Shazam vs. Captain Marvel

Originally posted by Silent Master
Nobody is going to take your word for it, provide proof.

Premise2: The scenes where Shazam uses his speed to get from point A to B.

Since you have provided no proof, your argument is thrown out. Thus Carol wins by default.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Since you have provided no proof, your argument is thrown out. Thus Carol wins by default.

Only in your mind.

Ok, name one person besides yourself that thinks you've provided proof in this thread.

I don't need to in order for my argument be valid.
If you disagree with any of the premises then you should explain why. Otherwise you are trolling.

As you provided no proof, you have no argument.

Thus Carol wins by default.

Originally posted by Silent Master
As you provided no proof, you have no argument.

Thus Carol wins by default.

In your mind.

Ok, name one person besides yourself that thinks you've provided proof in this thread.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't need to in order for my argument be valid.
If you disagree with any of the premises then you should explain why. Otherwise you are trolling.

No proof = argument thrown out.

In your mind

Fine, I'll get a mod ruling.

You can do whatever you like. Just make sure you don't twist things.

Screen feats are validation.

Mere speculation doesn’t hold water.

Either provide concrete, detailed proof of your claims or concede.

I agree.
That's why my argument holds.

No, that is why your argument doesn't hold. because you haven't provided any proof. you just want us to take your word for what you claim the movies show.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, that is why your argument doesn't hold. because you haven't provided any proof. you just want us to take your word for what you claim the movies show.

No, it's exactly why it holds. She has no on screen feats of her reacting to things that happen as fast as Shazam has blitzed instantly.
To be specific, she never showed beyond human reaction times.
Shazam has multiple times ON SCREEN traveled from point A to B faster than a human can react to.

If the screen feats show Shazam moving very much faster than normal human reaction, then what's the argument?

Originally posted by Impediment
If the screen feats show Shazam moving very much faster than normal human reaction, then what's the argument?

Among other things, he hasn't provided any proof for any of his multiple claims, he wants us to just take his word for what the movies show in regards to Billy and Carol's speed.

IOW, he wants us to use his interpretation of the movie, rather than the movie itself.

Shazam is consistently shown moving at super speed. He crossed a city in seconds to stop that bus.