WW vs. Thor: pure h2h cage match

Started by Silent Master9 pages
Originally posted by h1a8
I'm very smart. It seems that you are the dumb one.

No, you're really not or else given the context of your current argument with FrothByte, you would understand why I brought up WW being fast enough to catch the blade properly.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you're really not or else given the context of your current argument with FrothByte, you would understand why I brought up WW being fast enough to catch the blade properly.

You are an idiot.
The initial argument stemmed whether WW is bulletproof. You even have members posting shit with bullets bouncing off WW's boobs. HulkIsHulk initially suggested that WW is bulletproof because of the sword catch.
Frost, me, and Hulk been discussing the issue since then. Go back and reread.

Froth get in here and correct your boy.

Originally posted by h1a8
You are an idiot.
The initial argument stemmed whether WW is bulletproof. You even have members posting shit with bullets bouncing off WW's boobs. HulkIsHulk initially suggested that WW is bulletproof because of the sword catch.
Frost, me, and Hulk been discussing the issue since then. Go back and reread.

Froth get in here and correct your boy.

OMG, you really are retarded. maybe you should go back and read your own posts a few dozen times and then ask your caretaker very nicely and they might explain why my post was appropriate.

You are the retarded one here. Froth won't comment because you and him are on the same side. He should clearly tell you what the initial debate was about since you are too dumb to find out.

Originally posted by h1a8
You are the retarded one here. Froth won't comment because you and him are on the same side. He should clearly tell you what the initial debate was about since you are too dumb to find out.

I'm not commenting because I have no idea what you two are arguing about. I brought in the sword-grabbing techniques as proof that what WW did to the sword is not proof that she was bullet proof. However, Silent's response to you seems to be about your claim of time not slowing down for martial artists. It's that post about Bruce Lee which I can't seem to see. I assume he's talking about that, and I know nothing about that discussion other than to say that black belts don't guarantee real life experience.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I'm not commenting because I have no idea what you two are arguing about. I brought in the sword-grabbing techniques as proof that what WW did to the sword is not proof that she was bullet proof. However, Silent's response to you seems to be about your claim of time not slowing down for martial artists. It's that post about Bruce Lee which I can't seem to see. I assume he's talking about that, and I know nothing about that discussion other than to say that black belts don't guarantee real life experience.

Part of his attempt to refute your point was him mentioning how real fights happen fast which means that people don't have to think about what to do. thus me mentioning WW's speed. but he is too retarded to see the connection.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Part of his attempt to refute your point was him mentioning how real fights happen fast which means that people don't have to think about what to do. thus me mentioning WW's speed. but he is too retarded to see the connection.

I think he deleted that post, as the only place I see it is in your quote. Wonder why he deleted it...

Just proves that he's both a coward and a troll.

Or realized how awful it was.

Originally posted by riv6672
Or realized how awful it was.

Right, but now he's acting like he doesn't know why I brought up WW's speed as according to him it has nothing to do with their argument.

So basically, he knows my comment was related, but he's being purposely dishonest to try and save face.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I'm not commenting because I have no idea what you two are arguing about. I brought in the sword-grabbing techniques as proof that what WW did to the sword is not proof that she was bullet proof. However, Silent's response to you seems to be about your claim of time not slowing down for martial artists. It's that post about Bruce Lee which I can't seem to see. I assume he's talking about that, and I know nothing about that discussion other than to say that black belts don't guarantee real life experience.

Wrong. HulkisHulk suggested WW is bulletproof because of her grabbing the sword and not being cut. We even have pictures of WW blocking bullets with her boobs. Then you replied by saying she did so by clasping the sides.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Part of his attempt to refute your point was him mentioning how real fights happen fast which means that people don't have to think about what to do. thus me mentioning WW's speed. but he is too retarded to see the connection.

You are an idiot. That had nothing to do with the bulletproof argument. Froth gave Hema martial arts demonstration as evidence to support humans grabbing swords without being cut. I replied by saying most martial arts are culty in response. Either you didn’t read the entire exchange or you are extremely dumb.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I think he deleted that post, as the only place I see it is in your quote. Wonder why he deleted it...

I didnt delete anything. Everything is there.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Right, but now he's acting like he doesn't know why I brought up WW's speed as according to him it has nothing to do with their argument.

So basically, he knows my comment was related, but he's being purposely dishonest to try and save face.

It seems you are trying to save face. You didnt know that the whole argument was about WW being bulletproof.

Why would speed having anything to do with WW being bulletproof or not?

Speed is irrelevant. The argument is WW being cutproof means she is bulletproof (HulkisHulk argument). I stated WW isn't cut proof as she grabbed the sides more and therefore she isn't bulletproof either.

Originally posted by h1a8
Wrong. HulkisHulk suggested WW is bulletproof because of her grabbing the sword and not being cut. We even have pictures of WW blocking bullets with her boobs. Then you replied by saying she did so by clasping the sides.

How am I wrong when what you said was exactly what I said?

It appears that h1 can't even keep his argument straight as this whole thing started with him arguing that it's impossible for people to catch a blade like WW did without bleeding. which would mean that WW doing so is proof that she is at least cut resistant if not immune.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Right, but now he's acting like he doesn't know why I brought up WW's speed as according to him it has nothing to do with their argument.

So basically, he knows my comment was related, but he's being purposely dishonest to try and save face.


Well that part’s just him being Trump-ish....😛

Originally posted by FrothByte
How am I wrong when what you said was exactly what I said?
Because you know the initial argument was about WW being bulletproof. Silent thought it was about speed and is looking like an idiot. Yet you won't correct him as to what the original argument was about. Playing dumb maybe to protect your ally?

I didnt know ppl actually used words like ‘ally’ in RL.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It appears that h1 can't even keep his argument straight as this whole thing started with him arguing that it's impossible for people to catch a blade like WW did without bleeding. which would mean that WW doing so is proof that she is at least cut resistant if not immune.

Wrong! I posted afterwards that I rewatched the scene and saw that WW caught the sword more on the sides and thus making her cut proof invalid. Initially I believed HulkisHulk when he stated she caught the sword by the edge. But speed still has nothing to do with it. It's technique. You can have speed and catch the sword the wrong way and get cut.

Originally posted by h1a8
I just rewatched the scene. It appears that WW could have applied significantly more pressure to the sides and not much to the blade. So you are correct.

But here's a far stronger argument that WW could be cut by the sword and is not bulletproof:

The writer had her catch the sword to prevent being stabbed.
The writer had her block bullets to prevent her from being injured by them. In other words, writer's intentions are that she is not bulletproof.

Now after her Ares upgrade it is somewhat debatable. Tbh, I'm not sure either way. All I know is she became significantly more powerful.