Wonder Woman vs. Superman

Originally posted by Sable
Exactly, why do you keep bringing up bullet blocking feats in a fight with no gun.

Because it shows Wonder Woman being fast enough to block multiple bullets. Keep up man.

According to you, bullet blocking matters in a fight with no guns.

Originally posted by Sable
So does WW have a gun?

I've not seen WW yet, will likely have time this weekend, but I'm pretty sure WW uses a sword.

He is bringing it up to showcase WW's reaction speed, the same reason you brought up the 40mm grenade for Superman. unless of course you were trying to claim that Superman has a 40mm grenade launcher in this fight.

So, were you claiming that Superman has a 40mm grenade launcher?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Because it shows Wonder Woman being fast enough to block multiple bullets. Keep up man.

And that means what to do with Superman, that he can't hit her?? Cause she blocked bullets, ridiculous.

Originally posted by Sable
According to you, bullet blocking matters in a fight with no guns.

There are only 2 things this statement proves:

1. You're too slow to keep up with the analogies in this debate.
2. You're specifically trolling to derail the line of debate.

Which is it?

Originally posted by Silent Master
He is bringing it up to showcase WW's reaction speed, the same reason you brought up the 40mm grenade for Superman. unless of course you were trying to claim that Superman has a 40mm grenade launcher in this fight.

So, were you claiming that Superman has a 40mm grenade launcher?

Originally posted by FrothByte
There are only 2 things this statement proves:

1. You're too slow to keep up with the analogies in this debate.
2. You're specifically trolling to derail the line of debate.

Which is it?

Originally posted by FrothByte
There are only 2 things this statement proves:

1. You're too slow to keep up with the analogies in this debate.
2. You're specifically trolling to derail the line of debate.

Which is it?

It's #2, he's a sock. just not sure of who.

Originally posted by Sable
And that means what to do with Superman, that he can't hit her?? Cause she blocked bullets, ridiculous.

Well so far we haven't seen Superman launch multiple attacks as fast as bullets...

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's #2, he's a sock. just not sure of who.

I think because it was proven that the grenade launcher had far slower muzzle velocities than handguns, so now he's changing tactics.

Originally posted by Sable
I said a similar feat, it's besdie the point, bullet blocking has nothing to do with this fight. She fought plenty of people with no bullet blocking feats that were slower then Superman and still landed plenty of hits on her, case closed.

The 40mm grenade is a similar feat in the sense that lifting a car is similar to lifting a tank.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Well so far we haven't seen Superman launch multiple attacks as fast as bullets...

And we never saw Ares or his henchman do that either.

Originally posted by Sable
Because people keep saying bullet blocking feats matter in a fight. But they didn't matter with Ares or his henchman.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The 40mm grenade is a similar feat in the sense that lifting a car is similar to lifting a tank.

Bullet blocking has nothing to do with this fight. She fought plenty of people with no bullet blocking feats that were slower then Superman and still landed plenty of hits on her, are you getting this?

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
I was afraid you would say that. Lol

Whys that? They don't have bullet blocking feats, and are slower then Superman and they still landed plenty of hits.

His overall point is WW is both faster(reactions) and more skilled than Superman, thus she is more likely to both dodge and land attacks.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I think because it was proven that the grenade launcher had far slower muzzle velocities than handguns, so now he's changing tactics.

I am fine with the muzzle velocity being slower, it doesn't change that it's still extremely fast. But as I have said many times, I said it was a comparable feat, I never said it was equal. I suggest you read what I wrote.

Originally posted by Sable
Bullet blocking has nothing to do with this fight. She fought plenty of people with no bullet blocking feats that were slower then Superman and still landed plenty of hits on her, are you getting this?

Reaction speed has nothing to do with this fight?

Originally posted by Silent Master
His overall point is WW is both faster(reactions) and more skilled than Superman, thus she is more likely to both dodge and land attacks.

Ares and his henchman have no feats of blocking bullets or catching bullets and are much slower then Superman but they landed plenty of hits on her.

Originally posted by Sable
Ares and his henchman have no feats of blocking bullets and are much slower then Superman but they landed plenty of hits on her.

So your argument is that WW isn't going to use her superior reactions?