Is Palpatine a universe buster?

Started by Beniboybling19 pages
Beniboybling Worst Member

Originally posted by Nephthys
Apologies, allow me try to put it in ways you might understand:

YouTube video

Your usual brand of crap then. 🙂

The_Tempest Senior Member

I'm sticking with the Comic's Companion tbh. 👍

MS Warehouse Senior Member

That part is simple. Palpatine is just well above Vitiate, but that's not where the line is to be drawn.

I'm glad S66 is back with his usual "Sidious is the best, prove me wrong!" arguments.

Comparing Palpatine's Force Storm to either of Vitiate's planet wide destruction "rituals" is funny.

The_Tempest Senior Member

Well, he is right tbh.

MS Warehouse Senior Member
Originally posted by The_Tempest
Well, he is right tbh.

Yea not really.

The_Tempest Senior Member

But he is. Really.

MS Warehouse Senior Member

It's obviously very debatable, and if I used the same reasoning tactic, you wouldn't be able to "prove me wrong".

The_Tempest Senior Member

Nah. S66 is right on the money about Sheev's supremacy. The case is just too strong tbh.

MS Warehouse Senior Member

There is no "case". I wouldn't expect you to argue about this objectively so there's no point. We'll agree to disagree and I'll continue ridiculing s66's arguments. Would be a nice change of pace if they had some merit to them.

The_Tempest Senior Member

I don't think you're a credible authority on objectivity regarding this issue tbh.

MS Warehouse Senior Member

Originally posted by The_Tempest
I don't think you're a credible authority on objectivity regarding this issue tbh.

Neither are you and that's the point, hence we agree to disagree 👆

The_Tempest Senior Member

Wouldn't that same logic compel you to "agree to disagree" with S66?

Otherwise you're ridiculing him for opinions that, by your own admission, you're too biased to evaluate objectively.

That's kinda hypocritical, innit?

MS Warehouse Senior Member

Nope, because I don't think S66 is making valid arguments and instead employs the "prove me wrong" followed by "I'll keep typing until the opposition stops" tactics. So no, not hypocritical.

The_Tempest Senior Member

Yeah but by your own admission, you can't evaluate his arguments objectively.

MS Warehouse Senior Member
Originally posted by The_Tempest
Yeah but by your own admission, you can't evaluate his arguments objectively.

"Arguments" being the operative word. It's the same reason I don't respond to Legend's pro Vitiate/TOR arguments even if they fall in line with my outlook.

The Ellimist The Shadow

The burden of proof shifts when one assertion is backed by canon statements.

Syndicate Senior Member
Originally posted by SunRazer
After those Starkiller arguments, you don't get to say that. lol

The difference is that you were serious. xD

MS Warehouse Senior Member
Originally posted by The Ellimist
The burden of proof shifts when one assertion is backed by canon statements.

Only when the canon statements are properly interpreted and in the proper context.

The_Tempest Senior Member
Originally posted by MS Warehouse
"Arguments" being the operative word. It's the same reason I don't respond to Legend's pro Vitiate/TOR arguments even if they fall in line with my outlook.

The fact that you admit LeGenD's outlook aligns with yours should bring you naught but great shame.

Nephthys The Gr8est!!!!!!!!

Legends arguments are getting somewhat validated by Swtor expansions tbh.