FreshestSlice
Eternal Commander
Originally posted by The_Tempest
[B]Or we could read.Funny how the entry on the Sith inquisitor mentions that he "was once a slave," yet Valkoriate's says he "is an ancient Sith" even though he's no longer a member of their government or biology.
That's a pretty good argument, except I was talking abou their pressence on the Dark Council which no longer exists, not their life before the game even starts, lel.
You're free to ignore both precedent and the patently obvious. The fact that I haven't invested the same amount of time in the game as you have only serves to make your failure here all the more embarrassing.
Actually, you being free to ignore the actual story presented by the game for one piece of background information in a sentence in one codex entry with context for new players just makes you look obtuse. You've readily admitted at this point you're just ignoring everything else because it doesn't suite your argument, as far as I'm concerned. I for one realize what the codex says, but i also understand it's purpose and acknowledge what it likely means given all the other information I've been given. You on the other hand plug your ears because nothing else supports you, which is childish.
What I'm talking about is the fact that the codex acknowledges Valkoriate's relationship with archaic Sith principles but still identifies him as Sith.
No, it identifies him as a Sith entity, and given he was born a member of the sith species, was their emperor, and now an entity, it doesn't have to mean he's a member of the Sith Order or follows the Sith philosophy. Especially given all the evidence that says otherwise. And it will never change, regardless of what new information is given. Because that is how the codex works.