Thanos w/o IG vs. Thor w/o SB

Originally posted by FrothByte
Your rock/wall analogy is flawed since the rock bounced off the wall and didn't make the wall fall down. Thor's lightning didn't just bounce off Thanos, it actually knocked him down. Any hit strong enough to knock you off your feet is not a hit that you can take repeatedly without injury.

You keep acting like Thanos completely tanked the lightning which wasn't the case.

So I'm still waiting for you to provide proof that Thanos can withstand multiple lightning hits from Thor.

Thor surprised Thanos, he wasn't ready to receive the attack. And furthermore, pushing Thanos doesn't mean he was hurt. Thanos was fine, so prove Lightning can damage Thanos, otherwise Thanos is winning this EASILY!

Watch IW again buddy. And stop your fanboyism.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thor surprised Thanos, he wasn't ready to receive the attack. And furthermore, pushing Thanos doesn't mean he was hurt. Thanos was fine, so prove Lightning can damage Thanos, otherwise Thanos is winning this EASILY!

Watch IW again buddy. And stop your fanboyism.

Again, any hit strong enough to faceplant someone is strong enough to seriously hurt given enough repetition. This is fact and is seen in real life. If you want to claim that Thanos is exempt from this rule then it's up to you to prove it.

So far I have provided multiple on screen feats to back up my argument, you have provided none at all. Are you unable to back up your argument?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thor surprised Thanos, he wasn't ready to receive the attack. And furthermore, pushing Thanos doesn't mean he was hurt. Thanos was fine, so prove Lightning can damage Thanos, otherwise Thanos is winning this EASILY!

Thanos was fighting for his life after that shot that you claim did nothing.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Thanos was fighting for his life after that shot that you claim did nothing.

Your speculation is astonishing? And? Doesnt prove anything.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Again, any hit strong enough to faceplant someone is strong enough to seriously hurt given enough repetition. This is fact and is seen in real life. If you want to claim that Thanos is exempt from this rule then it's up to you to prove it.

So far I have provided multiple on screen feats to back up my argument, you have provided none at all. Are you unable to back up your argument?

Being pushed =/= being hurt.

Bringing fallacies wont help your case.

Thanos withstood a lightning attack from Thor without damage. The feat supports Thanos. If YOU want to claim that lightning can damage OR DEFEAT Thanos its on you to prove it!

So do you have evidence that lightning can hurt Thanos or just your SPECULATION!? Seems to me you are speculating son! I thought you were the "movie feats only" guy.....Double standards Froth?

Well, in that case. the power stone didn't leave any visible damage on Thor. Thus Thor withstood an attack by the power stone with no damage. as such. Thanos w/o any stones will be incapable of doing any real damage to Thor.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Well, in that case. the power stone didn't leave any visible damage on Thor. Thus Thor withstood an attack by the power stone with no damage. as such. Thanos w/o any stones will be incapable of doing any real damage to Thor.

Wow, didn't expect you here so soon SM. Seems like Froth is really in the urge huh! 😂

Was that supposed to make sense?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Was that supposed to make sense?

Hmmmm...Not really. I mean, are you capable of making sense? 😂

After reading your reply in where you suggest that Thor is immune to the PS, its more than clear that you are not.

My point

Your head.

Originally posted by Silent Master
My point

Your head.

Nice to see you are still as funny as always 😂

Now, if you excuse me, I will wait for your elder brother to reply (He is taking long, I bet he is desperate watching IW for evidence that Thanos can be defeated with lightning)

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Being pushed =/= being hurt.

Bringing fallacies wont help your case.

Thanos withstood a lightning attack from Thor without damage. The feat supports Thanos. If YOU want to claim that lightning can damage OR DEFEAT Thanos its on you to prove it!

So do you have evidence that lightning can hurt Thanos or just your SPECULATION!? Seems to me you are speculating son! I thought you were the "movie feats only" guy.....Double standards Froth?

I already provided proof, multiple ones. You have not brought a single one. You're dependent on no limits fallacy. Using your logic we can say Thanos can't hurt Spiderman since numerous hits from Thanos never injured Spiderman.

For that matter, you have no proof Thanos can take charged punches from Thor, especially when a direct hit from IM can make Thanos bleed.

Also, only a complete idiot would equate a lightning strike with a push.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I already provided proof, multiple ones. You have not brought a single one. You're dependent on no limits fallacy. Using your logic we can say Thanos can't hurt Spiderman since numerous hits from Thanos never injured Spiderman.

For that matter, you have no proof Thanos can take charged punches from Thor, especially when a direct hit from IM can make Thanos bleed.

Also, only a complete idiot would equate a lightning strike with a push.

You have provided nothing! All you've done is bring fallacies and speculations.

The fact that the lightning pushed an unaware, not-prepared Thanos doesn't mean he was hurt. Specially not after he stood up just fine to address the threat! So, no!

The only idiot here is the one (Or should i say are) claiming that lightning can harm Thanos, whereas the movie has proven otherwise!

Stop your nonesense Froth!

Go and watch IW fellow!

^ Someone sounds butthurt.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ Someone sounds butthurt.

Am not the one trying to bend the movie feats here boy.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
You have provided nothing! All you've done is bring fallacies and speculations.

The fact that the lightning pushed an unaware, not-prepared Thanos doesn't mean he was hurt. Specially not after he stood up just fine to address the threat! So, no!

[B]The only idiot here is the one (Or should i say are) claiming that lightning can harm Thanos, whereas the movie has proven otherwise!

Stop your nonesense Froth!

Go and watch IW fellow! [/B]

Here's everything I have brought to the table so far:

1. Thor's lightning has proven strong enough to knock down Thanos and slam his face on the ground.
2. Any strike strong enough to knock down someone is not a strike that person can take repeatedly without sustaining injury - this is fact, something that you haven't even addressed yet.
3. IM's strongest hit managed to cut Thanos
4. Thor's feats prove that his lightning is more powerful and more destructive than IM's strongest hits
5. Thor has been shown capable of sustaining a continuous barrage of his lightning.
6. Thor's charged strikes against Hulk were more powerful than any single physical strike we've seen from Thanos. The proof is seen in their respective fights to Hulk
7. There's no proof that Thanos can tank multiple charged lightning blows from Thor without injury, especially since IM's strongest hits already wounded him.

You, on the other hand, have brought nothing to back up your arguments. Your argument that Thanos survived a single lightning blast from Thor without injury is not proof that he can withstand multiple lightning blasts. Using that logic, we can say that Thanos can't injure Spiderman through pure h2h since none of Thanos' punches were able to injure Spiderman. Is this the kind of shitty debate tactic you want to use?

I'm willing to bet instead of actually providing your own proof, all you're going to do is criticize what I've provided.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Here's everything I have brought to the table so far:

1. Thor's lightning has proven strong enough to knock down Thanos and slam his face on the ground.
2. Any strike strong enough to knock down someone is not a strike that person can take repeatedly without sustaining injury - this is fact, something that you haven't even addressed yet.
3. IM's strongest hit managed to cut Thanos
4. Thor's feats prove that his lightning is more powerful and more destructive than IM's strongest hits
5. Thor has been shown capable of sustaining a continuous barrage of his lightning.
6. Thor's charged strikes against Hulk were more powerful than any single physical strike we've seen from Thanos. The proof is seen in their respective fights to Hulk
7. There's no proof that Thanos can tank multiple charged lightning blows from Thor without injury, especially since IM's strongest hits already wounded him.

You, on the other hand, have brought nothing to back up your arguments. Your argument that Thanos survived a single lightning blast from Thor without injury is not proof that he can withstand multiple lightning blasts. Using that logic, we can say that Thanos can't injure Spiderman through pure h2h since none of Thanos' punches were able to injure Spiderman. Is this the kind of shitty debate tactic you want to use?

I'm willing to bet instead of actually providing your own proof, all you're going to do is criticize what I've provided.

1. And? That isn't hurting.
2. 😂 No! That's a fallacy! The fact that someone is knocked down or moved doesn't mean it's hurt! Specially not someone like Thanos who's taken far worse than being rubbed against the ground!!!

Fallacy!
3. Lightning =/= punch! A punch, specially from a super strong being like IM, applies a bast amount of kinetic force in a small area! Furthermore, the Suit has edges and is made of metal! A punch like that would easily pierce through skin, just like a mitten does!
4. Lightning =/= punch! They affect differently on the material! And again, Thanos already took a lightning from Thor with 0 DAMAGE! You can cry all you want, the feat supports Thanos.
5. A continuous barrage of smaller, weaker lightning than the one Thanos got! Again, your prove nothing.
6. LOL!!!! Go watch IW fellow! And in case your forgot. Thanos is stronger, a better fighter, smarter and more durable than Thor!
7. You don't have an argument fellow!

Originally posted by FrothByte
Here's everything I have brought to the table so far:

You, on the other hand, have brought nothing to back up your arguments. Your argument that Thanos survived a single lightning blast from Thor without injury is not proof that he can withstand multiple lightning blasts. Using that logic, we can say that Thanos can't injure Spiderman through pure h2h since none of Thanos' punches were able to injure Spiderman. Is this the kind of shitty debate tactic you want to use?

I'm willing to bet instead of actually providing your own proof, all you're going to do is criticize what I've provided.

I have brought nothing!? 😂 You are clearly desperate!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zvp3ppiMa_s&t=76s

Minute 0:17 - 0:20

-Thor cowardly attacks Thanos unaware! He was likely afraid that if Thanos were to notice his presence, he would whoop his ass like he did in the beginning of the film.

-Furthermore, Thor uses a powerful lightning strong enough to push the unaware foe a couple of meters, destroying the ground underneath this.

- Once Thor stop's lightning, Thanos stands up WITHOUT an issue. He isn't bleeding. He isn't crying, "OMG, my skin burns due to the massive electron flow that has crossed my skin!". Thanos isn't fatigued or shows signs of weariness.

What i have brought:

a MOVIE FEAT that Thor's lightning was unable to hurt Thanos!

Conclusion:

Frothbyte is desperate bringing speculation to try bump the Movie Feat! 😂

^ You havent actually brought any evidence there that Thanos can tank Thors Lightning.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ You havent actually brought any evidence there that Thanos can tank Thors Lightning.

Perhaps you should check a doctor! It's either sickness or you being butthurt that makes you hallucinate.