Vader vs Grievous

Started by Syndicate6 pages

Which is fine but feats are what matters unless you want to attempt to scale Vader's power off of what Sidious can do in regards to force storms though that's energy manipulations which is something Vader is unable to accomplish unamped due to the limitations of his suit. Also I understand that that was Sidious's theory but it doesn't change the fact that it's stated by official sources that Vader was less then what he was after losing his limbs.

It's fine. As I said above this forum gets to me sometimes.

How does power relate to skill though?

Ah I see what you mean. Fair enough though you should know it's my belief that Obi Wan was fighting at the peak of his abilities at the time after witnessing his master's death.

Council members? No, but lightsabers only I think they could give him a hell of a fight.

I don't care about levels of canon. Anything that doesn't contradict another source and is backed by at least one other source from a different medium is all equivalent to me. Obi Wan was able to recover in the way he did because he allowed himself to become an extension of the Force as stated in the novel.

Anakin was actually struggling to defeat Dooku until Sidious interfered in the fight and convinced him to embrace his rage.

Either loses to Coleman Trebor tbh. Grievous would get his ass handed to him by any council member, and Luke beat Vader but Luke would get his ass kicked by any council member.

Don't you guys just love Filoni's retarded statements about power levels?

Shadup.

NB4 Filoni says Anakin would lose to any council member because they're wiser and more masterful in the ways of the Force than him. The Forcecast would have a field day with that.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Don't you guys just love Filoni's retarded statements about power levels?

He's my favourite person in the universe.