Captain Marvel vs Superman

Started by Josh_Alexander34 pages

Originally posted by Eon Blue
H1 disagreeing with math. The subject he claims greatness in.

Proof that Josh, aka, H1 is a troll. He’s trolling himself.

Hey Quan, I know you bought this account on the sole purpose of trolling, just take it easy okay.

Stop derailing threads unless you want to suffer your beloved Fly's fate.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
It doesn't mean you have super-reflexes, however it does mean you need super-reflexes should you want to avoid crashing.

Again, Captain Marvel seemed comfortable at flying through unknown space at the speed of light, ergo, she had super-reflexes (unless she is retarded)


.

Your conclusion does not flow from the premise due to other possible explanations.

They need long range sensors to determine where suitable planets are. Otherwise they would be flying through space blindly.
These sensors can help them detect objects that are in their path.

Another explanation is she also can be comfortable because she knows the probability of hitting something is basically 0, even when flying blindly through space. In other words, to disprove that explanation, you have to prove that flying randomly in space, at light speed, for a year, have a probability higher than 0.000001 of hitting something.

Another explanation is she didn't think about it, as what it appears in the film. The writer does not think about these things. You are basically going against writer's intentions.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
According to Marvel science it is. We must assume that's the case.

LOL! Now we aren't going by science, but "marvel science".

Point to the marvel science showing she can fight at FTL speeds. Is there a deleted scene where Tony rants about FTL reflex marvel science?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
According to Marvel science it is. We must assume that's the case.

So you ditched using science and have resorted to "Marvell Science."

😂

You just conceded to me as I said you cant use science to explain these feats.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So you ditched using science and have resorted to "Marvell Science."

😂

You just conceded to me as I said you cant use science to explain these feats.

What he's truly saying is marvel science operates differently from our own...except when it doesn't. This is actually correct lol. It is the *same* reason why a character is not usually granted FTL combat speed based on nothing but flying fast in space.

Originally posted by Surtur
LOL! Now we aren't going by science, but "marvel science".

Point to the marvel science showing she can fight at FTL speeds. Is there a deleted scene where Tony rants about FTL reflex marvel science?

Originally posted by Surtur
What he's truly saying is marvel science operates differently from our own...except when it doesn't. This is actually correct lol. It is the *same* reason why a character is not usually granted FTL combat speed based on nothing but flying fast in space.

Trying to use absolutes to debate is PATHETIC

You are basically saying that either I use science on EVERYTHING or on NOTHING.

That's clearly not the case boy! You'll use science where science can be use, otherwise you don't.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So you ditched using science and have resorted to "Marvell Science."

😂

You just conceded to me as I said you cant use science to explain these feats.

Hi boy.

Originally posted by h1a8
.

Your conclusion does not flow from the premise due to other possible explanations.

They need long range sensors to determine where suitable planets are. Otherwise they would be flying through space blindly.
These sensors can help them detect objects that are in their path.

Another explanation is she also can be comfortable because she

knows the probability of hitting something is basically 0, even when flying blindly through space. In other words, to disprove that explanation, you have to prove that flying randomly in space, at light speed, for a year, have a probability higher than 0.000001 of hitting something.

Another explanation is she didn't think about it, as what it appears in the film. The writer does not think about these things. You are basically going against writer's intentions.

Stop bringing probability numbers into the debate. You have no evidence to back up such numbers, ergo they are invalid.

All we know is that the probability of crashing is UNKNOWN. Could be high or could be low.

All I am saying is that travelling through space without proper reflexes at SL is stupid.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Stop bringing probability numbers into the debate. You have no evidence to back up such numbers, ergo they are invalid.

All we know is that the probability of crashing is UNKNOWN. Could be high or could be low.

All I am saying is that travelling through space without proper reflexes at SL is stupid.

It could be stupid to fly through space with less than human level reactions or its not stupid. Although non stupid characters do stupid things all the time, It depends on many factors (as such things as I named). Therefore, her flying through space at light speed isn't proof to her reflexes being greater than human level.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Hi boy.

Concession accepted.

Originally posted by h1a8
It could be stupid to fly through space with less than human level reactions or its not stupid. Although non stupid characters do stupid things all the time, It depends on many factors (as such things as I named). Therefore, her flying through space at light speed isn't proof to her reflexes being greater than human level.

Yeah, well, I don't think Carol is stupid.

Superman breaks her neck

so what we have in the film is carol withstanding a black hole
carol easily dispatching ships that survived a black hole.
superman almost failing in durability to the world engine.

it's pretty obvious that carol can power through superman who cannot withstand a black hole. she has on screen feats that show she may be too durable for him to hurt her much.

not saying I like this. but we are going off the movies. it's all there. there can be no unbiased, logical dispute.

He already withstood a black hole. And her black hole feat isn’t a valid forum feat.

Originally posted by Raisen
so what we have in the film is carol withstanding a black hole
carol easily dispatching ships that survived a black hole.
superman almost failing in durability to the world engine.

it's pretty obvious that carol can power through superman who cannot withstand a black hole. she has on screen feats that show she may be too durable for him to hurt her much.

not saying I like this. but we are going off the movies. it's all there. there can be no unbiased, logical dispute.

👆

Honestly Carol isn't my favorite superhero, but ohh well...Gonna have to wait for Sentry...

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
He already withstood a black hole. And her black hole feat isn’t a valid forum feat.

World Engine =/= Black hole.

But don't worry, not expecting much from you, boy! 😂

Sorry your “Marvel Science” doesn’t fly here.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Sorry your “Marvel Science” doesn’t fly here.

No where in MoS was it stated that the World Engine was a black hole, sorry ;'(

Superman loses, just don't let that affect you, child.

world engine didn't even come close to seeming like a black hole.

can we get somebody to weigh in on this? it seems pretty obvious the outcome of this

why is the black hole not a valid forum feat?