Originally posted by Nibedicus
Let me get this straight...In this one reply, you claim:
-That something that is "impossible" to NORMAL HUMANS is somehow relevant in a discussion about fictional superhumans.
-That Bucky somehow didn't win against his "competition", like Widow (who he almost killed had Cap not intervened) or Falcon (who he took out of the fight within seconds). That he did "no damage" to them, although Falcon lost a wing and got tossed out and Natasha got herself shot and he had her dead to rights. And Cap. Well, see below.
-That Ozy, who had a good 2-3 seconds to clear 12-15 feet has somehow performed a superspeed "feat", and it was all done off screen. And it was superspeed even tho we never really saw what happened. All because Comedian couldn't hear where he was. Like it's impossible to take someone by surprise because you can be quiet. Quiet = superspeed, apparently.
-That Bucky did no damage to Cap:
-That Watchmen characters that punched thugs and cops are peak/superhuman but claim that BW who also beat up thugs, mercs, large security personnel as well as better trained military special ops (several times without using her tech on them and even once with her arms tied up) with even more ease (as many times, she had no help doing so) is somehow not because TECHZZZ!
-That Natasha only really does well only because she uses her tech. Even tho:
>In IM2, she beat (0:39-0:50) 3 opponents without using her tech and disables one more at (1:15),
>takes out 3 opponents while tied to a chair with no tech as well (2:15),
>beats up an armed out-to-kill Hawkeye without the use of her tech (4:00-4:50)
>takes out 3 armed HYDRA agents in H2H with precision strikes, only temp stunning one other via a stun disc and taking him out later h2h (7:01-7:14). In a skirt and heels of all things.But yeah, she only really does well with her techzzss!!!
-That Natasha isn't really strong even though she's fought larger opponents and took them down with one or 2 hits or fought superhuman opponents and took them down or at one point even grabbed onto a fast moving alien speeder with one hand, supporting her own weight against the sudden pull of the speeder's velocity.
-That Chitauri are not superhuman and are simply "military men" strong. Even tho, they jumped out of moving speeders 20+ feet in the air to land on the ground with little effort or get launched 50 feet to the side of a building and grabbed on with nothing more than their hands or when one Chitauri actually grabbed Cap (a bona fide superhuman), he couldn't really escape its grip without backflipping out of it. Because, let me guess, they have super strong leg strength and super strong grip strength but they's gots normal "military man" arm strengthz!!! That's all they have cuz: reasons! I'm sure, after all, these kinds of abilities are standard for "military men". /sarcasm
And of course, you gloss over the opponents they fought with unquestionable super strength "feats" (Ultron bots), because: morez reasonsz...!
-That fodder in Watchmen posed no threat to them and were "decimated" by them, only to admit in the next paragraph that Ror DID indeed get taken out by fodder and fodder WERE indeed a threat to him.
-That catching a bullet (that was heavily telegraphed), by moving one's arms fast automatically translates to someone being untouchable in a fight. Baseball pitchers must be closet MMA champs. And somehow blocking bullets don't count, because reasons. Because we don't block in fights. <--- altho, I will admit that this "feat" is awesome.
-That somehow Batroc did as well against Cap as he did because only the results matter and not how well you did against an opponent. After all, an opponent that lasts a full 5 championship rounds in MMA but loses in the end did just as well as that schmuck that lasted 15 seconds.
If there is any bias here, it has to come from the one who overblows his "feats" even though there is a lack of evidence. Downplays the other side's "feats" and abilities even tho there is a mountain of evidence to the contrary or even just downright ignores "feats" and showings.
Yeahhhhh, I wonder who's been doing that... hmm
Not sure where the whole BW argument is stemming from, but BW is obviously skilled with her tech or without. I think the point he was making was that she's more formidable thanks to her tech, which is undoubtedly true... doesn't mean she isn't skilled and dangerous without.
Further, her only other relevance is that again, she's not more formidable than RO and N.O. combined in h2h. So BW doing better against WS, comes into play in this regard. Why? Because I think it's rather obvious Ozy would've never been taken by surprise like that. Not only would he already know every single thing about her (it's ozy) he would've saw the sneak attack coming unlike WS. Who got disarmed and struggled initially.
That said, I'm still waiting for you to post the feats I asked for two pages ago when I commented on your post. You made the claim that WS has superior feats to Ozy in various areas. Every single person that has tried to make that claim has been proven wrong. Ozy has the superior feats by category. I listed them. Now, if you think not, post the feats that beat what I referenced on previous pages.