Originally posted by ILS
Yeah, I'm sure someone who was just recently knighted and who gets taken out by blaster bolts which Ki-Adi-Mundi had no issues deflecting, is above Maul, Dooku, Kenobi etc. Makes so much sense.
Not to mention I'm willing to bet that some of the stwor characters you're using this scaling to place kenobi and maul above also can deflect blaster fire better.
If you're going to take the feat as something Anu can replicate at will(because if it's simply an expression of potential, you can't scale from it), it being far more impressive than anything Kenobi or Maul have done would place her as more powerful than they are.
Her rank isn't remotely relevant. If she's stopping star destroyers with one hand, she clearly a prodigee, you'll need more than an absence of evidence here. In absence of scaling, the character who's demonstrated greater power should be taken to be more powerful.
You can't give characters scaling they don't get.
Thana is shit even by TOR standards, but let's keep pretending she's some all powerful god that could blow up city blocks.
Metal burns in fires too. It's like talking to a bunch of 9/11 truthers.
Originally posted by Zenwolf
TCW shouldn't even be Legends in the first place(as a whole, minor things aside), it should just be Canon only while the Legends timeline has the CWMMP.
No, because Legends only content, like the Jedi Path, involve TCW characters. TCW is in the same place as the movies.
Originally posted by Geistalt
True.Child Thana's still done more impressive things with the Force than anything I've seen from Maul. Though I'm sure Maul's a better duelist.
This is why I have saber-only and Force-only rankings.