Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Dude, do yourself a favor and discontinue the conversation; you have no knowledge of physics and demonstrated this several pages back...Furthermore you've demonstrated a lack of knowledge in this thread as well as others...
Btw, get your facts straight in the future if you are going to debate; this post of yours I've quoted is so error filled that it borders on gross trolling...
You dont know what you are talking about...at all...save yourself from further embarrassment and just quietly vanish.
What sort of tom foolery is going on here. The crash wasn't as bad because Khan wanted to make it more brutal? LOL. Wtf. The clear elephant in the room is... you ealier claimed he had no control over the ship, which was to peddle your theory about how fast it was going, and by proxy thus Khan crashing had some crazy durability. Yet, he couldn't really make it more brutal like you're claiming now could he? After all he had no control right? It's simply fanboyism to dismiss one crash where humans had no issue surviving, and then claim another similar crash was vastly more potent. Ummm okay, based on what? Are you a producer or director of Star Trek and we are blessed to have you you here?
Further, you do realize that as fast as you're claiming Kirk and Khan were traveling in the orbital crash.. you do realize that kirk hitting what he did as fast as you're claiming he was going.. would've done more damage right?
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
What sort of tom foolery is going on here. The crash wasn't as bad because Khan wanted to make it more brutal? LOL. Wtf. The clear elephant in the room is... you ealier claimed he had no control over the ship, which was to peddle your theory about how fast it was going, and by proxy thus Khan crashing had some crazy durability. Yet, he couldn't really make it more brutal like you're claiming now could he? After all he had no control right? It's simply fanboyism to dismiss one crash where humans had no issue surviving, and then claim another similar crash was vastly more potent. Ummm okay, based on what? Are you a producer or director of Star Trek and we are blessed to have you you here?Further, you do realize that as fast as you're claiming Kirk and Khan were traveling in the orbital crash.. you do realize that kirk hitting what he did as fast as you're claiming he was going.. would've done more damage right?
Dude, take a lesson in reading comprehension; you are wrong about what you think I said..wrong.
I didn't say the things you said I did; get your facts straight, address my actual quotes and then we'll talk...
Also, learn to break your posts up into digestible pieces; reading your endless run on paragraphs is more difficult than it needs to be...
Originally posted by Juk3n
If khan survived a full on ship crash...
It must have taken something ENORMOUS to bring him down? Like...whats bigger than a ship crashlanding?I havnt seen the movie, someone fill me in, what was it that finally brought down this behemoth man who can endure the vacuum of space and head on ship crashes?
😂 👆
Originally posted by Juk3n
If khan survived a full on ship crash...
It must have taken something ENORMOUS to bring him down? Like...whats bigger than a ship crashlanding?I havnt seen the movie, someone fill me in, what was it that finally brought down this behemoth man who can endure the vacuum of space and head on ship crashes?
This seems like a spite thread, a being that can survive all that against someone whos main offesnive output is blunt force trauma. Lol OP spite for spite sakes, hate Marvel a little more please.
A very attractive phone operator.
Originally posted by Robtard
Yah, he's now saying the Vengeance was traveling at 20,000mph when it hit water, let alone slide onto land. He's just having a goof; likely mocking quan.
Oh really....? Thats strange, because I feel that 20k mph is a conservative estimate...
Tell me, whats the average velocity of an asteroid impacting into the Earth?
Once you answer that question, did you know that an impactor from space will be accelerated further by the Earth's gravity well once it gets close enough to our planet?
How fast do you think Vengeance was traveling since you believe my number is ridiculous?
You have ZERO proof of how fast it was going is the point LOM. You can't seem to get around this fact. Khan clearly still had some control of it.. meaning it wasn't just barreling down from the sky with no control. It wasn't doing a nose dive straight down. He was controlling it to some degree, and thus, it wasn't just traveling through space like an asteroid would impacting earth.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You have ZERO proof of how fast it was going is the point LOM. You can't seem to get around this fact. Khan clearly still had some control of it.. meaning it wasn't just barreling down from the sky with no control. It wasn't doing a nose dive straight down. He was controlling it to some degree, and thus, it wasn't just traveling through space like an asteroid would impacting earth.
I know the average velocity of an object in Earth's orbit and I know falling into Earth's gravity well will cause further acceleration...
Based on that I believe 20k mph is a conservative estimate...
But humor me Thanosi, how fast do you think it was going? 20 mph? 50 mph? 100 mph?
You dont trust my numbers, but do you trust NASA's?
Space debris, which appears to just float around in space,is actually moving an incredible velocity...see what NASA has to say about it:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/news/orbital_debris.html
Come on dude, you keep calling me wrong, but every number you can find pertaining to this topic points favorably towards my argument....
Tell you what, do some research on the velocity of objects in space and get back to me...
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You have ZERO proof of how fast it was going is the point LOM. You can't seem to get around this fact. Khan clearly still had some control of it.. meaning it wasn't just barreling down from the sky with no control. It wasn't doing a nose dive straight down. He was controlling it to some degree, and thus, it wasn't just traveling through space like an asteroid would impacting earth.
Impactors almost never barrel straight down; due to Earth's rotation, nearly all impacts are oblique strikes...
Come on man, if you want to go there, have some knowledge of this stuff...