Can ANYONE Go To Heaven?

Originally posted by Surtur
Wait, so Satan is the god of this age?

But, this age has been pretty good. Yes, lots of bad shit has happened, but lots of good shit too in terms of the progress of humanity. Just how far we've come in the last century is amazing.

Thanks Satan!

Also when you say God "drew" you to his son Jesus that not only sounds creepy, but it sounds like God straight up mind raped you into loving his kid.

Yes, satan is the god of this age; the prince (or ruler) of this world.

That's why the world is so sinful, rebellious to God, evil, wicked, corrupt, unfair, unequal, and unjust.

That’s why there’s murder, terrorism, poverty, sickness, nuclear weapons, famine, recession, inflation, accidents, disease, natural disasters, pornography, drug addiction, alcoholism, theft, prostitution, mental illness, flooding or floods, natural disasters, bestiality, homosexuality, lesbianism gay lifestyle, bisexuality, transgenderism, embezzlement, depression, child molestations, abortion centers, war, sex trafficking, illegal drugs, guns, rape, masturbation, sodomy, gangs, genocide, racism, horoscopes, tarot cards, seances, Ouija boards, Angel boards, spirit guides, psychics, sorcery, demons, necromancy (i.e. talking to the dead like Luke Skywalker does with dead Obi-Wan), augury (i.e. interpreting omens), witchcraft, soothsaying (i.e. fortune telling), conjuring, spells, voodoo, hoodoo, santeria, devil worship/satanism, divination, the practice of mediums (i.e. calling up the dead—which are really demons disguised as, and impersonating loved ones, spiritism (or spiritualism), animism, the occult, wicca, false religions (i.e. Islam, Mormonism, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists, Catholicism, Buddhism, Hinduism, all salvation-based on/works-based religions, etc.), stargazing (i.e. astrology), prognostication, death, sorrow, and pain.

Have you ever heard the phrase, "Hell on Earth."?

Did you ever wonder where that phrase came from?

The suffering and torment that people experience in this life as a result of sin, death, the curse, and the devil—PALES IN COMPARISON to the suffering and torment that awaits them in Hell (IF THEY DIE IN THEIR SINS WITHOUT CHRIST).

As far as the Father (God) drawing me to His Son, you do err, not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God. In addition, you do not know how God operates. You see, God is Love, so EVERYTHING that He does is a MANIFESTATION of Who He is (which is Love).

So LOVE drew me to His Son.

It has NOTHING to do with the mind.

You see, God is a SPIRIT, and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth. But let me digress for a moment. The love that you have for someone (be it a parent, sibling, relative, friend, significant other, pet, etc.), was it what DREW you to him or her? Was it what DREW him or her to you? Was there any “mind rape” involved in that love?

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Thor's goats, Tanngrisnir and Tanngnjóstr, rise from the dead after he has cooked and eaten them, [b]the next day.

Tanngrisnir and Tanngnjóstr >>>>>> Jesus Christ by virtue of faster, more efficient resurrection.

[/B]

It is MORE AMAZING, requires MORE POWER, an is a GREATER MIRACLE, to rise from the dead after THREE DAYS and THREE NIGHTS, than to do so the next day. Plus, the Lord Jesus’ resurrection is REAL—NOT mythological, NOR fictional like Thor and his goats.

Funny how the Bible isn't part of the curriculum of study for doctors, surgeons, architects, engineers, etc.

Imagine that...

❌

Damn Christians.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
It is MORE AMAZING, requires MORE POWER, an is a GREATER MIRACLE, to rise from the dead after THREE DAYS and THREE NIGHTS, than to do so the next day. Plus, the Lord Jesus’ resurrection is REAL—NOT mythological, NOR fictional like Thor and his goats.

1. The goats resurrect continually, after their bodies are consumed. Jesus laid dead in a cave for three days. The former is far more impressive.

2. I have as much proof for the resurrection of the goats as I have for the resurrection of Jesus. An old collection of myths verifies each.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
1. The goats resurrect continually, after their bodies are consumed. Jesus laid dead in a cave for three days. The former is far more impressive.

2. I have as much proof for the resurrection of the goats as I have for the resurrection of Jesus. An old collection of myths verifies each.

Care to provide facts to support your claim?

Have you read my first post in Resurrection of the Lord Jesus: Fact or Fiction?, clicked on the YouTube links provided there, and read my last post to Adam_PoE there as well?

I provide reasonable proofs (i.e. evidences) to support my claims that the Lord Jesus rose from the dead, and that the Bible is indeed the Word of God.

No one reads your walls of nonsense.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Care to provide facts to support your claim?

Your argument: Jesus resurrected, because the Bible says so.

My argument: The goats resurrected, because Snorri Sturluson's works say so.

I think we're on equal footing here. My point stands that given we're using biased sources here to defend unrealistic assertions, mine wins by virtue of being more impressive compared to yours.

Eaten goats resurrect daily >>>> Jesus dies from cross death and revives once, three days later.

Have you read my first post in [b]Resurrection of the Lord Jesus: Fact or Fiction?, clicked on the YouTube links provided there, and read my last post to Adam_PoE there as well? [/b]

1. Your walls of text are generally ignored. If you can't structure your argument to actually be readable by others, it doesn't deserve the effort to read.

2. Youtube links aren't proof any more than napkins are canvas.

3. The whole idea of the Bible being a 'source' begs for proof.

[b]I provide reasonable proofs (i.e. evidences) to support my claims that the Lord Jesus rose from the dead, and that the Bible is indeed the Word of God. [/B]

No, you don't. The Bible itself is a human construct, made up of handpicked writings and gospels over a hundred years after Christ apparently lived, and none of its authors or editors ever met him in life. Additionally, the book was never written in English, so when you rehearse it back to us in English and put special emphasis on the words, you just demonstrate that you don't understand how translation works.

The bottom line is you think the Bible is the end-all without being able to substantiate that it is indeed, the end-all. You just take it for granted, and any challenges to this beg for proof somehow.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Your argument: Jesus resurrected, because the Bible says so.

My argument: The goats resurrected, because Snorri Sturluson's works say so.

I think we're on equal footing here. My point stands that given we're using biased sources here to defend unrealistic assertions, mine wins by virtue of being more impressive compared to yours.

That is a false equivalency, because the author of your work is known, while the author of his book remains anonymous, so your source is actually more reliable.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
That is a false equivalency, because the author of your work is known, while the author of his book remains anonymous, so your source is actually more reliable.

That's a good point.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Your argument: Jesus resurrected, because the Bible says so.

My argument: The goats resurrected, because Snorri Sturluson's works say so.

I think we're on equal footing here. My point stands that given we're using biased sources here to defend unrealistic assertions, mine wins by virtue of being more impressive compared to yours.

Eaten goats resurrect daily >>>> Jesus dies from cross death and revives once, three days later.

1. Your walls of text are generally ignored. If you can't structure your argument to actually be readable by others, it doesn't deserve the effort to read.

2. Youtube links aren't proof any more than napkins are canvas.

3. The whole idea of the Bible being a 'source' begs for proof.

No, you don't. The Bible itself is a human construct, made up of handpicked writings and gospels over a hundred years after Christ apparently lived, and none of its authors or editors ever met him in life. Additionally, the book was never written in English, so when you rehearse it back to us in English and put special emphasis on the words, you just demonstrate that you don't understand how translation works.

The bottom line is you think the Bible is the end-all without being able to substantiate that it is indeed, the end-all. You just take it for granted, and any challenges to this beg for proof somehow.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Your argument: Jesus resurrected, because the Bible says so.

My argument: The goats resurrected, because Snorri Sturluson's works say so.

I think we're on equal footing here. My point stands that given we're using biased sources here to defend unrealistic assertions, mine wins by virtue of being more impressive compared to yours.

Eaten goats resurrect daily >>>> Jesus dies from cross death and revives once, three days later.

1. Your walls of text are generally ignored. If you can't structure your argument to actually be readable by others, it doesn't deserve the effort to read.

2. Youtube links aren't proof any more than napkins are canvas.

3. The whole idea of the Bible being a 'source' begs for proof.

No, you don't. The Bible itself is a human construct, made up of handpicked writings and gospels over a hundred years after Christ apparently lived, and none of its authors or editors ever met him in life. Additionally, the book was never written in English, so when you rehearse it back to us in English and put special emphasis on the words, you just demonstrate that you don't understand how translation works.

The bottom line is you think the Bible is the end-all without being able to substantiate that it is indeed, the end-all. You just take it for granted, and any challenges to this beg for proof somehow.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Your argument: Jesus resurrected, because the Bible says so.

My argument: The goats resurrected, because Snorri Sturluson's works say so.

I think we're on equal footing here. My point stands that given we're using biased sources here to defend unrealistic assertions, mine wins by virtue of being more impressive compared to yours.

Eaten goats resurrect daily >>>> Jesus dies from cross death and revives once, three days later.

Part 1/2

Wrong. That’s “not” my claim, nor has it ever been.

You misrepresent my stance in this discussion.

You see, I’ve given you “extra-biblical” evidence, and “scientific” revelations in the Bible that were revealed “thousands” and “hundreds” of years before modern scientists discovered them (101 to be exact)—but you “run” in the other direction so to speak, every time I bring these “irrefutable”, “claim-proving facts” up.

My extra-biblical facts, scientific foreknowledge facts, and prophetic facts—prove that the Bible is not a work of mythology, nor fiction—as your claims about Thor’s goats “are” (don’t believe me, just examine my facts).

You see, your source for Thor’s goats does not have the “track record” that the Bible has. The Bible has “archaeological” weight, “extra-biblical” credence, scientific “foreknowledge”, and predictive (i.e. prophetic) power.

Thor and his goats?

Need I say more?

No, were “not” on equal footing based on the facts concerning the Bible’s divine origin (that I have repeatedly exhorted you to examine).

Again, “examine” my evidence. If you don’t want to know the Truth, then just keep on keeping on. But you will “never” be able to say that “no one” told you.

Unlike your Thor’s goats claims, the Bible has “consistently” proven itself to be the Word of God, archaeologically, extra-biblically, scientifically, and prophetically.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Have you read my first post in Resurrection of the Lord Jesus: Fact or Fiction?, clicked on the YouTube links provided there, and read my last post to Adam_PoE there as well?

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
1. Your walls of text are generally ignored. If you can't structure your argument to actually be readable by others, it doesn't deserve the effort to read.

2. Youtube links aren't proof any more than napkins are canvas.

3. The whole idea of the Bible being a 'source' begs for proof.

1. My last post to Adam_PoE was not a wall of text. Go back and look for yourself.

(continued in next post)

Part 2/3

2. YouTube links aren’t proof? Then someone should break the news to Patience_Leech.

I quote,

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Let's pretend this is still a debate, lol... because unfortunately far too many people still don't look honestly at the evidence. I think our species is doomed unless we realize our true origins and start making sense of the universe and our place in it. If we don't we're going to continue to kill each other (at worst) and delude ourselves (at best) over which book was written by God.

Creationism has a lot of things to answer for to be a viable scientific theory. Just to name a few...

1. [b]Vestigial Structures like the appendix in humans and hip bones in whales and dolphins (not very "intelligently designed"😉 (see video 1 below)

2. Starlight (I even had a Bible teacher in high school mention this as a baffling piece of evidence for Christians)

3. Fossil Record (less complex organisms deeper in the record, more complex more recent in the fossil record - no humans with dinosaurs, no rabbits in the Precambrian era, etc)

4. Chromosome 2 (evidence of a fusion, pretty conclusive for our relation to apes) (See video 3 below)

5. Dover, Pennsylvania area School district. Creationism did not hold up in court. (See video: Judgement Day: Intelligent Design On Trial (NOVA)

A couple really good introductory videos (the first is pretty short)...

YouTube video

YouTube video

YouTube video

Oh, and here are a few really good videos debunking Creationists, showing how dishonest and/or willfully ignorant they are about the evidence. It's deceptive and wrong...

Debunking Creationists - Dr. Ben Carson
Debunking Creationists - Dr. Jason Lisle
Debunking Creationists - Alan Horvath
Debunking Creationists - Jerry Bergman

That should be enough to keep anyone interested busy for a while... heh.. [/B]

3. I “keep” giving you “proof” but you won’t examine it (i.e. links to “scientific” facts revealed in the Bible thousands and hundreds of years before modern scientists discovered them, and prophecies which predict historical events with “better-than-laser-precision”, and “accuracy”).

It’s not my fault that you appear to be “afraid” of finding out the truth.

Also, I didn’t know that “eyewitness” testimony was not acceptable.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
I provide reasonable proofs (i.e. evidences) to support my claims that the Lord Jesus rose from the dead, and that the Bible is indeed the Word of God.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
No, you don't. The Bible itself is a human construct, made up of handpicked writings and gospels over a hundred years after Christ apparently lived, and none of its authors or editors ever met him in life. Additionally, the book was never written in English, so when you rehearse it back to us in English and put special emphasis on the words, you just demonstrate that you don't understand how translation work

The bottom line is you think the Bible is the end-all without being able to substantiate that it is indeed, the end-all. You just take it for granted, and any challenges to this beg for proof somehow.

1. Wrong. The Bible is “not” a human construct.

If you examined the information in my links you would “know” this by now—but it appears that you are “afraid” to do this.

Furthermore, archaeological, extra-biblical, scientific foreknowledge, and numerous fulfilled prophecies “prove” beyond a reasonable doubt—that the Bible is “theopneustos” (i.e. “God-breathed”).

2. Wrong. “God” divinely, and providentially compiled “His” Word into what we call the Bible.

The link below provides insight into His process.

Click and scroll down https://www.blueletterbible.org/faq/canon.cfm

Also, here’s the approximate “dates” that the various Books of the Bible were written.

“Not” one gospel was, as you erroneously claim, was written,

“…over a hundred years after Christ apparently lived….”

Click and scroll down to New Testament since you mentioned “gospels”, or scroll down to Old Testament (depending on which Books you want the approximate date for) https://www.biblegateway.com/blog/2016/02/when-was-each-book-of-the-bible-written/

(continued in next post)

Part 3/3

3. Wrong. Peter, James, John, Matthew, and possibly Jude were five of the original twelve apostles of the Lamb (i.e. Jesus Christ), “and” His disciples.

All “five” were given divine inspiration to pen Scripture—and “personally” knew Jesus in life.

Also, the apostle Paul (who wrote 14 of the 27 Books of the New Testament) saw Jesus on more than one occasion through visions, and a trip to Heaven.

4. Wrong. Whether I bold, highlight, italicize, or underlined—what you fail to admit is that I have “not” altered, nor changed the “meaning” of any translated word in the Bible in any way.

I know it’s difficult for you to come to terms with the Words of the Lord Jesus regarding a “majority” of people going to Hell, but it’s the “truth”.

But it does not have to be you, (nor anyone reading these words right) because Christ died for “your sins” according to the Scriptures. He was buried, and raised—the third day. In fact, Christ died for the sins of the whole world.

5. I don’t “think” that the Bible is the end-all.

I “know” that the Bible is the Word of the living God.

There’s a difference.

You mean you are “unwilling” to “read” and “click on” my substantiation.

Yep, if you all continue in the Word of the Lord Jesus Christ, then are you all His disciples “indeed”; And you all shall know the “Truth”, and the “Truth” shall make you free.

But I don’t take this truth for granted.

There hasn’t been a challenge concerning the Bible that I have not been able to overcome with respect to “proof”.

In case you haven't read this, here's my post to Adam_PoE:

Not so. Like I’ve told you on more than one occasion, God's Book (the Bible) has revealed scientific facts “thousands and hundreds” of years before modern scientists discovered and confirmed them (just click on the link and scroll down the list for proof).

Click (and scroll down to see the list) http://www.eternal-productions.org/101science.html

There is "no" scientific explanation for "how" the Bible could have known (and revealed) these things unless the Author of the Bible is God.

Let these sayings sink down into your ears.

Secondly, God’s Book (the Bible) predicts (prophesies) events “thousands and hundreds” of years before they occur which corroborates it’s divine origin.

Click http://www.reasons.org/articles/articles/fulfilled-prophecy-evidence-for-the-reliability-of-the-bible

Also, the Lord Jesus predicted that the second Temple in Jerusalem would be destroyed.

Approximately, 40 years later (70 A.D.) the Romans under Titus destroyed this temple in response to Jewish rebellion.

Also, the Bible (the Word of God) predicted that Israel would become a nation again (Ezekiel 36:33-35). This prophecy was "fulfilled" in 1948.

Here's many prophecies about the Lord Jesus that He fulfilled:

Click https://bible.org/article/messianic-prophecies

A mythological book about Thor has “never” revealed scientific facts “thousands and hundreds” of years before modern scientists discovered and confirmed them, “nor” has it predicted “real-life” historical events “thousands and hundreds” of years “before” they occurred.

So your comparison is “easily” refuted and exploded.

Let these sayings sink down into your ears.

Now, just in case you have not seen this post:

Did the Lord Jesus Christ truly rise from the dead as the Bible reveals?

Here are some reasons why I believe that He did:

YouTube video

YouTube video

Why I Believe in the Resurrection by Chip Ingram

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z2mAzeFgSDxA_Z0In4QsGTS8NImQ2GA8nLSjAMzmIpQ/edit

Extra-Biblical Historical Evidence for the LIFE, DEATH, and RESURRECTION of JESUS
ANCIENT NON-CHRISTIAN SOURCES

Click http://www.westarkchurchofchrist.org/library/extrabiblical.htm

Why We Believe Jesus Rose from the Dead

Click https://bible.org/illustration/why-we-believe-jesus-rose-dead

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
2. YouTube links aren’t proof? Then someone should break the news to Patience_Leech.

Spell my name right, please. Or just Leech.

The evidence for evolution is greatly enhanced with visual aides.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
3. I “keep” giving you “proof” but you won’t examine it (i.e. links to “scientific” facts revealed in the Bible thousands and hundreds of years before modern scientists discovered them, and prophecies which predict historical events with “better-than-laser-precision”, and “accuracy”).

It’s not my fault that you appear to be “afraid” of finding out the truth.

Also, I didn’t know that “eyewitness” testimony was not acceptable.

None of those prophecies have been confirmed by legitimate historians. There's even very little evidence that Jesus even existed. It's much more likely that it was written as a myth, especially considering all the borrowing the Bible did with previous "gods."

And contrary to what you seem to think, the one making the extraordinary claims (You) are required to supply extraordinary evidence.

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”

~Carl Sagan

You are making the claim that a book was written by a superbeing deity and that miracles were performed. That requires some significant evidence. And some flimsy claims of fulfilled prophesy and some delusional clowns talking on a stage is not good enough evidence. It is evidence of a sort, but it is extremely weak evidence that is not deserving of the sort of devotion it seems to inspire in people like you.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
You both totally IGNORED the most important point that made:

NONE of the NUMEROUS people that I listed (i.e. Budda, Muhammad, Confucius, etc.) EVER ROSE FROM THE DEAD, and/or REMAINED ALIVE--like the Lord Jesus.

No I understand perfectly, Jesus is the most powerful fictional character out of that group of fictional characters.

Originally posted by JesusLovesYou
Yes, satan is the god of this age; the prince (or ruler) of this world.

That's why the world is so sinful, rebellious to God, evil, wicked, corrupt, unfair, unequal, and unjust.

That’s why there’s murder, terrorism, poverty, sickness, nuclear weapons, famine, recession, inflation, accidents, disease, natural disasters, pornography, drug addiction, alcoholism, theft, prostitution, mental illness, flooding or floods, natural disasters, bestiality, homosexuality, lesbianism gay lifestyle, bisexuality, transgenderism, embezzlement, depression, child molestations, abortion centers, war, sex trafficking, illegal drugs, guns, rape, masturbation, sodomy, gangs, genocide, racism, horoscopes, tarot cards, seances, Ouija boards, Angel boards, spirit guides, psychics, sorcery, demons, necromancy (i.e. talking to the dead like Luke Skywalker does with dead Obi-Wan), augury (i.e. interpreting omens), witchcraft, soothsaying (i.e. fortune telling), conjuring, spells, voodoo, hoodoo, santeria, devil worship/satanism, divination, the practice of mediums (i.e. calling up the dead—which are really demons disguised as, and impersonating loved ones, spiritism (or spiritualism), animism, the occult, wicca, false religions (i.e. Islam, Mormonism, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists, Catholicism, Buddhism, Hinduism, all salvation-based on/works-based religions, etc.), stargazing (i.e. astrology), prognostication, death, sorrow, and pain.

Have you ever heard the phrase, "Hell on Earth."?

Did you ever wonder where that phrase came from?

The suffering and torment that people experience in this life as a result of sin, death, the curse, and the devil—PALES IN COMPARISON to the suffering and torment that awaits them in Hell (IF THEY DIE IN THEIR SINS WITHOUT CHRIST).

As far as the Father (God) drawing me to His Son, you do err, not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God. In addition, you do not know how God operates. You see, God is Love, so EVERYTHING that He does is a MANIFESTATION of Who He is (which is Love).

So LOVE drew me to His Son.

It has NOTHING to do with the mind.

You see, God is a SPIRIT, and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth. But let me digress for a moment. The love that you have for someone (be it a parent, sibling, relative, friend, significant other, pet, etc.), was it what DREW you to him or her? Was it what DREW him or her to you? Was there any “mind rape” involved in that love?

So wait, even stargazing is evil? And Satan created horoscopes? Okay. I'm guessing he created the magic 8 ball too(Thanks Satan!!).

Even inflation is apparently the work of Satan. Damn, this guy gets around, doesn't he? Also apparently literally every accident is the work of the devil. One time I accidentally dropped a cup and it broke. F*ck you Satan.

Though I have to say if God is a manifestation of "love" then we humans clearly have been using the word incorrectly all these years.

Oops. Six posts above this one should be Part 1/3, "not" Part 1/2.

JesusLovesYou, I have to say I can see the appeal to your beliefs. Literally nothing is ever your fault, it's all rooted in some cosmic evil.

Like right now, if I set an orphanage on fire...that's Satan, right?

Well wait, that begs another question: if Satan causes this evil, why do we suffer for our sins? Shouldn't Lucifer be roasting on an open fire, and not some serial killer? Cuz Lucifer is the cause of murder and rape and all that.

So not only does God hold us accountable for the past sins of people, but he apparently blames us even when some cosmic evil causes us to do horrible shit. It essentially seems like the decks are stacked against us. Either we resist some cosmic evil or we're screwed. Also this whole dichotomy is something a psychopath would come up with, you do realize that right? There is no way a non-crazy person does this.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Spell my name right, please. Or just Leech.

The evidence for evolution is greatly enhanced with visual aides.

None of those prophecies have been confirmed by legitimate historians. There's even very little evidence that Jesus even existed. It's much more likely that it was written as a myth, especially considering all the borrowing the Bible did with previous "gods."

And contrary to what you seem to think, the one making the extraordinary claims (You) are required to supply extraordinary evidence.

You are making the claim that a book was written by a superbeing deity and that miracles were performed. That requires some significant evidence. And some flimsy claims of fulfilled prophesy and some delusional clowns talking on a stage is not good enough evidence. It is evidence of a sort, but it is extremely weak evidence that is not deserving of the sort of devotion it seems to inspire in people like you.

Spell my name right, please. Or just Leech.

The evidence for evolution is greatly enhanced with visual aides.

I apologize for misspelling your name.

What evidence for evolution?

The evidence that the Bible is the Word of God is found in this post:

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zh6uRFqKw5ZibUuGDT1kujGsT1huB17NZ42LDWhLNUA/edit

None of those prophecies have been confirmed by legitimate historians. There's even very little evidence that Jesus even existed. It's much more likely that it was written as a myth, especially considering all the borrowing the Bible did with previous "gods."

What’s a legitimate historian?

There’s “plenty” of evidence that the Lord Jesus exists, “you” just refuse to accept it. For example, there’s “extra-biblical” evidence that the Lord Jesus existed.

Click http://www.westarkchurchofchrist.org/library/extrabiblical.htm

There’s numerous “miracles” taking place in the “Name of Jesus” that continue to baffle the medical community on a “regular” basis, or that continue to take place “all over the world”.

As a result of the Name of Jesus, people have been, and are being healed of all kinds of sicknesses, diseases, and many other health issues.

In the Wonderful Name of Jesus people have been, and are being raised from the dead, and delivered from demonic possession, and “every” addiction (e.g. drug addiction, porn addiction, alcohol addiction, pain medication addiction, and all other addictions).

Not to mention the ”personal testimony” of “billions” of Christians/believers who worship Him, call Jesus Christ Lord, and praise Him (many of which are called by Him to be His ministers to teach and preach His Word, and/or who have seen Him, and do continue to see Him in dreams, visions, or on a visits to Heaven in the spirit).

Lastly, the Bible (which is “eyewitness testimony that you inexplicably refuse to accept), which prophesied the resurrection of the Lord Jesus.

You see, without the resurrection of the Lord Jesus—“no believer” has “any” hope of eternal life. But thanks be to God Who raised His Dear Son from the dead by the power of the Holy Spirit.

Praise Father, Son, and Holy Spirit forevermore!

Borrowing? What are you talking about?

Myth?

Based on all of the information that I’ve provided, it is “impossible’” for the Bible to be a myth.

But you just made a “claim” that the Bible borrows gods (whatever that means)—now support it with facts.

And contrary to what you seem to think, the one making the extraordinary claims (You) are required to supply extraordinary evidence.

Every time that I provide “extraordinary” evidence you run. Are you “afraid” of the Truth?

But, if you want that “extraordinary proof”, here it is again.

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UMjov8MdfqiYthQ9E0GHq_8hgBSD4kCBy8H0j8iAJGE/edit

Click https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aU0yowcoZGNbQe_G_AZpZ2fd16g54yOJF9l_VAGwxY4/edit

You are making the claim that a book was written by a superbeing deity and that miracles were performed. That requires some significant evidence. And some flimsy claims of fulfilled prophesy and some delusional clowns talking on a stage is not good enough evidence. It is evidence of a sort, but it is extremely weak evidence that is not deserving of the sort of devotion it seems to inspire in people like you.

I never said anything about a “superbeing”.

I said “God”.

There’s “plenty” of evidence. But I’m done doing “your” homework for today.

Go on YouTube (your “go to source for evidence”), type in “miracles”, and let me know what you find out. You can either do that or visit hospitals and ask to speak to any doctor that has ever seen, or experienced a “miracle”. Also, you can visit any “true” Bible-believing, Christ Jesus worshipping, church and ask them for any evidence of miracles. There’s a number of things that you can do if you “really” want to know the Truth.

Do you really want to know the Truth?

You read that correctly people. He just suggested you go on youtube and type in "miracles' and see what happens.

Who knew that evidence of God and his almighty power was just a few clicks away?

*types it into youtube*

Ohh....oh I see. So in this case we are calling anything science can't currently explain a "miracle". Implying you feel we already know everything there is to know about science and thus if we can't explain something it must be jesus magic.