Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Well, seems at least you are objective.In that aspect Thanos will just keep standing up.
And, does Thor have unlimited stamina? I don't think so, he will drain.
Neither does Thanos have unlimited stamina. And usually the person getting hit runs out of energy faster than the person doing the hitting.
Fact is, you don't even have proof that Thanos can survive multiple lightning blasts.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Neither does Thanos have unlimited stamina. And usually the person getting hit runs out of energy faster than the person doing the hitting.Fact is, you don't even have proof that Thanos can survive multiple lightning blasts.
He received a full lightning impact from Thor's SB without any signs of damage or fatigue from Thanos.
There is no evidence to suggest that Thor without SB will do any better!
Prove Thor can shoot multiple lightning simultaniously without draining.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
He received a full lightning impact from Thor's SB without any signs of damage or fatigue from Thanos.There is no evidence to suggest that Thor without SB will do any better!
Prove Thor can shoot multiple lightning simultaniously without draining.
Dude, I can take a full punch to the shoulder without any signs of damage or fatigue. That does not mean I can take multiple punches without any injury.
A single lightning blast from Thor already knocked Thanos off his feet. IM's strongest hit was able to make Thanos bleed. Thor's lightning blasts have far better destructive feats than anything IM has.
If you want to claim that Thanos can tank repeated lightning blasts from Thor then you'll need to prove that, since he wasn't even able to tank a single one. Otherwise you're claiming a no limits fallacy.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Dude, I can take a full punch to the shoulder without any signs of damage or fatigue. That does not mean I can take multiple punches without any injury.A single lightning blast from Thor already knocked Thanos off his feet. IM's strongest hit was able to make Thanos bleed. Thor's lightning blasts have far better destructive feats than anything IM has.
If you want to claim that Thanos can tank repeated lightning blasts from Thor then you'll need to prove that, since he wasn't even able to tank a single one. Otherwise you're claiming a no limits fallacy.
Prove Thor can shoot multiple lightning like the one he used on Thanos without draining. Otherwise everything you are saying is useless boy.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Prove Thor can shoot multiple lightning like the one he used on Thanos without draining. Otherwise everything you are saying is useless boy.
Nope, I asked first. First provide your proof then you can ask me to prove what you want. Otherwise you're just dodging my question.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Nope, I asked first. First provide your proof then you can ask me to prove what you want. Otherwise you're just dodging my question.
Nope, I did lol!
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Well, seems at least you are objective.In that aspect Thanos will just keep standing up.
And, does Thor have unlimited stamina? I don't think so, he will drain.
/\ here.
So, prove Thor can spam multiple lightning without draining.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Nope, I did lol!/\ here.
So, prove Thor can spam multiple lightning without draining.
Ragnarok bridge fight. Continuous lightning blasts from Thor. Avengers fight against the Chitauri, multiple times Thor used lightning blasts. Furthermore, not once have we seen Thor actually get tired from blasting out lightning.
Your turn. Before you ask anything else, please provide proof that Thanos can withstand multiple lightning blasts from Thor.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Ragnarok bridge fight. Continuous lightning blasts from Thor. Avengers fight against the Chitauri, multiple times Thor used lightning blasts. Furthermore, not once have we seen Thor actually get tired from blasting out lightning.Your turn. Before you ask anything else, please provide proof that Thanos can withstand multiple lightning blasts from Thor.
Lol. I knew you would say that, reason why I asked "similar to the one he used against Thanos".
The lightning he used on Asgard were small and nothing like the one Thanos got.
So, again, prove he can span enormous lightning without draining.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Lol. I knew you would say that, reason why I asked "similar to the one he used against Thanos".The lightning he used on Asgard were small and nothing like the one Thanos got.
So, again, prove he can span enormous lightning without draining.
This is a stupid never ending argument.
Prove he can keep shooting, prove he can keep taking it.
However we do KNOW Thanos can be harmed. And by characters far less powerful than Thor. We have yet to see Thor tire from shooting lightning.
Originally posted by The Sorrow
1)Thanos certainly felt the need to react and blast Iron Man, Spider-Man, Strange and the guardians, I guess based on your reasoning he was "fighting for his life" there too. What's funny is despite your claim, he didn't go to the same lengths to dispatch Thor as he did some of those guys. Thor isn't unique just because Thanos tried to blast him, even Spider-Man was able to annoy Thanos enough to warrant his attention.2)Why would he blast Hulk when Hulk was already grappling with him? If you're going to do mental gymnastics to somehow relate this to Thor then at least make sense.
3)Not really. Unfortunately for the hardcore Thor fans like yourself, he will never fight the way you wish he would, he isn't staying in the skies and using ranged attacks, Thor will always resort to melee, then melee-infused lightning attacks, maybe a thunderbolt if he's not making headway and that just plays into Thanos' hands IG or not.
1) You mean when their team effort had a legitimate chance of getting the gauntlet off him?
2) Urm no. He chose to grapple with Hulk instead of blasting him. If he did shoot Hulk right away, that would suggest Hulk rocked him fairly badly.
Again even Iron Man is able to injure Thanos. So its pretty silly to think Thors best Lightning blast will not do anything to him.
3) Funny because I do not remember him going toe to toe with The Destroyer. He started out his fights with both Malekith and IM from a distance despite them both being physically weaker than him.
Heck he attacked Thanos from the Sky in his final attack.
So you are the one creating a myth here that Thor WOULD NEVER fight like that. We have literally seen it.
Sure he likes to go H2H as well, but he isnt idiotic, and will strike from a distance when needed.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Lol. I knew you would say that, reason why I asked "similar to the one he used against Thanos".The lightning he used on Asgard were small and nothing like the one Thanos got.
So, again, prove he can span enormous lightning without draining.
Sorry dude, but I already provided multiple answers to support my claim whereas you haven't provided even a single one. If I answer this question all you'll do is keep asking for more. So how about you actually provide something to backup your claim that Thanos can tank multiple lightning blasts from Thor?
Once you've provided some proper proof to back up your arguments then you can go back to cross-questioning my arguments again.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
This is a stupid never ending argument.Prove he can keep shooting, prove he can keep taking it.
However we do KNOW Thanos can be harmed. And by characters far less powerful than Thor. We have yet to see Thor tire from shooting lightning.
Thanos withstood a lightning from Thor without damage. That's enough evidence to doom your biased opinion.
And you haven't proved that Thor can remain on the air indefinetly. Ergo, Thor lands and Thanos grabs him by the neck and bitches him like he did in the beginning of infinity war.
Get it over with Thor fanboy.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Sorry dude, but I already provided multiple answers to support my claim whereas you haven't provided even a single one. If I answer this question all you'll do is keep asking for more. So how about you actually provide something to backup your claim that Thanos can tank multiple lightning blasts from Thor?Once you've provided some proper proof to back up your arguments then you can go back to cross-questioning my arguments again.
Sorry dude, you proved nothing. You proved Thor can spam smaller attacks than the one Thanos got, ergo Thanos will be untouched.
Thanos beats Thor.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thanos withstood a lightning from Thor without damage. That's enough evidence to doom your biased opinion.And you haven't proved that Thor can remain on the air indefinetly. Ergo, Thor lands and Thanos grabs him by the neck and bitches him like he did in the beginning of infinity war.
Get it over with Thor fanboy.
What a dumb argument. You realize that just because you survive a first hit doesnt mean you can survive if you keep getting hit. The entire history of combat sports backs that up.
Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
What a dumb argument. You realize that just because you survive a first hit doesnt mean you can survive if you keep getting hit. The entire history of combat sports backs that up.
😂 If I throw a rock at a wall and it bounces, what prove is there that if I stone the same wall 100x it will crumble?
If you have evidence that Thor's lightning can harm Thanos then bring it on board, otherwise, I recommend you to watch Infinity War 😂
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
😂 If I throw a rock at a wall and it bounces, what prove is there that if I stone the same wall 100x it will crumble?If you have evidence that Thor's lightning can harm Thanos then bring it on board, otherwise, I recommend you to watch Infinity War 😂
That argument would hold weight if Thanos was shown to be invinceable which he is not. Iron Man was able to damage him. If you don't think Thor could then you are even more ignorant than I originally thought
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
😂 If I throw a rock at a wall and it bounces, what prove is there that if I stone the same wall 100x it will crumble?If you have evidence that Thor's lightning can harm Thanos then bring it on board, otherwise, I recommend you to watch Infinity War 😂
Your rock/wall analogy is flawed since the rock bounced off the wall and didn't make the wall fall down. Thor's lightning didn't just bounce off Thanos, it actually knocked him down. Any hit strong enough to knock you off your feet is not a hit that you can take repeatedly without injury.
You keep acting like Thanos completely tanked the lightning which wasn't the case.
So I'm still waiting for you to provide proof that Thanos can withstand multiple lightning hits from Thor.
Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
That argument would hold weight if Thanos was shown to be invinceable which he is not. Iron Man was able to damage him. If you don't think Thor could then you are even more ignorant than I originally thought
A punch =/= lightning. They aren't comparable feats. They are different attacks. It's like saying a lasser attack can be compared with a lightning attack. lol.
Thanos already took a full lightning from Thor WITHOUT damage. He was moved, yes, but he was fine.
Again, can you bring evidence that a certain amount of lightning attacks can harm Thanos, or just your speculation.
Perhaps you are more of a Thor fanboy than I thought you to be.