Originally posted by Sharivan
Which makes it problematic to use him within a versus context. if he has so few feats outside of his showings over other charters.
cool, since i'm not the one who brought him up and touted it as a great feat. 👆
It's established in the very first scan there that it is Black Tarantula.http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/29398483/Power_Man_and_Iron_Fist_2016-_002-008.jpg.html
i didn't say it WASN'T him. i said it didn't SEEM like him given how weak he was and how off his speech pattern was. big difference and makes me think the writer didn't really know much of his prior history which would explain the ridiculousness of the fight.
No explain why you think that using evidence to justify Black Tarantula's showings over other characters.
wth? i already addressed this--he doesn't have many appearances but the ones he has, in particular vs spidey are enough to convince me this fight is ridiculous and should be thrown out.
Due to the fact that Batman has nothing outside his showings over other characters that justifies it in any way. Which was my reasoning. What's yours?
because he has repeatedly, over the course of years, done similar things to high level characters. that's my reasoning. i like my reasoning better. 👆
Okay then, why was it ridiculous? Also, don't say "it wasn't Black Tarantula."
already explained precisely--it is ridiculous because he LITERALLY no sold, completely tanked, full on shots from spiderman. IF didn't even need teh IF to ko him in a couple panels. ridiculous barely describes that fight.
Show me his feats outside of his showings over other characters that justifies him being faster than light, and splitting planets in half with his fists.
why on earth would i have to? the fights speak for themselves. i mean he's survived multiple gunshot wounds, stabbings, explosions a million times in his history. he's beat down parademons, amazons, grabbed impulse, smacked kid flash, taken the rings from hal and kyle before they know they are gone, smashed through steel doors, survives falls from 30 story buildings with his agility and cloak, explosions that would kill anyone, moves so fast people think he teleports, etc..... here, you gonna hand wave away ALL of these?
https://www.reddit.com/r/BatmanMegaRT/comments/3m2x04/combat_feats_1v1/
your definition of PIS is different from mine, hence we will never agree on this issue. which is fine by me. just don't make it seem like your opinion carries any more weight at all than mine does, or anyone else's who posts here.
Which I already answered, and the response that was given back to me was "well, Batman does some weird things so obviously no limit to his abilities and everything he does is justifiable."
because he's done it over and over and over again.
Which is a load of horseshit.
you say that like your OPINION is in someway conclusive. it is absolutely NOT. but you are welcome to it.
Particularly since this only applies to Batman, and no one else in this thread. Showing yet another double standard.
bullsh!t.
No, it isn't.
yes it is. see how easy this is.
His popularity allows him to do far better against characters he has no right to be fighting.
iyo. stop touting your opinion like fact how about?
Yes, because Spiderman isn't the one who taken down entire helicarriers in a single blow. Spiderman isn't the one who hit so hard he destroy interdimensional portals. Spiderman isn't the one who can destroy entire buildings with his punches.
not sure if serious...?
Okay, that's your subjective opinion.
👆
That's not the point which is flying over your head. In comic books fights almost never make sense. You can't pick and choose which ones are acceptable for no reason.
of course i can. wtf? and apparently the thing flying over YOUR head is that that is PRECISELY what YOU are doing, hand-waving away everything you don't like while somehow claiming your knowledge of feats 'outside' of fights justifies using or not using whatever you want. lol hypocritical much?
You need something outside of those fights that justifies it. [/B]
you keep saying that, but no, i really don't. at all--though in batman's history, he has more than enough feats to justify his fighting feats.
bottomline--this isn't a debate anymore. it's simply you THINKING none of batman's feats make sense and hand waving them away. goody for you. you're welcome to your opinion. just don't preach it like your opinion is fact and everyone should step in line. cuz it sure as sh!t isn't my opinion.
you're free to have the last word btw, but i'm done "debating" this with you. IMO the team still wins this and batman alone would be a great fight for danny.