Force storms vs. Ziost

Originally posted by The Ellimist
"FYI", this is a nonsensical argument. Just vaguely declaring that the Earth has taken abuse before doesn't demonstrate that an imperial star destroyer, a fictional technological construction capable of massively faster than light travel, couldn't affect it. You'd need to run calculations, or at least give a reasonable framework of a case, lmao.

BTW, you're once again grasping at straws and just dismissing sources you don't like - what's new? The firepower and power generation abilities of imperial warships are officially documented in various literature, some of which has been provided to you. Furthermore, we can calculate it from the films themselves by looking at events like acceleration feats and scaling from the Death Star. This isn't a real question. You should drop it.

Another, much larger comet struck Earth about 3.3 billion years ago. It literally produced 11 richter scale Earthquakes. One cannot easily comprehend the energy output of this event.

In-fact, humans have endured a 9.5 richter scale Earthquake not long ago. The most powerful in recorded history whose energy output was equivalent to 0.119E+08 atomic bombs.

Guess what? Earth is doing fine.

Earth is lot more resilient then you imagine it to be.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
One cannot easily comprehend the energy output of this event.

I can. That's around 500 gigatons, or only about twice the per-shot output of a medium turbolaser of an Acclamator transport. An imperial star destroyer is like ten times larger, and has several times as many heavy turbolasers, each of which surpasses that figure with every shot, and can fire about once every other second.

You don't know shit about what you're talking about, and yet you're still trying to lecture me on it! LMAO

Originally posted by The Ellimist
I can. That's around 500 gigatons, or only about twice the per-shot output of a medium turbolaser of an Acclamator transport. An imperial star destroyer is like ten times larger, and has several times as many heavy turbolasers, each of which surpasses that figure with every shot, and can fire about once every other second.

You don't know shit about what you're talking about, and yet you're still trying to lecture me on it! LMAO

499999999999 Tons = 500 Gigatons

100,000,000,000,000 Tons = 90718 Gigatons (Chicxulub event)

The event that I am referring to dwarfs the energy output of Chixculub event.

You said it was an 11 on the richter scale. That's around 500 gigatons.

Even the Chicxulub event is less than the per-second power output of an imperial star destroyer, lol.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
You said it was an 11 on the richter scale. That's around 500 gigatons.

I said that it produced 11 richter scale Earthquakes across the world. The sheer energy output of this event is difficult to comprehend (hell a lot more then that of Chicxulub event).

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Even the Chicxulub event is less than the per-second power output of an imperial star destroyer, lol.

The sheer energy output of Chicxulub event is 90718 gigatons.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
🙄

I said that it produced 11 richter scale Earthquakes across the world. The actual amount of energy released was much much greater.

Really? Bullshit.

Then why don't you actually tell us what the output was, instead of trying to argue via vague analogies and [bad] descriptive language?

Your physics knowledge is sh*t, you think heavier objects fall locally faster than lighter ones, you don't even understand what the numbers you're throwing around actually mean, what are you trying to prove here?

Even the K-T extinction event is nothing next to what a star destroyer's main guns can do.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD

Really? Bullshit.

The sheer energy output of Chicxulub event is 90718 gigatons.

And a Venator star destroyer's peak reactor is 3.4*10^24 joules. You obviously don't understand what you're coming up against. 👆

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Then why don't you actually tell us what the output was, instead of trying to argue via vague analogies and [bad] descriptive language?

Your physics knowledge is sh*t, you think heavier objects fall locally faster than lighter ones, you don't even understand what the numbers you're throwing around actually mean, what are you trying to prove here?

Even the K-T extinction event is nothing next to what a star destroyer's main guns can do.

1102311310 Tons = 1 Gigaton

499999999999 Tons = 500 Gigatons

100,000,000,000,000 Tons = 90718 Gigatons (Chicxulub event)

The event that I am referring to dwarfs the energy output of Chixculub event.

Damn Ell. Your mere posts cause salt.

😆

Originally posted by The Ellimist
And a Venator star destroyer's peak reactor is 3.4*10^24 joules. You obviously don't understand what you're coming up against. 👆

You shove your nonsense up your arse. ****ing braindead @sshole.

He's snapped. 😆

^^^

That troll deserves it. Posting nonsense and rubbish is his forte.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You ****ing piece of shit, recheck my posts. I have posted concrete figures already. Here again:

1102311310 Tons = 1 Gigaton

499999999999 Tons = 500 Gigatons

100,000,000,000,000 Tons = 90718 Gigatons (Chicxulub event)

The event that I am referring to dwarfs the energy output of Chixculub event.

...but you didn't post the output. You just listed another and assert that it "dwarfs" it. By how much?

Please try again.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
...but you didn't post the output. You just listed another and assert that it "dwarfs" it. By how much?

Please try again.

I will see what I can find.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
That doesn't translates into firepower, you idiot. Not even close.

Wrong. As has been explained to you before, it can divert almost all of its reactor output to its heavy guns. 👆

And even if that weren't true, you still have the observation that the medium turbolasers of an Acclamator output 200 gigatons per shot.

These facts have been provided to you plenty of times, and yet you consistently delete or ignore these from your replies. You're getting some Beefy in you.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You ****ing piece of shit, recheck my posts. I have posted concrete figures already. Here again:

1102311310 Tons = 1 Gigaton

499999999999 Tons = 500 Gigatons

100,000,000,000,000 Tons = 90718 Gigatons (Chicxulub event)

The event that I am referring to dwarfs the energy output of Chixculub event.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Yes, talk nicely and try to understand. Don't post meaningless garbage.

I will see what I can find.

So you just called me a piece of sh*t for asking for an actual figure, lie and claim that you already provided one...and now admit that you didn't all along? 😂

Originally posted by |King Joker|
LMFAO

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Wrong. As has been explained to you before, it can divert almost all of its reactor output to its heavy guns. 👆

And even if that weren't true, you still have the observation that the medium turbolasers of an Acclamator output 200 gigatons per shot.

These facts have been provided to you plenty of times, and yet you consistently delete or ignore these from your replies. You're getting some Beefy in you.

Aircraft carriers have nuclear reactors. Those reactors power its functions and weaponry. This is it.