Originally posted by NibedicusH1 has his head in the sand. According to him, it just means Thor can take a little heat. He's basically the golgo of lowballing.
The above video shows that Thor tanked 2x10^20J. Not even bullshitting here.That is about 4x more energy than the entirety of the US nuclear arsenal.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
The above video shows that Thor tanked 2x10^20J. Not even bullshitting here.That is about 4x more energy than the entirety of the US nuclear arsenal.
Wrong! The video makes some assumptions (which are false).
Neutron star output is an assumption. In reality they are very dim. Their luminosity could be hundreds to thousands of times dimmer.
Thor most likely experience the full tempurature of the star. Imagine focusing the sun's energy through a magnifying glass.
Magnetic fields, etc were non existent since Rocket and others were not affected.
Originally posted by h1a8Sorry, I trust guys that put in the work to not only research stuff and create a video that is from a non-biased perspective than you. In fact no one takes you seriously so I'm not sure why you try.
Wrong! The video makes some assumptions (which are false).
Neutron star output is an assumption. In reality they are very dim. Their luminosity could be hundreds to thousands of times dimmer.Thor most likely experience the full tempurature of the star. Imagine focusing the sun's energy through a magnifying glass.
Magnetic fields, etc were non existent since Rocket and others were not affected.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
H1 has his head in the sand. According to him, it just means Thor can take a little heat. He's basically the golgo of lowballing.
Everyone who seened the movie thought, "heat and temperature of a star".
No one thought about anything else.
Then come Rage who make up some BS about the words are taken literally.
Everyone (marvel bias fans) jumps on the bandwagon.
But again, no one thought about what Rage said when they saw the movie. That should tell you writer's intentions.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Sorry, I trust guys that put in the work to not only research stuff and create a video that is from a non-biased perspective than you. In fact no one takes you seriously so I'm not sure why you try.
👆
I think he just wants the attention. Gotta feel sorry for the kid. Well, almost.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Sorry, I trust guys that put in the work to not only research stuff and create a video that is from a non-biased perspective than you. In fact no one takes you seriously so I'm not sure why you try.
I would not lie to you when I said he made some assumptions (not facts). He even says so.
If you build an entire theory on something that's false then the entire theory is false.
Other sources have Neutron stars being very dim. Much dimmer than what he is ASSUMING.
Originally posted by h1a8
I would not lie to you when I said he made some assumptions (not facts). He even says so.If you build an entire theory on something that's false then the entire theory is false.
Other sources have Neutron stars being very dim. Much dimmer than what he is ASSUMING.
Geez, it's like you can't stop lying.
(6:05)
"From the papers and values that I could find, the average luminosity of a neutron star is..."
Aka. Not an assumption. He did research. He even provided sources at the bottom of the info section of the video.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
Geez, it's like you can't stop lying.(6:05)
"From the papers and values that I could find, the average luminosity of a neutron star is..."
Aka. Not an assumption. He did research. He even provided sources at the bottom of the info section of the video.
The papers he can find is an assumption.
I wasn't referring to him saying" assumption" then.
He said if we assume that... while explaining about the energy output.
The full force of the star would have crushed everything within a 600 mile radius with its gravitational force alone.
Honestly arguing this is stupid because we have obviously seen Thor hurt multiple times by far less. He was KOd earlier in the movie from the ship explosion. Thats not a bad feat as a lot happened but I'm sure it's less than the Star feat
Originally posted by h1a8
Wrong! The video makes some assumptions (which are false).
Neutron star output is an assumption. In reality they are very dim. Their luminosity could be hundreds to thousands of times dimmer.Thor most likely experience the full tempurature of the star. Imagine focusing the sun's energy through a magnifying glass.
Magnetic fields, etc were non existent since Rocket and others were not affected.
Talk about double standards, all of your numbers are based on assumptions yet you demand we take them as gospel. yet when someone that is clearly far smarter than you does the same thing. you want us to dismiss it and instead take your word.
Originally posted by h1a8
The papers he can find is an assumption.
🙄
Originally posted by Nibedicus
Not an assumption. He did research. He even provided sources at the bottom of the info section of the video.
Originally posted by h1a8
I wasn't referring to him saying" assumption" then.
You are just incoherently babbling now. WTF does this even mean?
Originally posted by h1a8
He said if we assume that... while explaining about the energy output.
Provide timestamps and stop being a lazy prick.
Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
The full force of the star would have crushed everything within a 600 mile radius with its gravitational force alone.Honestly arguing this is stupid because we have obviously seen Thor hurt multiple times by far less. He was KOd earlier in the movie from the ship explosion. Thats not a bad feat as a lot happened but I'm sure it's less than the Star feat
And Superman was ko'd after failing to support part of an oil rig. I guess that means he isn't very strong or durable.
Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
The full force of the star would have crushed everything within a 600 mile radius with its gravitational force alone.Honestly arguing this is stupid because we have obviously seen Thor hurt multiple times by far less. He was KOd earlier in the movie from the ship explosion. Thats not a bad feat as a lot happened but I'm sure it's less than the Star feat
Characters get outlier "feats" all the time. From what I'm hearing from you, you don't like it so you just want to disregard it.
BTW, he was already beaten half to death offscreen to the point he was crawling on the ground. Kind of a sucky basis for a KO showing there.
Originally posted by h1a8
Everyone who seened the movie thought, "heat and temperature of a star".
No one thought about anything else.
Then come Rage who make up some BS about the words are taken literally.
Everyone (marvel bias fans) jumps on the bandwagon.But again, no one thought about what Rage said when they saw the movie. That should tell you writer's intentions.
.....
😂
So...it's my fault, that Etri SPECIFIED, in almost a fanboy battle board manner: "You understand boy, you are about take the FULL FORCE of a Star."
A video was just posted in this thread of some trendy youtube scientist fruitloop speculating on how much force he withstood at being about 700x the entire US nuclear arsenal. Was that because of me too?
Am I like the Schrodinger Thor fan? It is not until I mention a Thor feat that the feat IS?
What a clown.
Originally posted by Silent Master
And Superman was ko'd after failing to support part of an oil rig. I guess that means he isn't very strong or durable.
Did you read the part where I said it isnt a low or weak feat? The point was this Star feat is not as bad as H1 makes it out to be and isnt as great as others are making it seem. Thor is not invincible and neither is Superman. Are we just suppose to forget everything that has happened to Thor?
Originally posted by Nibedicus
Characters get outlier "feats" all the time. From what I'm hearing from you, you don't like it so you just want to disregard it.BTW, he was already beaten half to death offscreen to the point he was crawling on the ground. Kind of a sucky basis for a KO showing there.
He is one of those people that like to dismiss high end showings by bringing in lower ones for characters he doesn't like/want to win.
Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
Did you read the part where I said it isnt a low or weak feat? The point was this Star feat is not as bad as H1 makes it out to be and isnt as great as others are making it seem. Thor is not invincible and neither is Superman. Are we just suppose to forget everything that has happened to Thor?
I saw the part where you acted just like h1, IE you want us to ignore the gravity/magnetic force aspect because you don't like it.
Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
Did you read the part where I said it isnt a low or weak feat? The point was this Star feat is not as bad as H1 makes it out to be and isnt as great as others are making it seem. Thor is not invincible and neither is Superman. Are we just suppose to forget everything that has happened to Thor?
Should we disregard the science-y youtube guy, too? He doesn't seem to be a MCU fanboy. Although, his haircut might seem suspicious.
Maybe he's Rage posing as an internet science expert, building credentials along the way to solidify his credibility, biding his time and waiting for Thor to one day have a decent "feat" so he can highball the f-ck out of it. And no one would ever be the wiser. Bwahaha. BWAHAHA! 😈
Oh shit! That's actually pretty feasible...
🙁