Your judgement on debating ability comes from who's opinion you agree more, not who's case is legitimately better, as with most debaters on the forums.
What an utterly retarded outlook to have, lal. Debating ability should be judged by who makes the better arguments, not the stance of said arguments. If not, you're just being bias to which one fits your arbitrary rankings. Rather than point articulation, ingenuity, overall intellect, etc.
The rest of your post is just aimless chest beating, and bias debating rankings so I'm just going to ignore.
Originally posted by AncientPowerYou know, she has a point. While all of you retards are doing homework to become qualified in your desired field, AP is taking the world by storm and making big money while doing it.
I'm so 'dumb', that I have a Mastery in the Arts of Business Administration from UP Diliman and earn the equivalent of US$84,700 a month for taking paid-in-contract business trips around Manila, Malaysia, Singapore and Hong Kong all year round.But I'm sure I'm a retard who gets to spend half her day on beaches whilst the bunch of you are doing homework. 😂
With her... Master's degree... from a university... which she presumably did a lot of homework to obtain.
And it's risen her self-esteem to such heights that she decided to boast about it to people young enough to be in school because one of them... called her dumb.
You go, AP. Killin' it. 😮💨
Originally posted by Deronn_solo
What an utterly retarded outlook to have, lal. Debating ability should be judged by who makes the better arguments, not the stance of said arguments. If not, you're just being bias to which one fits your arbitrary rankings. Rather than point articulation, ingenuity, overall intellect, etc.The rest of your post is just aimless chest beating, and bias debating rankings so I'm just going to ignore.
A few weeks ago your top 5 best debaters consisted of 4 PT debaters and only 1 from TOR 🙂
Originally posted by SunRazer
I'm curious as to what caused DC's recent shift in mindset, tbh.
Originally posted by Ursumeles
Well, we may have different definitions of arguments.
It is mainly how you represent your argument, and how good your rhetoric is.
An example for good rhetoric would be Ziggy, or Nai.
Nai is a quality debater, I just disagree on 99.99% of his stances, lmao.
Ziggy on other hand, is just a case of, as Shawn Carter would put it: "Just because you don't understand him that doesn't mean he nice, that just mean you don't understand all the bullshit that he writes".
Originally posted by Deronn_solo
What an utterly retarded outlook to have, lal. Debating ability should be judged by who makes the better arguments, not the stance of said arguments. If not, you're just being bias to which one fits your arbitrary rankings. Rather than point articulation, ingenuity, overall intellect, etc.
Which is how most users actually judge a debater's "skill", nowadays. You'll obviously root more for the debater who's ranking is closer to your own, than the reverse, unless an argumenti so well crafted it makes you change your opinion entirely.
However, arguments like that are rare, mostly due to most forum users already clinging tightly to a respective head-canon ranking.
Originally posted by Deronn_solo
The rest of your post is just aimless chest beating, and bias debating rankings so I'm just going to ignore.
And your original post wasn't?