Darth Nihilis vs Darth Plagueis

1. I'm not talking about midi-chlorian manipulation. I'm talking about general power; Plagueis believed that he now wielded enough power to replicate any showing of the Force from prior Sith. And no, his own opinion in of itself is not fact, but it's validated by the blurb.

2. The publisher is not a character, lmfao.

3. OOU comments are what takes precedence. In-universe comments are the ones that can be challenged because they're usually fallible. And no, it's been outright stated that the blurbs are CANON. There's no debate.

Christ LeG, every day a new excuse. 😂

FYI: Through gaining ultimate power over life and death Plagueis became the most powerful Sith Lord. Correct. 👆

Originally posted by SunRazer
1. I'm not talking about midi-chlorian manipulation. I'm talking about general power; Plagueis believed that he now wielded enough power to replicate any showing of the Force from prior Sith. And no, his own opinion in of itself is not fact, but it's validated by the blurb.

Originally posted by SunRazer
2. The publisher is not a character, lmfao.

Originally posted by SunRazer
3. OOU comments are what takes precedence. In-universe comments are the ones that can be challenged because they're usually fallible. And no, it's been outright stated that the blurbs are CANON. There's no debate.

We have two kind of realities:-

In-universe - AUTHENTIC for the world of fiction

Out-of-universe - AUTHENTIC for (our) world

Don't spread misconceptions about the authenticity of in-universe writing formats here. Check my latest response to member Azronger here: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=640514&pagenumber=10#post16138516

A blurb represents an OOU perspective of developments in the world of fiction (from the relevant publisher) and is utterly subjective unless endorsed within the in-universe body of literature of the relevant lore. This is my point.

If it was stated [in] the novel that Darth Plagueis had become more powerful than any Sith (living or entity) that existed before, it would have been an authentic revelation for the lore in question. But this is not the case and we are left with a subjective assessment of a publisher for it.

LeG can I get the source on OOU material being subjective/non-canon? Or are you perhaps making this up. mmm

Furthermore, can you confirm that by this logic, RPG campaign guides, visual dictionaries, the Fact Files and all other sourcebooks without the historian conceit are also subjective?

Nihilus obviously.

Plagueis stomps

Originally posted by Beniboybling
LeG can I get the source on OOU material being subjective/non-canon? Or are you perhaps making this up. mmm

Furthermore, can you confirm that by this logic, RPG campaign guides, visual dictionaries, the Fact Files and all other sourcebooks without the historian conceit are also subjective?

That's a link to a fan-run wiki, I'm looking for a legitimate source thanks. Not that it supports any of your claims regardless.

I have a feeling member S__W___LeGenDz editted that wiki; for more information with good explanation, plz look at this: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33462184

Page has been updated with new ground realities, I suggest checking it out:

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/In-universe

EDIT: Page was reedited by some troll, luckily I took a screenshot:

mmm

i also have an screenshot:

That is really cheap.

Interesting revelation, Myth. I wonder if this should be considered an in-universe or out-of-universe source?

You both are strong with the TROLL.

It's not nice to call other people trolls.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You both are strong with the TROLL.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Interesting revelation, Myth. I wonder if this should be considered an in-universe or out-of-universe source?

Does member S_W_Legend's butthole count as a universe? Cause in that case, in-universe. 🙂 🙂 🙂

🤣 🤣 🤣

Beni, waiting for your second ban 🙂🙂🙂

Not in this lawless country kek. 🙂