originally posted by TheNuisanceBird
Same. He does his videos ComicVine style where he always brings his evidence to the table instead of biased guessing.
On reflection yes, Antoine is a better analyst then Jensaarai1.
I wouldn't call it biased guessing though (except for a few times when he does let bias affect his judgement). Mostly I see him as willing to make his own interpretations. I like that, it shows imagination.
Originally posted by Syndicate
Another post lacking any reason other then "HURDURVADERWINSBECAUSEHE'SCOOL!!!"
Precisely.
Originally posted by Syndicate
Another post lacking any reason other then "HURDURVADERWINSBECAUSEHE'SCOOL!!!"
The fact that he's 80% of Sidious should be more than enough to solve this.
The fact that Vader is superior to almost every Jedi in the PT also. Including most Council members.
The fact that Vader's dueling skills do not become as affected after his injuries to the point you may think.
The fact that Fisto is able to defeat Grievous and the obvious knowledge that Vader's saber skills > Fisto's.
The fact that you weren't able to provide evidence that Kenobi had a hard time with Grievous, considering both the novel and the movie portray Grievous's defeat on his hands not nearly as difficult or hard-fought as with the likes of Savage or Ventress, who are both inferior to Vader.
Grievous is good, but people saying he's good enough to defeat someone like Vader is just imo ridiculous, considering what Vader has done, who he's apprenticed to and how powerful he is.
Originally posted by chilled monkey
On reflection yes, Antoine is a better analyst then Jensaarai1.I wouldn't call it biased guessing though (except for a few times when he does let bias affect his judgement). Mostly I see him as willing to make his own interpretations. I like that, it shows imagination.
Precisely.
What is your view on his collaboration with Reti4 about The Sith vs the Jedi.
Originally posted by Col. Valerian
The fact that he's 80% of Sidious should be more than enough to solve this.The fact that Vader is superior to almost every Jedi in the PT also. Including most Council members.
The fact that Vader's dueling skills do not become as affected after his injuries to the point you may think.
The fact that Fisto is able to defeat Grievous and the obvious knowledge that Vader's saber skills > Fisto's.
The fact that you weren't able to provide evidence that Kenobi had a hard time with Grievous, considering both the novel and the movie portray Grievous's defeat on his hands not nearly as difficult or hard-fought as with the likes of Savage or Ventress, who are both inferior to Vader.
Grievous is good, but people saying he's good enough to defeat someone like Vader is just imo ridiculous, considering what Vader has done, who he's apprenticed to and how powerful he is.
This.
Originally posted by Col. Valerian
The fact that he's 80% of Sidious should be more than enough to solve this.The fact that Vader is superior to almost every Jedi in the PT also. Including most Council members.
The fact that Vader's dueling skills do not become as affected after his injuries to the point you may think.
The fact that Fisto is able to defeat Grievous and the obvious knowledge that Vader's saber skills > Fisto's.
The fact that you weren't able to provide evidence that Kenobi had a hard time with Grievous, considering both the novel and the movie portray Grievous's defeat on his hands not nearly as difficult or hard-fought as with the likes of Savage or Ventress, who are both inferior to Vader.
Grievous is good, but people saying he's good enough to defeat someone like Vader is just imo ridiculous, considering what Vader has done, who he's apprenticed to and how powerful he is.
The fact that you continue to fail at realizing that this is sabers only.
The fact that Vader being 80% of Sidious's power means nothing without the feats to back it up.
The fact that this only applies in a force sense and this is a lightsabers only fight.
The fact that while this is true we can see his guard pierced by opponents who are far slower, less skilled and less aggressive then Grievous.
Except you have no proof that Vader's saber skills are superior to Fisto's and ignored the fact that Fisto had a form advantage over Grievous and Grievous had been injured prior to their fight.
The fact that you ignored my prior posts stating that Obi Wan's defenses were being overloaded by Grievous.
Because I'm a nice guy I'll post it again.
"Grievous, snarling fury, ramped up the intensity and velocity of his attacks - sixteen per second, eighteen - until finally, at twenty strikes per second, he overloaded Obi-Wan's defense." - Revenge of the Sith
Lol wut. You're reasoning for Vader being superior is because he's an apprentice of Palpatine and because he's "done stuff?"
Ngl this is pretty sad.