Originally posted by Robtard
Blah. blah. blah. You hatred of women has been noted. /notedIOW: "If I didn't see it, it never happened."
Any more whine with that cheese? Or shall we get back to topic?
Your hypocrisy has been noted as well. /noted
It's fun to note things. Anything else or shall we get back to the topic? I mean it's not like gay marriage was the topic either, but shh.
Oh you didn't bring it up? Apologies, I just saw this and..
Originally posted by Robtard
Isn't it funny that the same people who want others to be accountable for the sex they're having, are also the ones who oppose sex (same-sex) that can't lead to a pregnancy.
I thought you meant gay marriage, but you just meant they oppose gay sex. Which of course the topic wasn't about gay sex either.
But it's okay, it's your topic and you can talk about gay sex all you want.
I don't get how your elected officials have this much time on their hands for this idiocy. This Bill has no middle ground so it'll obviously fail when put to court (At least I hope so) and most sane people should know that, and yet here it is. Just seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol I hate condoms. Any girl I've been with has been on birth control.But hey so what about changing the law so if you can prove you used BC and it failed you can get an abortion? Would you be down with that?
Condoms, birth control and all other contraceptives have a chance of failure. And based on my perusing, this bill does not make any exceptions, even for rape victims and so on.
Even if it did make exceptions for rape victims, there could be many issues that arise that would be unconstitutional imo: A rape victim chooses not to report the crime, finds out later she's impregnated but how is she suppose to prove it was rape and say not a one-night stand? And so on.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Sarcasm right?
No, I hate females. I punch my mom in the face every mothers day and she gets a second punch if she doesn't thank me for it.
But no seriously, yeah..if it was up to me I wouldn't pass this kind of bill.
But if this does pass they will indeed need to get more used to the idea of practicing safe sex. I know people might not want to hear that, but it's a reality if this passes. Obviously using protection won't shield you 100%, but I have legitimately known women who weren't too concerned about safe sex because abortions are legal here.
Originally posted by Surtur
No, I hate females. I punch my mom in the face every mothers day and she gets a second punch if she doesn't thank me for it.But no seriously, yeah..if it was up to me I wouldn't pass this kind of bill.
But if this does pass they will indeed need to get more used to the idea of practicing safe sex. I know people might not want to hear that, but it's a reality if this passes. Obviously using protection won't shield you 100%, but I have legitimately known women who weren't too concerned about safe sex because abortions are legal here.
Hey, I asked instead of assuming didn't I?
And by "they" I hope you mean men AND women who actively engage in sex, and just women. Because I think the consequences of unsafe sex are equally the fault of both parties.
Well yea, women shouldn't be using abortions as the number one option. Prevention is key. Abortions are a hugely invasive procedure that can potentially have serious side-effects. That's a lack of education more than anything imo.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Hey, I asked instead of assuming didn't I?And by "they" I hope you mean men AND women who actively engage in sex, and just women. Because I think the consequences of unsafe sex are equally the fault of both parties.
Well yea, women shouldn't be using abortions as the number one option. Prevention is key. Abortions are a hugely invasive procedure that can potentially have serious side-effects. That's a lack of education more than anything imo.
Well yes of course both people need to watch out and be safe if this passes. But this does have more consequences for women than men.
Especially if there isn't even a loophole for abortions due to health risks. Though I suppose if push came to shove they could just go to a different state.
Originally posted by Surtur
Well yes of course both people need to watch out and be safe if this passes. But this does have more consequences for women than men.Especially if there isn't even a loophole for abortions due to health risks. Though I suppose if push came to shove they could just go to a different state.
Yes, because poor women, who are less likely to have access to contraception, and more likely to need abortion services, have the means to just travel to another state.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Yes, because poor women, who are less likely to have access to contraception, and more likely to need abortion services, have the means to just travel to another state.
I said if push comes to shove and it's a health risk they could. I never said it'd be easy or something just anyone can do.
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, dude, your dislike and distrust of women is epic; it's an ongoing thing I've noticed with you. What happened, tell.
It reminds me of this:
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Yes, because poor women, who are less likely to have access to contraception, and more likely to need abortion services, have the means to just travel to another state.
Realize you're talking to a guy who openly admitted he never uses* protection and relies on the woman to do it.
*Not that I think he actually has sex and this is why he dislikes women, but the mindset is there regardless.
Originally posted by Robtard
Realize you're talking to a guy who openly admitted he never uses* protection and relies on the woman to do it.*Not that I think he actually has sex and this is why he dislikes women, but the mindset is there regardless.
People who have healthy relationships with women do not feel the need to limit the choices of women, and people who have healthy sex lives do not feel the need to penalize others for having sex.
Originally posted by Robtard
Realize you're talking to a guy who openly admitted he never uses* protection and relies on the woman to do it.
Yes. I've only had sex with people I've been in a serious relationships with. If I banged random chicks I suppose I would have used one.
That really doesn't make me misogynistic or anything.
*Not that I think he actually has sex and this is why he dislikes women, but the mindset is there regardless.
Right, and this is the same person trying sarcastically say I'm clever?
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
People who have healthy relationships with women do not feel the need to limit the choices of women
Lol, christ almighty. Who said anything about limiting the choices of women? I never said I'd support this bill. I never said I force women I'm with to get on birth control or anything of the sort.
and people who have healthy sex lives do not feel the need to penalize others for having sex.
But again I never said I want women penalized for having sex.