I take it that the people who voted for Thor are bias towards marvel. Meaning, they know WW wins yet still vote for Thor.
Anyone who can CONSISTENTLY see bullets in slow motion will see Thor far slower. This fight is actually spite due to the speed deficit.
If speed were equalized then I give it to Thor.
Originally posted by h1a8
Wrong! I posted afterwards that I rewatched the scene and saw that WW caught the sword more on the sides and thus making her cut proof invalid. Initially I believed HulkisHulk when he stated she caught the sword by the edge. But speed still has nothing to do with it. It's technique. You can have speed and catch the sword the wrong way and get cut.
Let's be honest, You believed HH's version because you've never seen the scene and his interpretation helped a DC character. that you claim to have change your mind later doesn't change the fact that I was right. this did start with you arguing that it was impossible for WW to have caught it without bleeding.
Let's be honest, we all know the real reason you were trying to prove the sword catch was impossible to do without being cut.
Originally posted by h1a8
Of course an idiot like you would not understand simple logic and think it's comedy. Actually attack the argument and not the person (ad hominim). Otherwise you are just proving to be a low intelligent creature (slightly above the other animals).
No, I’ll just attack you since you’re the idiot that can’t put together logical arguments, yet think they can. Everyone is laughing at you. No one takes you seriously. Kill yourself already and do KMC a favor.
Originally posted by h1a8
Because you know the initial argument was about WW being bulletproof. Silent thought it was about speed and is looking like an idiot. Yet you won't correct him as to what the original argument was about. Playing dumb maybe to protect your ally?
No, he has a quote of you talking specifically about speed.
Originally posted by FrothByte
No, he has a quote of you talking specifically about speed.
See, he is just proving that I'm right about him being dishonest. Plus we all know why he is trying to prove the sword catch was impossible. it's so he can use it later to prove she's bullet-proof.
We also know why he is harping on what I said, he's trying to distract from the fact that he lost the debate.
Originally posted by FrothByte
No, he has a quote of you talking specifically about speed.
He quoted my reply to you showing why Martial art schools are culty.
When the teacher demonstrates something they always have the volunteer freeze after the swing, allowing the illusion of frozen time. Yet in a real life fight, that shit goes out the window.
He butted in our discussion, which was about WW being bulletproof (through being cut proof).
We both agreed that WW caught the sword more on the side long before Silent made his comment about speed and reflexes. Therefore his post has nothing to do with what we are talking about.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
But it doesn't even make sense., why would you need to keep repeating something you know is not accurate?
Originally posted by h1a8
If speed were equalized.
The problem here is WW sees bullets in slow-mo. Thor, who is significantly slower than a bullet, would appear vastly slower.
We have gone through this before.
A baseball player can hit 100 mile per hour fastballs just fine and they do not see the ball in slow motion.
Wonder woman does not see bullets in slow motion. Is there a scene that shows this that I am forgetting. If there is, post it.
Originally posted by Inhuman
We have gone through this before.
A baseball player can hit 100 mile per hour fastballs just fine and they do not see the ball in slow motion.
Wonder woman does not see bullets in slow motion. Is there a scene that shows this that I am forgetting. If there is, post it.
You lowball with the best of them but get no flack for it because you do it against the DC side.
Baseballs and bullets are two different things. No human can hit a bullet.
It takes 0.4 seconds for a 100mph to travel from the picture to the hitter. Human reactions can be as low as 0.2 seconds. A jab can be snapped out in less time than the time it takes for a 100mph fastball to travel to the hitter.
A bullet is a different story.
There were a few scenes in WW that showed her seeing bullets in slow motion. How else would she be able to perceive a bullet from point blank range easily?
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So how do humans hit 100mph baseballs as said above?
It's not about speed in itself but TIME.
Time = distance/speed
A 100mph fastball takes 0.4 of a second to reach the hitter. Human reactions can be as low as 0.2 of a second.
Guess how much time is elapsed when a bullet travels 5ft?