Superboy Prime replaces Doomsday in DOS

Originally posted by JBL
Jesus Christ dude!!! Stop crying. There are plenty of writers that have stated that superman does not have dynamic strength, but strength set in stone. Writers that say that superman, CM, BA are in the same class for years. Even having them debating among themselves who is stronger by having them stalemate in arm wrestling and having Superman HIMSELF stating that he and marvel are too close to call. He went all out against DD and still got killed. Had him fuse with CM and it was superman who was surprised, Marvel sensed nothing because two equals in strength gains NOTHING in strength and Marvel had the wisdom of Solomon. You have a DC and marvel flat out stating that Hulks dynamic strength would pass supermans strength showing that it's set in stone. There is not one writer foolish enough to say in ANY comic or interview that superman is only equal to BA or CM until he drops his mental blocks. If he could drop mental blocks and do like you blind fans pray for, there would be no debates, no challengers that are equal or slightly stronger because of your dream dynamic strength. Your crying was amusing for a time, but you really believe yourself. How sad.

Let's see proof of writer's actually stating it. You said "plenty of writers." Considering how many have written Superman, I think it's fair to require you to back your claim with 10 writers who have said Superman's strength is set in stone. Get on it.

Originally posted by Delta1938
Let's see proof of writer's actually stating it. You said "plenty of writers." Considering how many have written Superman, I think it's fair to require you to back your claim with 10 writers who have said Superman's strength is set in stone. Get on it.

Originally posted by JBL
Jesus Christ dude!!! Stop crying. There are plenty of writers that have stated that superman does not have dynamic strength, but strength set in stone. Writers that say that superman, CM, BA are in the same class for years. Even having them debating among themselves who is stronger by having them stalemate in arm wrestling and having Superman HIMSELF stating that he and marvel are too close to call. He went all out against DD and still got killed. Had him fuse with CM and it was superman who was surprised, Marvel sensed nothing because two equals in strength gains NOTHING in strength and Marvel had the wisdom of Solomon. You have a DC and marvel flat out stating that Hulks dynamic strength would pass supermans strength showing that it's set in stone. There is not one writer foolish enough to say in ANY comic or interview that superman is only equal to BA or CM until he drops his mental blocks. If he could drop mental blocks and do like you blind fans pray for, there would be no debates, no challengers that are equal or slightly stronger because of your dream dynamic strength. Your crying was amusing for a time, but you really believe yourself. How sad.

You are just having another meltdown

What did Byrne said? 😂😂😂😂😂

Originally posted by JBL
If you would stop to think you would already know. Now listen. If supermans strength was increased and decreased throughout his career by writers over 50 years, what does that tell you???

Hahahahahaha lets see JBL where is your writers proof that Superman's strength is set in stone? 😂😂😂

I mean at least we back up our cases with canon material and writers interviews, you are just blah, blah, blah! blabla

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
You are just having another meltdown

What did Byrne said? 😂😂😂😂😂

Originally posted by JBL
Fail. Give up. History proves superman does not have dynamic strength. Ask CM, you know, the one that stalemate your boy in a direct strength test. Now go play with the rest of the kids😂😂😂😂😂

Um where is your proof? Just blah, blah, blah!

Oh and your little tamtrums

😂😂😂

What did Byrne said?

Originally posted by JBL
If you would stop to think you would already know. Now listen. If supermans strength was increased and decreased throughout his career by writers over 50 years, what does that tell you???

So you made claims and can't back it up? Concessions accepted.

Originally posted by Delta1938
So you made claims and can't back it up? Concessions accepted.

Originally posted by JBL
Wow! Even Stan Lee has said supernans strength is set in stone.

Not sure if trolling, or desperation. Or both.

Originally posted by Delta1938
Not sure if trolling, or desperation. Or both.

Stan Lee has never written Superman. His word regarding Superman is more worthless than yours.

Originally posted by JBL
Stan Lee was asked who he thought would win between hulk and superman. He answered by saying that he established the hulk to get stronger the more he fought with anger. He said that superman had a certain amount of strength and that was it. Not my words. You take one writer words but dismiss another because you don't like what he said. This is getting boring. Abhil is far more skilled at this than you. Come at me Abhil.

Even if we pretended Stan Lee had a say over Superman, when he's never even written the actual Superman, you would have to actually provide a link. And then links to 10 writers who have actually written Superman. Since you're the one who said "plenty of writers have said Superman's strength is set in stone." You are using red herrings and strawmen because you know you cannot back what you claim.

Just like you ignored me answering your question because I pointed-out after about 10 minutes, you claimed I "ran away in shame" for not answering it, and you never answered my question. You know that you have no actual argument to back Superman wasn't made weaker by the split. I specifically showed the Pre-FLASHPOINT Superman stating more than once he was weaker than before, and didn't know why.

Or how you claimed there's "only two examples of him getting stronger" when well, this is a strawman and there's more examples anyways, that you ignore.

And many other issues, in this topic alone.

In conclusion, you are both a liar and a hypocrite. If you're not trolling for the lulz, well, it's pretty obvious so I'll leave it at that.

Originally posted by Delta1938
Even if we pretended Stan Lee had a say over Superman, when he's never even written the actual Superman, you would have to actually provide a link. And then links to 10 writers who have actually written Superman. Since you're the one who said "plenty of writers have said Superman's strength is set in stone." You are using red herrings and strawmen because you know you cannot back what you claim.

Just like you ignored me answering your question because I pointed-out after about 10 minutes, you claimed I "ran away in shame" for not answering it, and you never answered my question. You know that you have no actual argument to back Superman wasn't made weaker by the split. I specifically showed the Pre-FLASHPOINT Superman stating more than once he was weaker than before, and didn't know why.

Or how you claimed there's "only two examples of him getting stronger" when well, this is a strawman and there's more examples anyways, that you ignore.

And many other issues, in this topic alone.

In conclusion, you are both a liar and a hypocrite. If you're not trolling for the lulz, well, it's pretty obvious so I'll leave it at that.

Originally posted by JBL
You are nothing more than a crazed superman fan that cherry pick scans. You have proved nothing. But I will give you one last chance. Show me anyone on this earth that had said that superman, CM and BA are close in strength UNTIL superman drops mental blocks. Other crazed superman fans don't count. In other words, no one from kmc. Go!

I have proven his strength increases, by posting scans of it happening. You're moving the goal post.

Why are you making red herring and strawman demands when failing to back unsubstantiated claims you've made? It seems you're demanding that I provide proof of something a writer said, to satisfy YOUR goal post moving demands, when you've made a specific claim that "plenty of writers" have said Superman's strength is "set in stone," claimed Stan Lee did(when he never wrote Superman so irrelevant regardless) and have not backed either claim. It doesn't really matter if Stan Lee actually did say it, but I told you to prove it just to prove you're lying. Much like your hypocrisy here.

It comes down to, "I don't have to back what I say but you must give into my demands." Quite authoritative of you.

Originally posted by Delta1938
I have proven his strength increases, by posting scans of it happening. You're moving the goal post.

Why are you making red herring and strawman demands when failing to back unsubstantiated claims you've made? It seems you're demanding that I provide proof of something a writer said, to satisfy YOUR goal post moving demands, when you've made a specific claim that "plenty of writers" have said Superman's strength is "set in stone," claimed Stan Lee did(when he never wrote Superman so irrelevant regardless) and have not backed either claim. It doesn't really matter if Stan Lee actually did say it, but I told you to prove it just to prove you're lying. Much like your hypocrisy here.

It comes down to, "I don't have to back what I say but you must give into my demands." Quite authoritative of you.

"Stan Lee knew about Superman" lol this guy is serious though

Hahahahaha JBL is bringing Stan Lee as his evidence?

😂😂😂😂 he must really be desperate hahahahahahahaha

I repeat what Stan Lee said. Mr Lee knew about superman just like DC writers know about hulk and other marvel characters. Writers from different companies do do research on other characters. That's how you get crossovers and what ifs. Jesus Christ!! Get smart people.

This is quite weird.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Hahahahaha JBL is bringing Stan Lee as his evidence?

😂😂😂😂 he must really be desperate hahahahahahahaha