Originally posted by quanchi112
What facts then ? Do you normally respond with little to no relevant information.
No, because I have a grasp of something called context - which is relevant information in of itself. Context is what decides whether or not information is relevant... and it seems like you lack an understanding of what context is.
No, the facts are Windu disarmed and had him beaten. You are biased. It's painfully obvious but you're so deluded you can't even see it anymore and you believe your ridiculous justifications.
Really?
The ending continues to be debated; Windu seemingly has Sidious beaten, unarmed and cowering. But was this all planned to get Anakin to come to his defense?-- http://www.starwars.com/news/the-starwars-com-10-best-fights
But was the fall into the corner that preceded his pleas for help a lie as well?
It's at least up for debate - even if you choose to deny the mountain of contextual information in the RotS novel and information pieced together from numerous sources, you have to at least admit that it's debatable. If not, you're clearly much more close-minded than the people you're accusing of being close-minded.
But then again, your logic would suggest that the facts are that blind Kanan stomped Maul in a couple of strikes, so I'm guessing that you're incredibly biased for denying it 👆