Originally posted by Surtur
So again just because I'm curious: who do you feel has the more important uncomfortable-ness? Since if a trans and a legit female both feel uncomfy...well shit we have to bite the bullet and have one of these groups uncomfy. Why is it the females who are born females and aren't making a conscious choice to try to pretend they are a different gender..be the ones having the deal with being uncomfortable?Out of some more curiosity, how many people do you feel in South Dakota are trans gender versus how many females in that state are legit females? Surely a vast population of transgenders would be needed to justify putting their feelings above the normal women, right?
I am not addressing whose comfortability is more important.
Only that if the goal of this bill is to ensure the comfortability of people in gender segregated restrooms, it does not actually achieve that goal.
The reason being that many transgender people are indistinguishable from their cisgender counterparts.
A female-to-male transgender person appears to be a cisgender male.
If he is required to use the restroom that corresponds to his birth sex instead of his gender markers, then he will have to use a women's restroom.
This puts someone who appears to be a cisgender man in a restroom with women.
They will not know that he was born female, and will assume that he is a cisgender man in the women's restroom, making them uncomfortable.
If he was free to continue to use the men's restroom, there would be no problems.
He appears to be a cisgender man, so he would go completely unnoticed in a men's restroom.
Does this person look like he belongs in a women's bathroom? Yes or no? It is as simple as that.