Ozymandias vs. Black Panther

Originally posted by h1a8
Yet his suit was undamaged, Black widow survived, etc. Just movie physics. The writer had no intention of that being a durability feat. So it isn’t.

Opinion's of what a writer might have intended are irrelevant when we have visual proof

Originally posted by Robtard
Opinion's of what a writer might have intended are irrelevant when we have visual proof

Windows snipping tool + MS Paint = best wins.

LMAO is Troll1 seriously trying to compare BW ducking behind cover to T'Challa running at the explosion?

Also keep in mind T'Chaka was the current Black Panther. So it was powerful enough to kill a superhuman on the level of Cap, etc...

Originally posted by Robtard
Opinion's of what a writer might have intended are irrelevant when we have visual proof

Visual proof says its not a durability feat.
1. He looks like he got pushed away
2. His clothes have 0 damage

Originally posted by h1a8
Visual proof says its not a durability feat.
1. He looks like he got pushed away
2. His clothes have 0 damage

Visual proof says that Ozy doesn't have enhanced speed.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Visual proof says that Ozy doesn't have enhanced speed.

If that is the case then that's a very slow bullet.
Bucky's robot arm went slow and thus little power. So T'Challa gets no durability feat. And Ozy just beats him due to being more skilled and visually quicker.

Originally posted by h1a8
If that is the case then that's a very slow bullet.
Bucky's robot arm went slow and thus little power. So T'Challa gets no durability feat. And Ozy just beats him due to being more skilled and visually quicker.

Only per your standard of visual proof. Ozy doesn't have enhanced speed. plus, Ozy's arms also moved slow and therefore he doesn't have enhanced strength either.

IOW, using your standards. Ozy just has normal speed and strength.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Only per your standard of visual proof. Ozy doesn't have enhanced speed. plus, Ozy's arms also moved slow and therefore he doesn't have enhanced strength either.

IOW, using your standards. Ozy just has normal speed and strength.

Originally posted by h1a8
Assuming your logic is correct then he still beats T'Challa. That's all that matters.

First, it's your logic and secondly, BP wins.

Originally posted by Silent Master
First, it's your logic and secondly, BP wins.

How would BP win? He's slower, less skilled, and weaker.

Originally posted by h1a8
How would BP win? He's slower, less skilled, and weaker.

Prove it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove it.

When Ozy fights both he snaps out attacks faster than anything T'Challa has shown.
He is able to beat two very skilled fighters without being touched.
Hes able to kick a human (while he was lying on the ground) through the air.
He was able to lift a 200+ lb human and throw him 15-20ft through a skyscraper window.

Your first two statements aren't true and the rest are covered under your "the movies physics" argument.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your first two statements aren't true and the rest are covered under your "the movies physics" argument.

They are. Ozy snaps punches out very quickly. Rorschach attacks with very fast speed and Ozy casually parries it. Post an attack by BP that is faster.

Ozy beats two very skilled opponents without getting hit.

How is that not true?

The movies physics of picking someone up and throwing them is real physics. There was no contradiction in the movie.

YouTube video

So, according to H1, no clothing damage invalidates anything else we are shown or told? Like the fact that we see the explosion devastate a segment of the building and are told there are multiple casualties, and despite the fact that T'Chaka's own clothing took minimal damage, yet he was fatally wounded?

So, by H1's logic here, Luke Cage surviving a direct hit from a rocket launcher in his own show, and then having the building he was in collapse on him, is not a valid durability feat, as his hoodie and jeans were undamaged at the end (as can visibly be seen after he gets out of the rubble).

This guy, lol.

I'm about to fight h1a8.

According to his logic you'd lose.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
So, according to H1, no clothing damage invalidates anything else we are shown or told? Like the fact that we see the explosion devastate a segment of the building and are told there are multiple casualties, and despite the fact that T'Chaka's own clothing took minimal damage, yet he was fatally wounded?

So, [B]by H1's logic here, Luke Cage surviving a direct hit from a rocket launcher in his own show, and then having the building he was in collapse on him, is not a valid durability feat, as his hoodie and jeans were undamaged at the end (as can visibly be seen after he gets out of the rubble).

This guy, lol. [/B]

Black Widow survived. And T'Challa clothes weren't damaged.

Also a building falling on you doesn't have to damage your clothes. Even the woman wasn't visibly damaged outside of something falling on her leg.