Thanos vs Apocalypse

Started by h1a813 pages

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
What are you talking about man? Like, literally half of this is completely untrue and in fact, the opposite.

Apoc is stronger than Thanos? Huh? Where did you get that from?

Thanos is basically high herald? Wow.

Thanos isn't much more durable than Thor? Ok, yeah, we should just stop here because all of this is wrong and I'm really not sure where you came to these conclusions as I can't think of a single thing Apoc has done that would make him physically stronger than the Hulk or adult Thor, not even close to Thanos.

Does anybody have a scan of Apoc's best strength feat? And if its a scan of him bullyimg Colossus then don't even bother.

Thanos is not much more powerful than a high Herald.

On average he's 1.5-2x a high Herald. That's not a lot. Superman can beat him. Gladiator can give him a good fight.

Apoc almost breaking Thor's spine in one hit proves that he is stronger than Thanos. Young adult Thor has the same durability as adult Thor unless you can prove different.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
i know, I've read the issue. And thats the thing, the only way you could make a case for Apoc is using high end showings only. And when one of your highest showings is beating a teenage Thor after sneak attacking him then your probably not going to do to well against someone who can take a beating from classic Odin.

Apocalypse is probably my favorite X-Men villian, but Thanos is a good bit beyond him, and will pretty much dominate Apoc from start to finish. I can't think of one offensive power that Apoc has that would really even damage Thanos.

Apoc is stronger. He heals instantly. He can take over Thanos tech.

Originally posted by h1a8
I remember it. Character statements are sometimes hyperbole. This doesn't mean that Beyonder's words were though.

Dimensions are intangible, so that makes no sense. But let's go with it since this is comics. The blast was concentrated on Beyonder. Beyonder absorbed the entire blast.

it wasn't hyperbole at all Beyonder was omnipotent.

You're real world logic fails here, Beyonder didn't absorb the blast at all. All you ever do is lie to try and prove your point.

Originally posted by One Big Mob
You realize you just posted the other two scans from a 3 image fight (that was in progress) where Sue came in and saw everything up till Thanos held Thanos at his collar and still maintain that they went to the astral plane? And you try to insult me when I'm being civil?

That was just to make it clear that the writers showed the fight in different ways. In Starlin's writing, both are enveloped in psychic auras and when Thanos defeats doppelganger in astral combat, he reverts back to physical body.

There is no need to cite words like "astral suicide" if it was a simple physical battle.

http://static.comicvine.com/api/image/2586504-warlockinfinitywatch10_19.jpg

On The very next page, it is made clear that the body is merely a husk.

The only possible way Sue could have seen everything and helped is if she also went to the astral plane, following your logic. And I already said she helped. You only posted that to try and lowball when all it does is prove you wrong.

Or the writers didn't consult each other. Infinity war and crusade were infamous for that.

And the words are entirely talking about Thanos worrying about what would happen if he killed his double. I don't... all that supports your stance is the word astral being said once. Nothing there supports it being a mental battle. There are now two full fights posted from when Thanos was in that state. Neither of them had mental battles. And especially the one you posted.

That's why I asked you to read the scans.

Yeah a surprise choke. He grabbed him with no warning and nothing came of it.

Really? The clone never tried to get free?

Masterson matched a punch from Thanos, because it's a hammer. Did you expect Thanos to punch through the hammer?

That was a snapshot of a long fight which mostly occurred off panel.

Quasar destroying his head is irrelevant, nor does it erase his feats from a comic.

Nobody said it does. It's still in consideration though.

A scene doesn't becomes non canon just because you don't like it.

Thanos was shown more powerful than the heroes, it's that simple. The clone was portrayed higher.

First thing, Quasar's constructs weaken after an assault. Second, Warlock assisted him in destroying the dome.

Third, it wasn't written by the actual writer of the fight where Thanos defeated the clone.

Just like I wouldn't say Starlin wrote Sue helping Thanos defeating the clone.

Sounds like you're the one who needs to get over something. Was your purpose to help Apocalypse in this thread or to try and spread false info that never needed to be said?

Haha, who said I wanted to help any character in this thread?

Bottom line, Thanos never punched through his clone.

Originally posted by abhilegend
That was just to make it clear that the writers showed the fight in different ways. In Starlin's writing, both are enveloped in psychic auras and when Thanos defeats doppelganger in astral combat, he reverts back to physical body.

There is no need to cite words like "astral suicide" if it was a simple physical battle.

http://static.comicvine.com/api/image/2586504-warlockinfinitywatch10_19.jpg

On The very next page, it is made clear that the body is merely a husk.

Or the writers didn't consult each other. Infinity war and crusade were infamous for that.

That's why I asked you to read the scans.

Really? The clone never tried to get free?

That was a snapshot of a long fight which mostly occurred off panel.

Nobody said it does. It's still in consideration though.

A scene doesn't becomes non canon just because you don't like it.

First thing, Quasar's constructs weaken after an assault. Second, Warlock assisted him in destroying the dome.

Third, it wasn't written by the actual writer of the fight where Thanos defeated the clone.

Just like I wouldn't say Starlin wrote Sue helping Thanos defeating the clone.

Haha, who said I wanted to help any character in this thread?

Bottom line, Thanos never punched through his clone.

So basically what you're saying is that apparently Sue watching and helping bring about the downfall to the clone doesn't count because it was just another writer and Thanos for sure was in the astral plane because the word astral was used?

Astral suicide was used because he was worried about what would happen to his own mind and spirit if he killed this clone. Him saying he is merely a husk is finding out that nothing would happen to himself. It's entirely explained in the scans you told me to read.
In fact the only thing in the scans that even begins to defend you is 2 words... so why you are telling me to read is weird. Not the mention you see nothing wrong or odd with "suicide" being used there. Because why would he say that in a mental battle he was entirely sure he was going to win?

The fight was never in the astral plane though. There is no proof that it was. You're essentially saying one depiction of the fight doesn't count because the word "astral" was used.
Not to mention the writer of the Sue fight was the editor in chief of the entire Infinity War event in Tom Defalco
I am of the firm belief that Tom consulted with Jim. The fight was not in the astral plane.

It was like a panel or two of a choke. He grabbed a sitting ally and choked him briefly in a surprise attack basically. You're putting way too much stock in that.

Of which Thor wasn't shown to stalemate Thanos. We however do have more to the battle in tie ins, but apparently tie ins don't count anymore if they provide more context.

I never said it was non canon, and that's exactly what you're trying to do with the Sue fight anyway.
It's just entirely irrelevant. "Hey, check out this low feat, crazy huh?" What purpose does this have? What purpose does arguing it have? It is not a consideration at all.

Quasar's constructs are only shown to weaken once they get cracked or he loses focus. They were never shown to crack, nor was he ever worried about it. And Adam Warlock was never shown to fire an attack, there was no green in that beam. All his showed was energy as in Warlock was ready to use the soul gem. And even if Warlock did help, the soul gem wouldn't exactly be the biggest help against something without a soul like a shield.
And even if we assume they split the blast 50-50 (even though again, no green was shown in the blast), that still makes Thanos more powerful than any two heroes there.
Either way you want to slice it, it doesn't matter.

It's also funny how you want to diminish that scene when you literally just said that a scene like that doesn't become non canon just because you don't like it.
I'd have to say a scene where normal Thanos battles normal people has a lot more relevant than showing how hopeless trying to defeat IG Thanos is. And I'd have to say that the context surrounding that battle that you yourself admitted was largely off panel should not become non canon.

And I was woefully misinformed on this new rule we have on characters from different writers not being able to be used. Apparently Starlin would have written Thanos a lot different than Gruen if he wrote that scene or something? The guy who wrote fp Thanos basically tanking IG punches would have had a problem with that?
This isn't a case where one writer decides to go off the deep end and do whatever he wants. There is not one tie in you could point to where one Thanos is more powerful than the other. There's not much difference besides the context other writers decide to include.

Nobody said you wanted to back anyone. Like I said, all you came to do was lowball and spread false information.

Let's reiterate here:
There is no proof of this battle happening in the astral plane. All Thanos was talking about was destroying his own self with killing the clone. Just because the word "astral" was used, that doesn't automatically mean a mental battle.
Tom Defalco, the editor in chief of the event and the editor in chief of Marvel wrote a tie in where Sue watched and helped Thanos defeat the clone the entire time he was supposed to be in the astral plane.

And that's it. That's all that needs to be said to tell that it never happened in the astral plane.

Abhi is envious of Thanos' feats because they are better than Superman's.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos is not much more powerful than a high Herald.

On average he's 1.5-2x a high Herald. That's not a lot. Superman can beat him. Gladiator can give him a good fight.

Apoc almost breaking Thor's spine in one hit proves that he is stronger than Thanos. Young adult Thor has the same durability as adult Thor unless you can prove different.

Where are you coming up with these numbers? You literally just made that up.

Yeah Adult Thor is both stronger and durable because Asgardians become stronger with age and more importantly, Thor does. Once again, something you just made up.

Apoc vs. Any high herald solo with some actual feats please?
I know what your doing. Trying to lowball Thanos and somehow bring Superman into this fight. Just like Carver does Hulk only with made up numbers.

I change my answer to Superman wins a Thanos vs. Apocalypse match.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Where are you coming up with these numbers? You literally just made that up.

Yeah Adult Thor is both stronger and durable because Asgardians become stronger with age and more importantly, Thor does. Once again, something you just made up.

Apoc vs. Any high herald solo with some actual feats please?
I know what your doing. Trying to lowball Thanos and somehow bring Superman into this fight. Just like Carver does Hulk only with made up numbers.

I change my answer to Superman wins a Thanos vs. Apocalypse match.

Prove that asgardians get more durable against physical attacks (after adulthood) as they get older. Scans?

Thanos never shown physical strength beyond the strongest high heralds. So saying that he is about 1.5-2x stronger than the average high Herald is very fair to him. Same goes for durability and other powers. Thor and BRB together can beat Thanos. Superman can beat Thanos.

I'm not lowballing Thanos. I didn't once mention a low showing from him.

How can Thanos beat someone that can heal instantly, has cutting weapons, can take over tech, is strong enough to damage Thanos.

Haha brb and Thor can beat Thanos, you are just the worst troll.

You're full arguments are just pure trash.

Originally posted by h1a8
Prove that asgardians get more durable against physical attacks (after adulthood) as they get older. Scans?

Thanos never shown physical strength beyond the strongest high heralds. So saying that he is about 1.5-2x stronger than the average high Herald is very fair to him. Same goes for durability and other powers. Thor and BRB together can beat Thanos. Superman can beat Thanos.

I'm not lowballing Thanos. I didn't once mention a low showing from him.

How can Thanos beat someone that can heal instantly, has cutting weapons, can take over tech, is strong enough to damage Thanos.


Odin put a seed in Gaea to create an heir that will one day surpass him in power. Whole basis for Odin sexing an elder god in the first place. So logically speaking, Thor should be more durable/stronger as he gets older. Just my two cents.

I"m a huge Thor fan and I do believe him and BRB could beat Thanos. With godblasts, wind of a thousand worlds etc. If he let them so it.

Apocalypse has nowhere near the offensive output of an all out Thor. Unless I am mistaken ( very possible ) I cant think of one single thing Apoc has done under his own power that would be a significant threat to Thanos.

You are correct in Apoc's badassery and powerset. It is pretty awesome but Thanos can do some of those things and more.

Marvel seems pretty consistent with Thanos being a bit above most earth based villians. Mags, Apoc, Ultron etc.

Do you feel like an Apoc could solo Thor and Hyperion at same time? I dont, but I do think Thanos could.

Anyway, i reread some of my posts and I sound like an *******, and for that I apologize, I just feel like calling Thanos barely a trans and that Apoc can beat him when he has never even beaten a major herald level character in a non pis fight is kinda lowballing Thanos. Apocalypse just doesent have the kinda offense imo.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Odin put a seed in Gaea to create an heir that will one day surpass him in power. Whole basis for Odin sexing an elder god in the first place. So logically speaking, Thor should be more durable/stronger as he gets older. Just my two cents.

There is another statement to but I can't remember context. Regardless, adult males >>>teenage males in strength and durability as they have denser muscle tissue, at least for humans butnas I can't back this up via scan im not gonna fight it.

Regardless, until Apoc can survive even 2 seconds against a classic Odin or Galactus, he has done nothing to say he cam beat Thanos level durability, which is far beyond a teenage Thor.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
I"m a huge Thor fan and I do believe him and BRB could beat Thanos. With godblasts, wind of a thousand worlds etc. If he let them so it.

Apocalypse has nowhere near the offensive output of an all out Thor. Unless I am mistaken ( very possible ) I cant think of one single thing Apoc has done under his own power that would be a significant threat to Thanos.

You are correct in Apoc's badassery and powerset. It is pretty awesome but Thanos can do some of those things and more.

Marvel seems pretty consistent with Thanos being a bit above most earth based villians. Mags, Apoc, Ultron etc.

Do you feel like an Apoc could solo Thor and Hyperion at same time? I dont, but I do think Thanos could.

Anyway, i reread some of my posts and I sound like an *******, and for that I apologize, I just feel like calling Thanos barely a trans and that Apoc can beat him when he has never even beaten a major herald level character in a non pis fight is kinda lowballing Thanos. Apocalypse just doesent have the kinda offense imo.

This except the thor brb thing

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
There is another statement to but I can't remember context. Regardless, adult males >>>teenage males in strength and durability as they have denser muscle tissue, at least for humans butnas I can't back this up via scan im not gonna fight it.

Regardless, until Apoc can survive even 2 seconds against a classic Odin or Galactus, he has done nothing to say he cam beat Thanos level durability, which is far beyond a teenage Thor.

There is absolutely no basis for assuming Apoc can't survive 2 seconds against Galactus or Odin in a comic. Hell, Thor bust Galactus helmet like nothing.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
I"m a huge Thor fan and I do believe him and BRB could beat Thanos. With godblasts, wind of a thousand worlds etc. If he let them so it.

Apocalypse has nowhere near the offensive output of an all out Thor. Unless I am mistaken ( very possible ) I cant think of one single thing Apoc has done under his own power that would be a significant threat to Thanos.

You are correct in Apoc's badassery and powerset. It is pretty awesome but Thanos can do some of those things and more.

Marvel seems pretty consistent with Thanos being a bit above most earth based villians. Mags, Apoc, Ultron etc.

Do you feel like an Apoc could solo Thor and Hyperion at same time? I dont, but I do think Thanos could.

Anyway, i reread some of my posts and I sound like an *******, and for that I apologize, I just feel like calling Thanos barely a trans and that Apoc can beat him when he has never even beaten a major herald level character in a non pis fight is kinda lowballing Thanos. Apocalypse just doesent have the kinda offense imo.

Apoc showed sufficient strength to damage Thanos. Almost shattering Thor's spine in a single hit is well above Thanos pay grade. Thanos nor anyone I can think of, outside WBH, could do something like that. It's fair to infer that Apoc could create cutting weapons that could cut Thanos. And what about Apocs ability to take over tech? No one is addressing that. Apoc can have Thanos tech go against himself or use it to aid himself.

I don't think Thanos can beat a non jobbing and well written Hyperion (without tp).

Lol what is it h1 doesn't understand about the one feat he's using for entire argument. The feat against Thor happened a very long time ago in continuity and he's never showed that lvl of power since.

FYI...Young Thor has survived direct hits from Gor who is a trans tier/skyfather level character and Young Thor kept fighting. Thor, even during his young days was hellava durable. High Herald durable. So Apocalypse almost breaking his spine is a beastly showing. Crazy showing.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Lol what is it h1 doesn't understand about the one feat he's using for entire argument. The feat against Thor happened a very long time ago in continuity and he's never showed that lvl of power since.
But what showings contradict that level of strength by Apoc? Is there any showings where he is shown physically weaker? If not then there is no contradiction.

While I have yet to see anything that Apoc has done to make me believe that he would defeat Thanos on solely a physical basis, I'm wondering why this discussion has suddenly become about physical strength? Thanos has many other powers that he could rely upon other than tech, and/or strength. Odin one shot KO'd the Surfer, but had to pour it on in a prolonged battle against Thanos, which shows without a doubt that Thanos has always been portrayed to be above this level of character. Apoc has proven that he would be a good fight for the likes of Loki, Thor, and a few others of that weight class. Galactus would absolutely destroy Apoc, Annihilus with his recent upgrade would tear him apart.

Tyrant would dance on his spine, and there is simply no way on Earth that Apoc would survive being blasted by Omega. Then we have Lord Mar-Vell and his entire Cancerverse crew losing to Thanos while in possession of a Cosmic Cube unit. Thanos surviving being hit several times by the CCU prior to beating Lord Mar-Vell, and what does Apoc bring to the table? Well let's see, Apoc was hurt by Black Bolt who only gave Thanos a bloody nose, and he looked good against Thor. Until Apoc has more showings and can actually prove himself, I can't see how this is anything more than a curb stomp in favor of Thanos.

Originally posted by h1a8
But what showings contradict that level of strength by Apoc? Is there any showings where he is shown physically weaker? If not then there is no contradiction.
yeah loads of showing, you would know this if you didn't go by word of mouth and had actually read some comics.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
yeah loads of showing, you would know this if you didn't go by word of mouth and had actually read some comics.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
Lol what is it h1 doesn't understand about the one feat he's using for entire argument. The feat against Thor happened a very long time ago in continuity and he's never showed that lvl of power since.

Well, Apocalypse did one shot Khul (who put down Avengers) and Scarlet Witch hexes didn't work on Khul.

Recently, in Secret Wars # 7, Apocalypse easily beat 2 Thors (it seems he also killed one) while having a conversation with Sinister's severed head.