US Immigration/Refugee Issue

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!

That worked out so well for them. Empthase on WORKED and OUT! [/B]

Whaaaa?! ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES?!!?!?!

Originally posted by Surtur
Whaaaa?! ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES?!!?!?!

It would be funny if the guy hired illegals to paint and payed them under the table with extremely shitty wages.

They probably wouldn't have skipped work to go to a rally.

Trump should offer the fired painters a job with the ICE lol.

Trump should offer them positions on the catapult.

Evidently their job was not important to them...

Thank Goodness they can now all get welfare.

Once the wall is built it might need to be painted. Just saying..

and the media blames Trump for sparking a riot.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-colorado-immigration-idUSKBN161077

The Denver Sheriff's Department on Tuesday defended its release of an illegal immigrant after he posted bond on theft charges only to be arrested for murder weeks later, saying it had no authority to hold him.

Ever Valles, 19, a Mexican national, was released from the Denver jail in late December. Last week he was charged by state prosecutors, along with another defendant, in the murder and robbery of a man at a light rail station this month.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials said in a statement that after Valles was arrested, it placed a detainer with the Denver County jail to hold him until its agents could take him into federal custody.

“The detainer wasn’t honored and he was released by the jail ... without prior notification,” ICE said. “Valles is a known gang member whose gang history is documented in the Colorado gang database.”

Sanctuary cities release criminals (who obviously aren't going to show up for their court date) are free to commit tons more crime in a never ending cycle.

I hope trump clamps the fuk down on sanctuary cities, and any illegal who commits crime, is jailed, then immediately sent back home, no ifs ands or buts.

If someone claims "it rained here last night" and it didn't, they're not vindicated if it happens to rain later on.

This is just common sense that any person with even a slightly below average intelligence could understand.

Originally posted by Robtard
If someone claims "it rained here last night" and it didn't, they're not vindicated if it happens to rain later on.

This is just common sense that any person with even a slightly below average intelligence could understand.

If it did rain you would just blame it on Climate Change.

Which would then be blamed on Trump anyway so...HydeeHoo!

Originally posted by Surtur
Well remember the narrative is that if we had to pay them legal wages the costs of food would skyrocket. Data is rarely given with these claims.

If people find that logic legit, well making all these illegals suddenly legal should have the same effect on prices that getting rid of the illegals from the country would.

70% of agriculture and food processing jobs in the US are done by foreign workers around half of which are illegals.

Increases in labour costs typically result in 2 things. Reduction in jobs or increase in prices or a mix of both.

Originally posted by jaden101
70% of agriculture and food processing jobs in the US are done by foreign workers around half of which are illegals.

Increases in labour costs typically result in 2 things. Reduction in jobs or increase in prices or a mix of both.

Correct.

Of course, if you're a liberal then you're overlooking the exploitative factor (As many liberals tend to do on this issue.)

Originally posted by jaden101
70% of agriculture and food processing jobs in the US are done by foreign workers around half of which are illegals.

Increases in labour costs typically result in 2 things. Reduction in jobs or increase in prices or a mix of both.

Out of curiosity, why not raise the costs already? Would they really need to the excuse of "well damn, no more illegals for me, gotta hire a legal American and then increase prices" ?

Since it occurs to me if they are such pieces of crap they hire illegal labor and screw over legal Americans, why would they have any qualms about not jacking the prices up as much as they could get away with?

Originally posted by Surtur
Out of curiosity, why not raise the costs already? Would they really need to the excuse of "well damn, no more illegals for me, gotta hire a legal American and then increase prices" ?

Since it occurs to me if they are such pieces of crap they hire illegal labor and screw over legal Americans, why would they have any qualms about not jacking the prices up as much as they could get away with?

A single producer doing so would soon find themselves uncompetitive and unable to sell their goods to supermarkets, restaurants etc. All of them collaborating to do so would go against anti-trust laws that prohibit forming cartels to fix pricing.

Unlike how things work now were most corps are run by Leftist Agenda Driven Marxists who want to affix things with price control and create economic cartels hidden behind a mask of Benevolent Government.

Yeah Fly. That's right. Global conglomerates are all run by leftist marxists. Damn those Koch brothers and their communist ways.

Originally posted by jaden101
A single producer doing so would soon find themselves uncompetitive and unable to sell their goods to supermarkets, restaurants etc. All of them collaborating to do so would go against anti-trust laws that prohibit forming cartels to fix pricing.

So they can't collaborate to do so, but they can apparently legally do it by merely being forced to not use illegals?

Oh what a wacky system we have. You could almost say they can legally do it..once they begin following the law lol.