Comic Book Questions & Discussion

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
....

I literally said that they were written down in a team book.

How does that NOT mean low showing, lmao.

Seriously, stop posting until you actually read and understand my posts, and try previewing your posts and read them before you post.

Im talking about here...

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Called it.

Anyway, isn't this the same book where Thor/Cho/Herc/Vision were all unable to stop a measly meteor?

I'm with Sin here. Battles alone are not a good gauge.

You and Sin were saying they were written down. Glad you've changed stance. I'm done talking about this.

Originally posted by carver9
Im talking about here...

You and Sin were saying they were written down. Glad you've changed stance. I'm done talking about this.

Originally posted by carver9
No character in comics fight to the best of their abilities, Sin. You might as well call every battle plot based.

Carver, it's good for you to give up. You're just not on any of our levels in debating. Just stop while you can.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
But......you agreed....

Carver, it's good for you to give up. You're just not on any of our levels in debating. Just stop while you can.

Which means use every ability they have. This doesn't take away from their strength and durability. Stay on track. You mentioned the characters being weak, years back and you're changing stance. I'm just glad we've discovered you're a sometimer (for DC only). Kinda like what you did with cosmic Thor. Even though he tanked planetary attacks, you clung to the Boulder showing.

So what happens if Isca the Unbeaten fought, say, Molecule Man or Thanos with the IG?

Or what if she simply fought Saint of Killers? What could her "never lose" power do about an immortal, invulnerable angel of death who never misses?

What if she was in a society that had MAD? Everyone dies, everyone loses.

is comic discussion dead?

other than this forum where else could i even talk about it

Originally posted by carver9
Which means use every ability they have. This doesn't take away from their strength and durability. Stay on track. You mentioned the characters being weak, years back and you're changing stance. I'm just glad we've discovered you're a sometimer (for DC only). Kinda like what you did with cosmic Thor. Even though he tanked planetary attacks, you clung to the Boulder showing.

Originally posted by abhilegend
You mean where he used energy cannons from Apokolips?

Originally posted by carver9
Im talking about here...

You and Sin were saying they were written down. Glad you've changed stance. I'm done talking about this.

What are you two blathering about...

Carver's still salty after all these years lol. I've never seen anything like it....I hope it's not because you and I are on the same page

That Abhi thread he just bumped was good, I miss Jake.

Never read Chaos War, where Thor does the Glory hurting with winds from thousands of planets.

Is the event worth reading? And is it a tie in to Chaos King?

Edit: Oh, I see it's the same event. I guess Thor vs Glory happened in a tie in.

I usually skip tie ins, that would explain why I don't remember the feat.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Carver's still salty after all these years lol. I've never seen anything like it....I hope it's not because you and I are on the same page

👍 Nothing changes

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Carver's still salty after all these years lol. I've never seen anything like it....I hope it's not because you and I are on the same page

Not salty, just pointing out the obvious with you and Sin mentioning the characters were not impressive in that comic whereas you're trying to use fts outside of DOS to justify Doomsday power level. Wonder why 😄

So recent Defenders Beyond apparently makes something be beyond TOAA/ TOAA isn't the supreme being in Marvel anymore

Originally posted by carver9
Not salty, just pointing out the obvious with you and Sin mentioning the characters were not impressive in that comic whereas you're trying to use fts outside of DOS to justify Doomsday power level. Wonder why 😄

Stay salty, and maybe think about whether a debate site is your thing. Maybe try debating on Facebook or YouTube? Might be more your speed.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
So recent Defenders Beyond apparently makes something be beyond TOAA/ TOAA isn't the supreme being in Marvel anymore

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
So recent Defenders Beyond apparently makes something be beyond TOAA/ TOAA isn't the supreme being in Marvel anymore

Nice to see that Marvel follows DCs retarded way of going bigger and bigger for the sheer sake of doing it.

Marvel was always the first to go bigger and bigger since Beyonder appeared.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Nice to see that Marvel follows DCs retarded way of going bigger and bigger for the sheer sake of doing it.

That's why for me, the Byrne era was the most interesting.

But at least after decades of hearing about Gladiator punching out a planet, Drax ripping apart a sun, and Thor and Beta Ray Bill shaking the universe striking their hammers together, Abhi can finally win comic book battles against other nerds.

Originally posted by carver9
Not salty, just pointing out the obvious with you and Sin mentioning the characters were not impressive in that comic whereas you're trying to use fts outside of DOS to justify Doomsday power level. Wonder why 😄

I still have no idea what you're talking about