What Jordan Peterson says

Started by Surtur32 pages
Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
And?

This dude is so triggered even people who compliment him feel it lol. Damn. Hilarious.

Originally posted by The Lost

How are the left forcing negative identity politics?

What you mean they make people "believe" they're more helpless than they actually are?

What new problems have we created?

https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/how-people-whitesplain-racism/

https://www.buzzfeed.com/melissaboyajian/women-try-manspreading-for-a-week?utm_term=.kbnY1W9YL#.qcbGdKEGw

https://mronline.org/2018/06/20/times-up-for-capitalist-patriarchal-racism-and-not-just-for-the-men-who-perform-it/

YouTube video

https://openparliament.ca/bills/42-1/C-16/

http://uk.businessinsider.com/mark-meechan-fined-youtube-video-of-dog-giving-nazi-salute-2018-4?r=US&IR=T

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/transgender-female-boxer-gives-female-opponent-concussion-breaks-her-eye-so

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/genderfluid-parents-non-binary-son/

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-42652947

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/29514-unmasking-antifa-act-proposed-in-u-s-house-left-responds-accordingly

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/01/16/uc-berkeley-sued-injuries-sustained-antifa-riot/

https://www.buzzfeed.com/hnigatu/racial-microagressions-you-hear-on-a-daily-basis?utm_term=.dj2v8MAv5#.td84Jm94v

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/22/us/as-diversity-increases-slights-get-subtler-but-still-sting.html

http://neguswhoread.com/wypipo-explained/

http://kinfolkkollective.com/

https://www.dailydot.com/via/reverse-racism-doesnt-exist/

http://uk.businessinsider.com/asian-american-groups-doj-affirmative-action-definition-ivy-league-harvard-2018-2?r=US&IR=T

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/21/police-kill-more-whites-than-blacks-but-minority-d/

Originally posted by Surtur
Yep...you're not triggered at all.

One thing I've noticed is whenever a left-leaning debater is more direct, assertive, or hostile in a debate he's "unhinged" or "triggered". But when a right-winger does it he's the victim and he is just stating his mind? Freedom speech, y'all.

I mean, I agree the Lost isn't really keeping his cool here, but I wouldn't say he's triggered, just annoyed.

Originally posted by MythLord
One thing I've noticed is whenever a left-leaning debater is more direct, assertive, or hostile in a debate he's "unhinged" or "triggered". But when a right-winger does it he's the victim and he is just stating his mind? Freedom speech, y'all.

I mean, I agree the Lost isn't really keeping his cool here, but I wouldn't say he's triggered, just annoyed.

Seems triggered. Keeps posting crazed rants.

You can state your mind without coming off unhinged.

But we see this everywhere. Someone here on the right points out how someone is behaving they are said to be playing the victim, someone on the left does and they just get a pat on the back.

Originally posted by MythLord
One thing I've noticed is whenever a left-leaning debater is more direct, assertive, or hostile in a debate he's "unhinged" or "triggered". But when a right-winger does it he's the victim and he is just stating his mind? Freedom speech, y'all.

I mean, I agree the Lost isn't really keeping his cool here, but I wouldn't say he's triggered, just annoyed.

Rob and Putin call Surt triggered all the time. WTF, lol. Also, the recent SU episodes were way too rushed!!

Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
Rob and Putin call Surt triggered all the time. WTF, lol.

And they do the "you're felating this poster" if I agree with someone else. But when they do it...nope, they aren't jerking each other off. It's totally different, somehow. Lol.

And then they act so damn shocked when it is brought to their attention.

Them being long, wordy and assertive doesn't mean they're rants or even that Lost is triggered.

I don't think he's unhinged, just annoyed. And I'm not exactly a part of the Left circle-jerk here, even if I do agree with some of the stuff they say.

As for the victim thing, it really depends on the environment, doesn't it? The Right would say Lost is unhinged, the Left would say he's correct. The Left would say Scribble is playing the victim, the Right would say he's being reasonable.

Idgaf personally. This is entertaining to read.

Originally posted by Scribble
Anyway, back to Peterson (which is the topic fyi): I consider him to possibly be one of the greatest enemies of the alt-right and the rising interest in far-right ideologies amongst young people in the West, especially in terms of actually doing something about them. He's laid out empirically why their pitiful misogynistic and racist ideologies are puerile without attacking them, and instead has given those willing to listen a method of actually improving as people and becoming less susceptible to being entranced by the dangerous ideas peddled by sites such as InfoWars.

Instead of seeing them as 'enemies', he sees them for what they really are: lost and confused young people who are grabbing out for a sense of meaning. By empathising with them instead of dehumanising them, he is actually helping them to turn away from those wanting to control their minds and use them for extremist purposes, and impressing upon them an individualist ethos that, if embraced by all people in the West, would be a much more useful solution to identity intolerance.

When the Left starts taking this approach instead of forcing further negative identity politics and social division upon people (and making them believe to be more helpless than they actually are), then we'll start seeing some real change. Many on the Left are getting sick of it, and it (hopefully) won't be long before this corrupting intersectional approach finally consumes itself. Then we can get back to actually solving the world's problems, instead of fueling the ones we have / creating new ones.

Query: If the Alt-Right are just "lost and confused young people who are grabbing out for a sense of meaning" and Peterson is trying to help them via empathy tactics, why isn't the same said about the Alt-Right's counterparts on the Left?

I'd also say people who go around chanting "Jews will not replace us!" are probably a bit more than just lost/confused.

Originally posted by Surtur
And they do the "you're felating this poster" if I agree with someone else. But when they do it...nope, they aren't jerking each other off. It's totally different, somehow. Lol.

And then they act so damn shocked when it is brought to their attention.

Stop playing the victim for once in your life, okay?

Originally posted by MythLord
Them being long, wordy and assertive doesn't mean they're rants or even that Lost is triggered.

I don't think he's unhinged, just annoyed. And I'm not exactly a part of the Left circle-jerk here, even if I do agree with some of the stuff they say.

As for the victim thing, it really depends on the environment, doesn't it? The Right would say Lost is unhinged, the Left would say he's correct. The Left would say Scribble is playing the victim, the Right would say he's being reasonable.

Idgaf personally. This is entertaining to read.

In the topic about the WH edited out of a transcript Putins support for Trump this person was saying it was not really hysteria to compare it to Pearl Harbor and Kristallnacht.

No sorry, that's unhinged as f*ck to me. We can agree to disagree then.

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop playing the victim for once in your life, okay?

Lol just proving my point. Do better kid.

Originally posted by Robtard
Query: If the Alt-Right are just "lost and confused young people who are grabbing out for a sense of meaning" and Peterson is trying to help them via empathy tactics, why isn't the same said about the Alt-Right's counterparts on the Left?

I'd also say people who go around chanting "Jews will not replace us!" are probably a bit more than just lost/confused.

You're kidding, right? The people shouting crazy shit about Jews are the most confused and lost of us all. What kind of rational or sane person says that kind of rubbish? Does Xyz seem like a level-headed, calm person?

Also, Peterson does say the same about those on the Left. He says that it's a travesty to see students being radicalised into a socialist and Marxist thought-bubble by those that are supposed to be equipping them with the tools to help them get ahead in life. Both scenarios are upsetting examples of young people going astray into (socially and personally) dangerous modes of thought.

Why are we all defending a fraud?

dunno man

Originally posted by MythLord
As for the victim thing, it really depends on the environment, doesn't it? The Right would say Lost is unhinged, the Left would say he's correct. The Left would say Scribble is playing the victim, the Right would say he's being reasonable.
A nice summation of one of the things rotten at the core of current political discourse, imo. Never-ending partisan rubbish. No leeway allowed.

Originally posted by Surtur
In the topic about the WH edited out of a transcript Putins support for Trump this person was saying it was not really hysteria to compare it to Pearl Harbor and Kristallnacht.

No sorry, that's unhinged as f*ck to me. We can agree to disagree then.


An... odd position to take, yeah.

Originally posted by Scribble
A nice summation of one of the things rotten at the core of current political discourse, imo. Never-ending partisan rubbish. No leeway allowed.

Agreed, yeah. It's always the Us vs Them narrative.

Originally posted by MythLord
Agreed, yeah. It's always the Us vs Them narrative.

White Diamond is shit!

Originally posted by Scribble
You're kidding, right? The people shouting crazy shit about Jews are the most confused and lost of us all. What kind of rational or sane person says that kind of rubbish? Does Xyz seem like a level-headed, calm person?

Also, Peterson does say the same about those on the Left. He says that it's a travesty to see students being radicalised into a socialist and Marxist thought-bubble by those that are supposed to be equipping them with the tools to help them get ahead in life. Both scenarios are upsetting examples of young people going astray into (socially and personally) dangerous modes of thought.

Huh? I quite literally implied that those types are more than just "lost and confused", they're pieces of shit imo.

Is he reaching out to them as well to help them out? Also seems like the level of reproach is more heavily handed to the Left than the Right.

Originally posted by MythLord
An... odd position to take, yeah.

What you call odd I call batshit insane lol.

It's almost like a form of holocaust denial if these people really think this shit is comparable and will "live in infamy" like these things. It is the same when you had people calling the places we detained kids "concentration camps".

Either they do not think the nazis were really that bad or they are not actually aware of what they are talking about.