PoD Bane vs. AotC Anakin

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Holy shit, I was expecting a trove of people Ellimist. You were mentioned in the first post, and then by Joker and....That's it. And that's without any kind of analysis. So you got a nod from 2 people on a forum you dominate with text? And you're sitting here talking about a "majority"? Wow honestly I'm incredibly disappointed. This was much easier than I thought it was going to be. The amount of lying you've done to yourself is groundbreaking. I hope you've been joking the past 20 minutes because besides your angrly schoolgirl outbursts, you're looking less sane by the minute :Lol:

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Seriously, all you needed to do was go control + f to find more people than that on the first page alone. And notice that the mods aren't here to delete all your embarrassing blunders anymore; people are seeing you fail at basic counting.

Spoiler:
That your name does not come up once is, of course, something we don't have to mention, for the sake of your sanity.

We're not talking about name mentions. You were mentioned on another page as "nothing impressive". Try to keep up. And when you were mentioned in a positive light, so were guys like DMB. The only thing people are seeing is your emotional outbursts and rationalizing, while butchering the english language. It's amazing you continue ignoring my questions about objective standards and proving my point about a popularity contest (although if you were able to count, 4 does not constitute a majority) 👆

Also, why would my name come up? When that thread was made, I wasn't active member on the SW forum for more than a year or two. Try harder 😂

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Seriously, all you needed to do was go control + f to find more people than that on the first page alone. And notice that the mods aren't here to delete all your embarrassing blunders anymore; people are seeing you fail at basic counting.

Spoiler:
That your name does not come up once is, of course, something we don't have to mention, for the sake of your sanity.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
You were mentioned on another page as "nothing impressive".

Yeah, I count seven or so endorsements, and conveniently you fixate on one lukewarm counterexample. How objective of you.

Note: do you want to place a wager on whether that person would rate you or me as the better debater?

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
We're not talking about name mentions. You were mentioned on another page as "nothing impressive". Try to keep up. And when you were mentioned in a positive light, so were guys like DMB. The only thing people are seeing is your emotional outbursts and rationalizing, while butchering the english language. It's amazing you continue ignoring my questions about objective standards and proving my point about a popularity contest (although if you were able to count, 4 does not constitute a majority) 👆

Also, why would my name come up? When that thread was made, I wasn't active member on the SW forum for more than a year or two. Try harder 😂

Yeah, I count seven or so endorsements, and conveniently you fixate on one lukewarm counterexample. How objective of you.

Note: do you want to place a wager on whether that person would rate you or me as the better debater?

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Of course you counted 7. But you were counting name mentions which to you equates to endorsements. I showed you where it isn't. Furthermore, you seem to have trouble with the meaning of "majority", when you had 4-5 endorsements on 8 pages (I didn't go beyond).

And who is the judge. Quan? Lol. I would take you up on your challenge if you finally acknowledge your ongoing insecurity in proving your popularity but you've been so easy to deal with, I'll do you one better. We can have a debate involving just you and I, and then you can have someone judge. I'll be up for that.

Oh I'm sorry quan, I didn't realize I was the only one ignoring you the past 2 hours you've been typing. Here's your acknowledgement that you exist 👆

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Of course you counted 7. But you were counting name mentions which to you equates to endorsements. I showed you where it isn't.

No, I mean spelled out acknowledgments. Syndicate, DMB, Jkbart, Skillz, Tempest, Aubere, Joker - that's seven, and just the ones I got from a quick skim.

Beefy, meanwhile, has...

And who is the judge. Quan? Lol.

...no, the person we're asking.

I would take you up on your challenge if you finally acknowledge your ongoing insecurity in proving your popularity but you've been so easy to deal with, I'll do you one better.

Actually I didn't start this. Mythlord offhandedly mentioned that nobody takes you seriously, and you responded to that one sentence with like an entire paragraph. Then I gave you the perfect way out: name THREE debaters that take you seriously. You don't think it's odd that you haven't taken up that challenge?

We can have a debate involving just you and I, and then you can have someone judge. I'll be up for that.

I would be up for it too. We don't even need a judge given your skepticism of those; we can just have a public debate.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Oh I'm sorry quan, I didn't realize I was the only one ignoring you the past 2 hours you've been typing. Here's your acknowledgement that you exist 👆

No, I mean spelled out acknowledgments. Syndicate, DMB, Jkbart, Skillz, Tempest, Aubere, Joker - that's seven, and just the ones I got from a quick skim.

Beefy, meanwhile, has...

Actually I didn't start this. Mythlord offhandedly mentioned that nobody takes you seriously, and you responded to that one sentence with like an entire paragraph. Then I gave you the perfect way out: name THREE debaters that take you seriously. You don't think it's odd that you haven't taken up that challenge?

I would be up for it too. We don't even need a judge given your skepticism of those; we can just have a public debate.

Beefy, why are you still refusing to present any evidence for your case? Can you give me a straight answer, rather than acting like Donald Trump's campaign manager?

So beefy still can't name anyone from any forum he's debated with for the past how many years. Very telling.

I love how you ignored my challenge to present three debaters that like you for like the twentieth time in three pages. 😆

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
I'm sure you saw 7.

Do you want to wager that seven people said I was a good debater? Loser has to stay off KMC for a month.

Oh yea, a public debate. Because those have worked so well historically. We don't need a public debate. I'll more than happily engage just you. We can have judges if you want. If we want a modicum of objectivity, you take 1 diehard PT/OT guy and 1 diehard SWTOR guy. And this is swtor, not even social issues which I would be even more comfortable with, so that's saying a lot. I look forward to YOU setting the parameters.

We can even debate social issues if you want, but who are the judges?

I'd propose Tempest, Ant and Skillz.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Beefy, why are you still refusing to present any evidence for your case? Can you give me a straight answer, rather than acting like Donald Trump's campaign manager?

Trump's current campaign manager does give direct answers, but I figure you're behind on the times or heard the joke somewhere without understanding it. You want me to present my case in a forum where I'm virtually inactive. Feel free to post in the political forums and you'll get 3 people. I'm not interested in engaging in your popularity contest (you: that means nobody can vouch for you!!). I encourage you to post and get responses yourself, though.

We can even debate social issues if you want, but who are the judges?

I'd propose Tempest, Ant and Skillz.

Beefy even edits posts to avoid the questions.

😂

😂

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Trump's current campaign manager does give direct answers, but I figure you're behind on the times or heard the joke somewhere without understanding it. You want me to present my case in a forum where I'm virtually inactive. Feel free to post in the political forums and you'll get 3 people. I'm not interested in engaging in your popularity contest (you: that means nobody can vouch for you!!). I encourage you to post and get responses yourself, though.

No no, lets stick to star wars. I don't think you're ready for social issues. I'm making this considerably harder for myself because it's an area where I'm no longer invested in. I don't think the social issues debate would be much of a debate. Those sound like ok judges to me.

Quan, you realize you're a sideshow right?

Originally posted by MS Warehouse

No no, lets stick to star wars. I don't think you're ready for social issues.

How suspicious of you. You claim to be really good at something, but refuse to debate it. mmm

But OK, look at your PM.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
How suspicious of you. You claim to be really good at something, but refuse to debate it. mmm

But OK, look at your PM.

I would prefer to start with a harder topic for me and if that doesn't go my way, we can go forward with something I'm more passionate (or less ambivalent) about.

Why would I start with something easier instead of finishing with that? 👆

Also responded.