No I'm just being crazy and saying take a character as their whole and don't lowball them by constantly bringing up low end feats. Which some people were thumbing motherf*ckers up for the "he got beat by Batman" thing.
I think my point was KK avoids his beam and punches his head off. But we couldn't agree on the speed of the attack and thus there is no point to continue. Neither of us could really concretely prove the speed of the attack either way, and it's obviously the only chance Batman has at winning so..you see the dilemma? For instance we both know KK even has other speed feats besides the whole speed force lightning thing, but why bother?
I mean dude you sort of responded like you find the Deathstroke showings legit? If I made Deathstroke vs Flash, would you be one of the people saying he wins? The reason I find the Deathstroke thing silly is because of how he is normally portrayed, and likewise KK is normally portrayed as far above Batman. I have to believe deep down you know this.